Topic: Voting

There is a strategic opportunity to support the unpicking of bloated federal agencies, starting with the potential abolition of ICE. While often used as a partisan wedge issue, the dismantling of any agency with the power to deport or use force is seen as a win against tyranny. Individuals are encouraged to view reality in "God mode," recognizing their own power to influence these macro shifts.

Abolitionist Lysander Spooner’s 1870 work, No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority, argues that the U.S. Constitution lacks legal validity. Historical records suggest the 1787 Philadelphia Convention was hijacked to replace the Articles of Confederation without authorization. At the time of the first elections, less than 1% of the population actually voted, yet newspapers and bankers portrayed the new government as a legitimate mandate.

Bassett draws a parallel between the disclosure movement and the 85-year struggle of the Civil Rights Movement, noting that both require persistent pressure against a resistant state. He argues that every president since Harry Truman has likely known the basic truth of the ET presence, starting with the 1947 Roswell crash. Bassett highlights the unique challenge of this movement: unlike other social causes, the government denies that the subject of the activism even exists.

A review of Election Day events includes reports of gas leaks, Russian bomb threats, and technical glitches in various precincts. The discussion references the testimony of Clint Curtis regarding voting machine manipulation and the historical precedent of gerrymandering. Skepticism is expressed regarding the sudden "landslide" victory and the lack of systemic changes to voting security since previous contested elections.

Ed Calderon advocates for direct civic engagement and community involvement rather than passive social media activism. He notes a rise in anti-American sentiment in places like Mexico City due to the gentrification caused by American expats and economic migrants. This cultural shift has led to friction as Americans move to Mexico to escape domestic economic realities while attempting to maintain their previous lifestyles.

Jeff Harmon claims that infectious disease specialists have privately confirmed to him that COVID-19 was a genetically engineered pathogen, possibly linked to snake venom. He urges listeners to participate in the political process to remove "insane communists" from office, but emphasizes that the ultimate battle is one of conscious awareness. The United States is described as the "cog in the wheel" for global freedom.

Northrup advocates for becoming a "one issue voter" focused on medical freedom and the right to refuse state-mandated injections. She shares an anecdote from Maine regarding a local legislator who voted against a bill that would have allowed designated caregivers to visit loved ones in nursing homes during a pandemic. She characterizes such restrictions as crimes against humanity.

Trump's legal team builds cases involving voting software with ties to Venezuela, Canada, Spain, and Germany. Dr. Farrell expresses concern over machines being connected to the internet and the potential for foreign interference in the tallying process. He dismisses the theory that Trump allowed the fraud to happen as a "sting operation," arguing that such a move would unnecessarily cause a constitutional crisis.

Microsoft's Election Guard software, developed with ties to DARPA and Unit 8200, is being promoted as a solution for voting security. Chris Krebs of CISA has lobbied for its adoption despite potential security risks. The discussion suggests that chaos in the 2020 election, involving mail-in voting and fraud allegations, may be used to justify the widespread implementation of this software in future cycles.

Greg Carlwood reflects on the interview, discussing the "play politics or get played" dilemma. He compares American political apathy to European countries where citizens actively demand better labor conditions, such as more vacation days and maternity leave. Carlwood argues that while voting may feel like a waste of time, the elite will only grant the minimum concessions that the public is willing to accept through pressure.

The guests examine modern methods of power suppression, including gerrymandering and the gentrification of neighborhoods like Harlem. They specifically focus on felony disenfranchisement, noting its rise in importance following the Voting Rights Act. By "felonizing" low-level drug possession, the system effectively locks large portions of the Black community out of the political process, preventing them from electing local officials like sheriffs or school board chairs.

The conversation posits that the military-industrial complex is a primary beneficiary of blackmailed politicians who vote against their constituency's interests when "markers" are called in. Bryant also discusses the use of organized crime figures and thugs to protect blackmail artists from retaliation.

The concept of "work democracy" involves employees having the authority to elect their own project leaders and managers based on merit and knowledge. This model includes safeguards like recall votes to prevent "analysis paralysis" or "mob rule" while ensuring management remains accountable to the workforce. Such systems typically require a probationary period to ensure new members are honest and capable before granting them full voting rights.

Evidence from Alaska and the Social Security system suggests that guaranteed income increases civic engagement and voting rates among recipients. When citizens have a financial stake in a government program, they are more likely to participate in the political process to protect it. UBI could transform a disempowered population into an engaged electorate, shifting the government's focus from the interests of the wealthy to the needs of the general citizenry.

The current economic system fosters "learned helplessness," a psychological state where people feel they have no power to change their circumstances even when opportunities exist. Low-income individuals vote at significantly lower rates (30%) compared to high earners (80%), often due to this sense of disempowerment. By providing a basic income, the state could break this cycle of helplessness and allow people to take back control of their lives and communities.

Greg Carlwood addresses listener feedback regarding the efficacy of voting, arguing that while the national system is flawed, local elections for issues like marijuana legalization and public transit are vital tools for influence. He expresses a desire to bring on guests from the Flat Earth movement, such as Mark Sargent, and mentions an upcoming interview with Graham Hancock. He encourages listeners to focus on actionable local changes rather than just complaining about large-scale conspiracies like chemtrails.

The House of Representatives is identified as the most effective branch for citizens to influence because members are elected every two years and control the federal budget. Shifting focus from the presidency to local congressional representatives allows for faster political change, as these officials represent smaller populations and are more sensitive to voter pressure. Every seat in the House is up for election every two years, providing a frequent opportunity to replace untrustworthy officials.

Mainstream media coverage often focuses on "pageant" topics like the Kardashians, Planned Parenthood, or the 2016 election debates while ignoring significant legislation and international conflicts in Syria. Many bills in the House are passed via "voice vote" under a suspension of the rules, a tactic that prevents a recorded vote and shields individual congressmen from accountability. Over the summer of 2015, a significant majority of bills were passed using this method to avoid public scrutiny.

The guest analyzes the phenomenon of individuals voting against their own self-interest, specifically women who support Donald Trump despite his derogatory comments. Marie D. Jones compares modern political and religious leaders to cult figures like David Koresh and Jim Jones. The segment explores how shared traits, such as gender or race, are used to build "teams" that bypass critical thinking.

Greg Carlwood suggests that many Americans suffer from a form of Stockholm Syndrome, continuing to support a system that offers them little freedom or financial security. Marie D. Jones attributes this to a lifetime of bombardment by rhetoric and media messages, resulting in total cognitive dissonance. This psychological state is described as a survival mechanism that allows individuals to function despite systemic abuse and constant surveillance.