Topic: Boston Bombing

Greg Carlwood reflects on the interview, noting the "psy-op circus" of current events and the potential for censorship on platforms like YouTube and Spotify. He discusses the theory that major sporting events are rigged to coincide with national tragedies or agendas, citing the Rams' victory in Ukrainian colors and historical examples from author Brian Tuey. Carlwood emphasizes the importance of the THC RSS feed to bypass corporate platform interference.

John Le Bon explains his "Hoax Hierarchy," a triangular schematic used to categorize various events based on their impact on the human mind and lifestyle. The hierarchy ranges from "baby hoaxes" like the Boston bombing and Sandy Hook to more significant deceptions. The goal is to conceptualize how these events shape public perception rather than just proving individual cases.

A speaker recounts watching the San Bernardino shooting coverage in real-time, noting that initial reports described four men in black military fatigues. This observation is compared to the Boston Bombing suspects. The discussion highlights how the narrative shifted within hours to a Middle Eastern couple affiliated with ISIS, suggesting the first reports are often the most accurate.

Michael Joseph describes his transition from a skeptical musician to an esoteric researcher, triggered by a surprisingly accurate astrological reading and the 2012 Boston Bombing. He details his exposure to the Hegelian dialectic through Mark Passio and his subsequent exploration of both Orthodox Christian and New Age perspectives on the New World Order. This journey led him to investigate the discrepancies between elite literature and common conspiracy theories regarding Saturn and the Demiurge.

The host reflects on the interview, urging listeners to subscribe to Michael Joseph's YouTube channel, Schism206. He notes that Joseph's nuanced approach helps bridge the gap between NASA's public deception and the underlying occult beliefs of secret societies. The conversation is highlighted as a more sophisticated alternative to typical "Satanic panic" narratives, providing a clearer framework for understanding elite motivations.

The discussion contrasts the organic growth of the Pizzagate investigation on 4chan with mainstream media events like the Orlando Pulse shooting or the Boston bombing. Marty Leeds argues that the lack of immediate media coverage suggests the movement was not a government-led psychological operation, as typical psyops receive massive, coordinated media amplification.

The discussion turns to the claim that no one died during the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting or the Boston Marathon bombing. Ole Dammegard mentions his work on the book "Nobody Died at Sandy Hook," which was banned from Amazon. He points to FBI homicide statistics for Newtown in 2012 as evidence that the official story is a fabrication.

A debate ensues regarding whether tragic events are completely simulated or involve real casualties alongside staged elements. The guest maintains a hardline stance that these events are entirely fake, citing Sandy Hook as a primary example of a "total put-on." The host expresses more uncertainty, wondering if real violence is sometimes used to anchor the staged media coverage.

Jim Fetzer argues that the Boston Marathon bombing trial was a sham and that the Tsarnaev brothers were falsely accused. He cites claims from their aunt, Maret Saranova, regarding Tamerlan's beard and surveillance footage inconsistencies. Further claims involve the color of the backpacks used in the bombing and the circumstances of Tamerlan's death in police custody.

Host Greg Carlwood reflects on the interview, mentioning that the "plus show" portion covered more controversial topics like Sandy Hook and the Boston bombings. He shares a personal anecdote about trying the "Lucid Light" device mentioned by Anthony Peake and encourages listeners to be more present and helpful during the holiday season. Carlwood emphasizes the importance of "elevating those below us" rather than isolating ourselves from the poor or immigrants.

Drawing on his experience as a physical special effects expert in the film industry, Jay Weidner analyzes the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing. He asserts that the smoke and color of the explosions were characteristic of harmless movie pyrotechnics designed for visual impact rather than actual destruction. Weidner suggests the event served dual political purposes: advancing gun control agendas and testing the government's ability to lock down a major American city.

Dammegard claims that a large pentagram made of train sleepers was discovered at the protest site the next morning, which he interpreted as a ritualistic marker. He also noted that people inside the hotel wore ID tags identical to those seen at Sandy Hook and the Boston Bombing. He believes his efforts to pull the pentagram apart and spread information successfully halted the operation.

The host introduces the 90th episode by comparing modern discourse to Franklin Delano Roosevelt's Fireside Chats. A case is made for questioning official government and media narratives, specifically regarding the potential use of crisis actors and staged elements during the Boston Marathon bombing. The discussion emphasizes that skepticism of authority is a necessary response to a history of institutional lies.

Victor Thorne argues that the Boston Marathon bombing was a staged hoax intended to provide the "blood and guts" missing from the Sandy Hook event. He compares the media coverage and the prime-time manhunt for the Tsarnaev brothers to the film Wag the Dog, suggesting the event was a manufactured strategy of tension.

The conversation explores the pattern of emergency drills occurring simultaneously with major tragedies, including the September 11 attacks and the Boston Marathon bombing. Smallstorm notes that FEMA was present at Pier 34 in New York for a bioterror drill on the day of 9/11. She posits that the proximity of these teams is a cover story for the larger drill being reported as a live event.

John Rapoport addresses theories regarding Sandy Hook and the Boston Marathon bombing, stating that while he believes people actually died, the events contained significant staged elements for political purposes. He argues these tragedies are used for social engineering to pacify the population and attack the Second Amendment. The goal is to create a fearful public that willingly cedes authority to law enforcement in exchange for a false sense of safety.

The narrative that Mexico is dangerous is challenged by comparing it to the violence in Chicago and the lockdown of Boston following the marathon bombing. The Boston event is described as a potential false flag that allowed the government to shut down a major city. Mexico is presented as a freer environment where personal liberties are respected and police interference is minimal.

Sophia Smallstorm will present her research on the Sandy Hook shooting, which she characterizes as a false flag event similar to the Aurora theater shooting and the Boston bombing. The discussion mentions the presence of "crisis actors" and the occurrence of government drills on the same day as these tragedies as evidence of an "Inception-style" illusion.

The discussion shifts to the government's use of domestic drones and the lack of public resistance during high-profile manhunts like those for Christopher Dorner and the Boston Bombing suspects. Concerns are raised that these individuals may be used as scapegoats or patsies in a system that increasingly bypasses traditional trials.

David Seaman expresses skepticism regarding the technical ability of the 19-year-old Boston Bombing suspect to build complex explosives. He criticizes the US government's tendency to use such tragedies to pass restrictive laws like the Patriot Act, contrasting it with how Norway handles national trauma.