Topic: Monsanto

Greg Carlwood and David Wetschler discuss how the modern agricultural system is built on "consumables" like pesticides and chemical fertilizers to ensure recurring profits. They compare the rebranding of chemical weapons into products like Roundup to the suppression of abundant energy alternatives. Wetschler notes that despite this history, online communities are now rapidly sharing electroculture knowledge to reverse the trend.

A Wells Fargo patent for authenticating users via Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS), or "smart dust," is examined. The technology reportedly captures biometric, audio, and motion data for authentication. The discussion expands into the broader implications of nanotechnology, including "flying vaccinators" (mosquitoes) and the potential for corporations to patent the human genome, drawing parallels to Monsanto's agricultural patents.

The dialogue explores the difficulty of opting out of a global system that funds unethical practices through taxes and 401k investments. The host and guest discuss how standard index funds often prop up companies like Monsanto and Meta, effectively making citizens complicit in environmental devastation and slave labor. They conclude that modern globalization has replaced traditional slavery with a more opaque, systemic version that is nearly impossible to avoid.

The discussion cites Henry Kissinger’s strategy of controlling people through food and identifies the modern lawn as a physical foundation of enslavement. Lawns are criticized as monochromatic, poisonous environments often treated with glyphosate, a chemical linked to significant legal settlements against Monsanto. The speakers argue that replacing these toxic spaces with food-producing systems is a simple solution to systemic control.

The episode concludes with the standard Higher Side Chats musical outro. The lyrics reference various conspiracy themes, including Monsanto, the elite, and alternative researchers like John Anthony West and Crow777. The song reinforces the show's identity as a destination for those seeking "truth" outside of mainstream media narratives.

The guest argues that the push for plant-based diets is a strategy for corporate control of the food supply. While a chicken egg cannot be patented, proprietary processes for "plant-based eggs" allow corporations to own the means of production. This is framed as an extension of the GMO and glyphosate era, aimed at making the global population dependent on massive corporate producers.

A former Monsanto scientist claims the company rewrote safety studies to hide health issues found in rats fed genetically engineered corn. In a related real-world case, a South African farmer saw a total reversal of disease in both his livestock and his workers after switching from GMO corn to non-GMO varieties.

The discussion shifts to modern mind control techniques involving the genetic modification of food and humans. Miller claims Monsanto is attempting to alter wheat genes to allow for brain reprogramming, while pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer use similar concepts for population control. He further alleges that graphene oxide included in certain injections acts as an antenna, broadcasting biological data from the human body to the cloud.

Greg Carlwood revisits claims from Esoteric Agenda regarding Codex Alimentarius, a UN-backed initiative alleged to restrict nutrient access and mandate chemical treatments for livestock. While the 2009 implementation did not result in the predicted three billion immediate deaths, the hosts note a significant decline in global health and increased coordination between food and medicine think tanks. They also address the failed 2012 consciousness jump prophecies, questioning if the timeline was simply delayed or suppressed.

The guest analyzes the funding of the Boy Scouts of America, noting that major donors include defense contractors like Lockheed Martin and banks like JP Morgan. He argues that the organization is led by individuals with deep ties to the CIA and the Council on Foreign Relations, such as Robert Gates. The guest characterizes the program as a way to prepare children to transfer their wealth to these corporate entities throughout their lives.

Shortages in farm equipment and repair parts are identified as a specific threat to independent farmers, while large corporations like Monsanto and Tyson remain insulated. The host warns that the country could face a repeat of the 2019 retail shortages, but with more severe logistical complications. Listeners are advised to maintain a level of preparedness and stock up on essential supplies as a safeguard against further economic instability.

Host Greg Carlwood introduces investigative journalist Carrie Gillum to discuss her extensive reporting on corporate agriculture and pesticides. Gillum, the Research Director for U.S. Right to Know, authored "Whitewash" and "The Monsanto Papers," documenting the history of Roundup and the corruption of science. The introduction highlights her 20-year focus on food safety and her transition from covering banking at Reuters to investigating genetically engineered crops in Kansas.

Carrie Gillum describes the aggressive tactics used by Monsanto to control media narratives, including wooing influential journalists before turning to harassment if they stray from company talking points. Litigation discovery revealed Monsanto utilized search engine optimization manipulation to discredit Gillum and funded front groups like the American Council on Science and Health. These organizations present themselves as independent scientific bodies while surreptitiously attacking researchers and reporters who highlight chemical risks.

Bayer purchased Monsanto for $63 billion in 2018, just as massive litigation regarding glyphosate-based herbicides and non-Hodgkin lymphoma began. Glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, is the most widely used herbicide globally and has been detected in human blood, urine, and rainfall. Despite its pervasiveness in food and water supplies, the chemical remains a staple for farmers, homeowners, and utility companies for vegetation management.

Monsanto earned the derogatory nickname "Mon-Satan" among activists and even some farmers due to its aggressive legal tactics regarding patented seeds. The company famously sued farmers suspected of saving seeds or using them without paying licensing fees, creating a culture of fear in agricultural communities. In Creve Coeur, Missouri, local ordinances were even passed to prevent protesters from gathering outside the corporate headquarters.

The monologue continues with a call for local action, such as growing food to counter corporations like Bayer Monsanto. Carlwood also discusses the "intellectual blind spots" of highly educated professionals who fail to account for conspiracy or corruption in their models of the world, specifically mentioning structural engineers and 9/11.

Dr. Farrell criticizes Donald Trump for allowing Dr. Anthony Fauci to dominate the COVID-19 narrative and for promoting Operation Warp Speed. He expresses deep skepticism regarding mRNA vaccines, fearing they will tinker with human DNA and turn individuals into corporate property. The discussion touches on the history of companies like IG Farben and the potential for corporations to hold "liens" against modified human genetics.

The conversation shifts to the risks of moving abroad, with Tavares describing how expats in Central and South America are often targeted by local police "gangs." She notes that even third-world countries are heavily chemtrailed and dominated by Monsanto's GMO crops. She recommends building "hoop houses" and growing sprouts as a way to maintain a clean food supply when commercial options are poisoned.

Crowe compares viral theories to the sugar industry's historical effort to blame fat for heart disease to divert attention from sugar. He suggests that companies like Monsanto benefit when environmental poisoning (like St. Louis Encephalitis) is blamed on a virus. He argues that virologists are trained to see every disease as a "nail" for their viral "hammer," ignoring toxins in the air or water.

Steven Druker highlights the FDA's explicit agenda to promote the biotechnology industry, a policy originating in the Reagan administration. He describes the agency's "voluntary consultation" process as a sham that allows companies like Monsanto and DuPont to claim regulation without undergoing actual scientific review. The FDA does not require original test data or issue formal safety approvals for new GE crops.