Topic: Vaers

Joe Atwell details the Harvard Pilgrim Study, which allegedly found that the VAERS system only captures 1% of vaccine side effects. He proposes that RFK Jr. should use AI and modern computing to correlate hundreds of millions of hospital records dating back to the 1940s. This large-scale data analysis would aim to provide definitive answers on the links between vaccines and conditions like autism.

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is detailed as a 30-year-old government-owned pharmacovigilance tool managed by the FDA and CDC. Despite public perception that the data is unreliable or easily spoofed, the reporting process requires significant time and rigorous vetting before appearing in the public database. Current data shows over 1.4 million reports for COVID-19 shots, a massive increase compared to the 30-year average of 39,000 reports for all other vaccines combined.

Forrest Maready discusses the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), noting that it is a voluntary and difficult system to navigate, likely capturing only a small fraction of actual injuries. He highlights a significant spike in reported deaths and heart issues in 2021 compared to all previous years of vaccine data. The segment mentions anecdotal reports of athletes collapsing on fields and increased business at funeral homes as potential indicators of widespread vaccine harm.

A theory is presented suggesting that up to 80% of initial COVID-19 vaccine doses may have been harmless saline solutions, explaining why not everyone experienced immediate side effects. The conversation notes that the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) likely only captures a small fraction of actual harms. There is a concern expressed that subsequent booster shots may contain higher concentrations of active synthetic materials.

Wayne Rohde critiques the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), noting that it is a passive system with no penalties for doctors who fail to report injuries. He cites studies suggesting only 1% to 5% of injuries are reported and expresses distrust in the CDC and FDA regarding the manipulation of clinical trial data for vaccines like Gardasil.

Host Greg Carlwood asks about the long-term time horizon for potential vaccine injuries. Northrup discusses the possibility of prion disease and "mad cow disease" as irreversible side effects. She speculates that a percentage of the injections may have been placebos and argues that the VAERS database significantly underreports the actual number of adverse events and deaths.

The discussion covers data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), noting reports of deaths, serious injuries, and Bell's palsy. Elliott cites a Harvard study suggesting that less than 1% of adverse reactions are actually reported. He also criticizes the CDC for changing policy to only count "breakthrough cases" that result in hospitalization or death.

Analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) reveals a significant spike in mortality following the rollout of COVID-19 shots. Specific risks such as thrombosis, which led to the temporary withdrawal of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, are discussed alongside long-term concerns like Lupus and Bell's Palsy. The segment references past SARS vaccine animal studies where ferrets suffered lethal hyper-immune responses upon re-exposure to natural infection.

A Harvard Pilgrim study suggests that the VAERS system captures less than one percent of actual vaccine adverse reactions, implying the true injury numbers are significantly higher than reported. Furthermore, imperfect vaccines are described as creating genetic selection pressure that drives the emergence of resistant viral variants. This cycle is compared to antibiotic resistance, where the industry profits from creating new strains that require further vaccination.

The loss of taste and smell, often associated with COVID-19, is identified by Clive DeCarle as a classic symptom of zinc deficiency. He critiques the reliability of PCR testing and discusses the underreporting of vaccine injuries in the UK's Yellow Card scheme and the US VAERS system. DeCarle claims that many doctors fail to report adverse reactions, leading to a significant gap between official data and the reality of vaccine-related injuries.

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is criticized for significantly undercounting vaccine injuries, with a Harvard Medical School study suggesting it captures less than 1% of actual events. Automated tracking at the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care HMO revealed an injury rate of approximately 10%, a stark contrast to the "one in a million" claim often cited by health officials. According to the segment, the CDC ceased communication with Harvard researchers once the high frequency of injuries became apparent, effectively halting the automation project.

The authors critique a metric used in trials called "new medical conditions," which they argue was designed to dismiss serious health issues as unrelated to the vaccine. They also point out that trial participants were a highly selected group of the "healthiest of healthy" individuals, which does not reflect the general population.

The authors discuss the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), noting that it is a passive system prone to severe underreporting. They cite a Harvard Pilgrim Group study suggesting only 1% of injuries are reported and mention approximately 430 deaths linked to the vaccine in the system.