Dr. Jessica Rose | The Latest Numbers On The True COVID Vaccine Fallout & Suspicious Activity In The VAERS Database

00:05 In the 1930s, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt addressed the nation through a series of radio broadcast known as the Fireside Chats. His aim was to reassure the common man that our society would recover from its troubled times. From 1930 and I deal with a different kind of fire For a new era of worldly frustration we offer a- I'm Greg Carlwood These are The Hireside Chats It's a beautiful day in the neighborhood, dear people of the internet. From sunny San Diego I'm Greg Carlwood and while we are all probably quite exhausted with going over what it was that happened in the COVID crisis from the masks and social distancing to the lockdowns and media hype

00:49 Not to mention where it came from, how faulty the testing was, who might have developed it and where all the fingers should be pointing. The reality is that it all culminated in the majority of human beings on this planet coerced into accepting a new largely untested technology into their bodies Social pressure was applied, Hollywood influencers were paid to endorse it. The PR machine was dialed up to 11 jobs travel and even general participation in society were all threatened and people's fears were preyed upon until they were lining up for the jabs We were told you will not get sick if you have these shots And that quickly proved to be untrue But any dissenting doctors were removed from the discourse as two shots became three or four who knows how many

01:33 But whatever you think about COVID, viruses masks or bioweapons labs no matter how non-compliant some of us might have been we all admit that our fathers and mothers sisters and brothers friends and even lovers in many cases opted for a different decision when it comes to these shots. And with media cover stories like a new mysterious sudden adult death syndrome normalizing heart attacks in young people and glossing right over the athletes dying on the field and a large number of musicians cancelling tours, it's clear we won't get the truth from them. Which is why today we're talking to the great Dr. Jessica Rose, a Canadian researcher with a bachelor's degree in applied mathematics and a master's degree in immunology She holds a PhD in computational biology and two postdoctoral degrees one in molecular biology and one in biochemistry

02:21 And she has been applying all her expertise to studying the best available data when it comes to the mRNA shot fallout since day one. It's an honor to have the best person I know of, to answer some questions about just how risky and dangerous these shots have truly been. So let's get into it! The Data Deconstructor Risk Assessment Expert & Safety Signal Seeking Surfer Dr Jessica Rose Welcome to The Higher Side That was awesome. I try, it really is an honor. Oh well thanks! I'm just a regular Joe but i really like that title you gave me. I want to steal that. Hey it's yours!

03:06 Well, you know I have interviewed just so many guests with different opinions about nearly every aspect of the whole COVID crisis and what it is or what it wasn't. But my biggest remaining questions are all about what should we expect to happen to our loved ones who did get these shots and how many will be affected? So this is really going to be a deep dive into the available information to help us hone in on that stuff. And you are a perfect guest to do that, obviously people should get a sense of that from your credentials but help those unfamiliar get an even better grasp on your expertise in this area and the attention you've paid to the data since these shots rolled out in December 2020 just two years ago? Well I have

03:52 I have an interesting background. I started my academic career in applied mathematics and I applied my mathematics to immunology, so i got an immunology degree in medicine and then I went on to do a computational biology PhD which kind of blended those two degrees and gave me more experience with big data analysis And then I also did a couple postdocs in biochemistry and molecular biology. So what I've been doing during this, during the past two years or so has involved aspects of each of these learning experiences that I've had and it started really early even before they announced this so-called pandemic in March 2020... was it 2020? Yeah geez!

04:54 Yeah, I had plans. I had just completed my second postdoc and I had plans to go surfing for a while and to unwind. And I go through periods in my life where I work really hard for a few years and then I use the artistic or the physical side of myself as a treat So that got called off because it basically overlapped with the proclamation of the pandemic. So yeah, I needed to find something to do. I decided to teach myself R which is a statistical programming language that you can use to generate really pretty pictures and in order to do that i decided that i'd use a real data set and because of what i had been seeing going on around me

05:47 that things weren't lining up and yeah, it was pretty easy to see very soon into 2020 that this was not about a dangerous zoonotic pathogen. This was about something far more insidious you know population or controlling people basically so I decided that since the line of thinking of these so-called public health policy makers that there was only one way out of this, which was everybody getting injected with an experimental product. I thought to myself well maybe the perfect database to look at is the adverse event reporting system in the United States because i anticipated that there were going to be a lot of reports coming in in the context of the shots—the experimental shots

06:47 And to make a long story short, I wasn't wrong. So that's my background and that's kind of how we got involved in this. It's been years and I'm still doing exactly what I was doing from the beginning an it hasn't slowed down at all. I'm actually right now at this exact moment in time meant to be sitting beside Senator Johnson during his hearing he's having a live hearing now to talk just like this just like I'm talking to you guys right now but what's been going on those plans got diverted unwillingly as well. But yeah, I've just been non-stop. Yes you have and their loss is my gain I suppose and that is a really good setup and before we get into the latest numbers talk to us about VAERS in general the U.S vaccine adverse events reporting system there are a lot of misconceptions about this system I've had people tell me

07:46 We've given out millions of shots in this country and nobody has gotten hurt. And then I send them a VAERS link, and they say that's not credible. Anyone can fill out a report and say they turned into Godzilla after taking the shot." There are a lot of trolls in there messing up the data. I know this isn't true but it is the perception out there for some people so talk to us about VAERS credibility and the process of making a VAERS report that lets us know this can be trusted Well, here's the thing. VAERS is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System of the United States. It's about 30 years old. Its inception came about as a trade-off for the fact that pharmaceutical companies producing vaccines have complete immunity from liability. This is a government owned database doesn't get more serious than that it's the FDA CDC HHS

08:45 brainchild. And yes, it's a passive reporting system which means that anyone can file the report however people should know that it takes about 30 minutes of your time to successfully file a temporary VAERS report And it's not as simple as just taking a half an hour. It's an online system with multiple pages, and if you don't fill out each page on time, you get booted off, you got to start again. So to successfully file a VAERS report takes a lot of effort. Then that gets a temporary ID and it's vetted. There is a very serious rigorous process

09:27 that someone has to go to in order to successfully get a report onto the front end database which is the data that I analyze people who are saying, The things that they've heard other people say is how I'll put it. They're not correct about theirs. VAERS is called a pharmacovigilance tool, which means that it is designed and was designed to detect safety signals in data that were not detected in pre-market testing. And I got to tell you after looking at this for two years It's functioning perfectly in doing that. The number of safety signals being emitted from VAERS right now is, no not even now after one month of these products being rolled out into United States into American citizens there were enough safety signals as defined by previous definitions to shut this thing down to stop the rollout and I'm referring to the fact that we had exceeded more than 50 reports

10:32 In, in not even in temporal proximity but they were in the context of the Pfizer the Moderna and the Jensen shots. This is a it's a fully functioning system right now, and there are over 1.4 million reports about adverse events in the context of just the coven shots since they started the rollout. And this is in stark contrast to the last 30 years of data, now listen to what I'm about to say for all vaccines combined and there are a lot of them on the schedule for kids especially, for all vaccines combined for the last 30 years the average total number of adverse event reports was about 39 000 so

11:22 Even if you're going to claim that a number of people were submitting false reports and getting them onto the front end system successfully, was that really done 1.4 million times? And how many times above the background? I don't think so. Right. So and that's not even the real point. The real point is since this data belongs to the FDA, the CDC and HHS why aren't they raising these issues, doing these analysis. Doing causality assessments like they always have in the past. Where's the regulation? Right it seems like instead of regulation we're just getting a lot of damage control every weird article you see it just gets less and less believable I've even seen some people claiming well the reason that more vaccinated people are in the hospital now is because the unvaccinated are stressing them out

12:19 They don't know who in the grocery store is unvaccinated. They're getting so stressed, they're putting themselves in the hospital." They really are coming up with everything and then sudden adult death syndrome? It's like what the hell is that it really makes you wonder what SIDS is if SADS is this other cover story anyway but yes I just wanted to point out that all the reports are vetted before they get to you. That 1.4 million that you see, those are reports that have been filed and then looked at and then given to the front end. And it's also very serious to file a false report. This is the CDC. You can actually go to prison for filing false reports. So the reality with those two things and more is that VAERS data is grossly underreported. That would be the tendency not over-reported

13:08 First off, many regular folks don't know about VAERS. Then if they do they have to tell their doctor about their problem and doctors are kind of conditioned to not connect any problem with the shots so there are several layers a person with an adverse event must go through And I'm told doctors are encouraged not to fill out too many VAERS reports or they get themselves on the radar? I don't know about that but there've been studies done and estimates made How do you typically square up what the system shows with what is probably the real world reality? Yeah, first of all. Those are excellent points. Probably the worst thing about VAERS is this underreporting factor and I can tell you with certainty that doctors are being incentivized not to file either by choice or

13:59 Because they're just unwilling to admit the reality that there's even a possibility of a connection, which is ludicrous because no doctor would deny the reality of an anaphylactic reaction you know if it happens subsequent to giving someone in injection I mean come on. You know, most people would say the way that you get around that problem is to just take the absolute counts multiply them by an underreporting factor. So then the problem becomes well what's the under reporting factor? I've calculated this based on Pfizer phase three clinical trial data from severe adverse events and i came to a number of 31 which is not far off from

14:49 another estimate done by Matthew Crawford and me and Steve Kirsch, which was 41 by a different method. And so I mean you can absolutely integrate the underreporting factor into calculations but i have to make a strong point here because the numbers, the absolute counts are so high you don't even have to consider the under reporting factor the number of reports are and I'm not just talking total, if you look at standalone adverse events. Oh by the way it's not just the absolute counts in bears that are staggeringly a typical its range

15:35 In prior years, you might see thousands like a few thousand different types of adverse event reports being filed. We call them measure codes preferred terms and in the context of the COVID products last time I counted which was months ago there were over 14 000 out of a total of 25 used 25 000 so The number, the range of adverse event types that we're seeing in the context of these products is also staggeringly alarming. If you look at just about anything physiological that can go wrong in the human body, you will find it associated with these products. It's crazy! The damages being reported and temporal proximity to the injections are systemic and it's affecting the heart, liver, lungs

16:30 the muscles, the skin, the eyes. Everything you can think of and so I mean you can pick anything you want! You can talk about myocarditis which everybody knows about now because of this fiasco. You can look at cancer or you can look at anything you want i mean...you name it! The numbers are off the charts when you look at the past 30 years of data Right it's not send not to be too conspiratorial about the point you just made but when i think about those people who are. Kind of really extreme saying this is a bio weapon that everybody's gonna die and i don't think its necessarily that everybody's gonna die but if i think about, a person trying to engineer some weapon to injure a lot of people

17:21 that is what you want to something that has a wide range of injuries are really abnormally wide range of potential injury so that. Everything's in the gray don't really know it is associated as that associated there such a wide range i mean thats, That's just really wild. It was a curious thing, I guess that ended up happening. But to clarify what you said—to compensate for the underreporting—the conservative estimate is that you'd multiply the numbers by a factor of 31? Is that right? That's right!

17:56 Man, and then there are other factors affecting the data like a major backlog of reports that have not been added to the system as well as some data manipulation. I've heard you talk about certain codes being removed or going missing how big a deal are those two things? Yeah they're really big deals but just to go back to what we were just talking about You don't even have to go down the conspiratorial path There's a link between all of these these problems and it's the immune system itself. So in fact, if you can cause immune dysregulation or induce immune dysregulation somehow you would see this kind of haywire anyway we can come back to that but I just wanted to throw that in there because it's a really important point and I'm working on an article now that would shed some light on that too so yeah there's

18:58 First of all, there are two data sets that you can download as part of the VAERS system. There's the domestic data which are the reports filed by Americans within America and there is the foreign data which are reports filed by Americans and others directly to many of the pharmaceutical companies and they subsequently submit reports to VAERS And you can imagine in that process, the development of a backlog considering the numbers we're talking about is massive. It's very real and big. So typically every Friday the VAERS data is updated and so both of these files they're separate files that you can download for analysis are updated as well. About a month ago me and my compatriots who also analyze VAERS data noticed that the foreign data

19:53 file size was really reduced. Every week, the file sizes both go up because there are more reports, more numbers of people. That particular week we noticed real big change less than half the size that it was let alone not having increased. First thought was well wow did they remove like more than half of the people? So I looked inside and no, that wasn't it. Still got this many. And so I looked a little further and then noticed that there was a new disclaimer on the website saying that quote unquote European regulators had ordered the CDC in the FDA to remove symptom text fields and all texts fields that lend additional information pertaining to allergies or side effects previous conditions

20:53 And it's from these fields that we get a lot of important information. It's like when the doctor scribbles down the notes about what happened, that's all that important information you can glean... You can diagnose using that information and sometimes it's so thorough and if nothing else you can get age data gender data, Vaxlot data all this important information So for over 100 000 people that data was all disappeared. It's just vanished, and there wasn't even a word in the place of the text that was missing as in not applicable or missing or transferred. There is not even a note. It was just gone. What that did on the analytical side to the data... Just to give you a specific example I'll bring up myocarditis again

21:54 I've discovered from VAERS data that there's a dose response associated with myocarditis, with these shots. What that means is that if you have someone who has had two doses the number of reports being filed to VAERS following dose 2 in very young people is like five times as high as after dose 1 so what I found in the foreign data was the same thing except for dose 3 and across the entire spectrum of age groups. It wasn't only for young people, it was across all ages so what happened when they scrubbed this data was that that entire safety signal being emitted very strongly from VAERS I mean it's very rare that you see something that clear from data...it was just gone! So if you went to VAERS as a new

22:54 a new investigator and you went to the foreign data to find a safety signal for myocarditis following dose three, he wouldn't see it. And there's no reason given why they did that and there is no information as to if that information was passed to another dataset such as the yellow card system where perhaps maybe it did belong but yeah its incredible I mean their such obvious examples of the data being, for lack of a better word manipulated. And on the subject to the backlog I wrote a paper well over a year ago it was probably a year and half ago that investigated the pharmacovigilance-ness of VAERS whether or not it was actually functioning as a pharmacovigilance tool and one of the things I looked at was this backlog how many

23:56 temporary IDs had been given to people who filed reports, who have never received a VAERS ID that ended up in the front end system. And it turns out that number is very large back then so now I can't even imagine how big it is. I've been saying off the top of my head about 1 million so it's possible there are like I would bet money that there's at least a million reports floating around in the backlog, which means that again without even considering an under-reporting factor you have a million reports that were probably filed. People took the effort, the medical professionals made the effort to do it but they're in limbo. They're in temporary ID vares land and not only that

24:50 But there are people who have filed reports, gotten to the front end system with their full on VAERS ID whose reports have been disappeared. We have proof of this Wow. I mean, that's incredible and so you have all these factors that would go against the grain like doctors not wanting to file on people not knowing about it then they have to be filled out exactly perfectly and then they have to be verified and then there are still some removed So there is just so many things here that its like any numbers we should take very seriously And instead of mocking VAERS and dismissing those reports

25:29 People should ask themselves, if you don't think bears is credible in your mind then what do we have? Just nothing and are you comfortable with nothing because that's what you're left with. So this is the best we have and we just got to kind of accept it. You nailed it buddy exactly! And just to nail that home There literally is nothing. Like, I'm very good friends with many people who are actually clinical trial participants one of them is Bree Dressen and she took the AstraZeneca thing as part of the trial and got injured And her whole life now... Her entire life

26:09 has become dedicated to trying to get anyone, the Pfizer- I'm sorry AstraZeneca people the FDA or the CDC. To even acknowledge that she's been injured to maybe help her with medical bills that she's been incurring for years that she still incurring the whole reason she participated in the trial was to be a good human being and to lend herself as part of the experiment, to create data points. The fact that they've erased her and are not using any of her vital data points to assess the true dangers or risks or whatever you want to call it

27:00 It's outrageous and if people simply knew that, it's like listen you think this is safe and effective? You should really find out how they're running the clinical trials. And how they're treating the people who actually did get injured in their trials. They're being ignored Oh man, it's just one thing after another that really makes you think about this stuff. And to get deeper into the numbers so you say we have 1.4 million total reports let's say there is roughly a million in the backlog I mean that is a lot and then times that by a factor of 31 We're saying there might be 62 million adverse events of some kind just in America?

27:44 I wouldn't be surprised. It's almost as if you can not know someone now who hasn't been injured or doesn't know someone who hasn't been, it's not like what is that called six degrees of separation? It's like one. Yeah right well when i look at the deaths... So for every year from 2011 to 2020 VAERS death reports have a range from 120 to 183 this is obviously the top bar graph on your website, but in 2021 slash 2022 it jumps to just shy of 40,000. So that is quite a lot then I looked up

28:30 What percentage of the us population got the first two doses they say seventy percent i don't know if you can trust that i think that's also like a psychological manipulation hey everybody is doing it but, if that's right that's roughly two hundred and forty million people they say so. If we times the 40,000 by 31 that's 1.24 million let's just say one million that you know we're saying like one out of 240 people who got two doses could be dead Yeah, but I want to make a point here. We have to lower that number because the underreporting factor for death is definitely lower than 31 in my opinion. Okay. Death is probably less under-reported than even other severe adverse events so I've been kind of going with 10 somewhere between 6 and 10 for an under reporting factor for death but still if you do that math

29:31 I wouldn't be surprised if it's that high. Crazy! I've done calculations, yeah to calculate like the rate of severe adverse event occurrence and it sounds in line with that. A lot of people are being injured and you make a good point about the fact that yes, a lot of them are in temporal proximity to the injections but a lot of them aren't. A lot of them are happening months later people who are suffering re-emergences of cancers, for example. Sometimes that's not happening until well after say the second or third or fourth shots and we have no idea like we have no predictability here in terms of when something is going to happen if it's going to happen this is the most appalling thing to me because with all this wasted time and money and resources and energy

30:32 propagating this insane dictatorship-like message of there's only one solution, it's safe and effective. We could actually be doing really good bench work to figure out like okay why did 15% or so of the population react really badly to this stuff? You know what I mean? Yeah, that was gonna be one of my questions is if we have any information about demographics. Some people being hit harder than others or categories based on age or gender race or anything? Yeah this points to something that I did want to mention as to the mechanism of action of some of the shots because first of all i'd like to just clarify that we have no freaking idea what's in the needle

31:25 you know, with the stuff being injected into every single arm. We have no idea because it's not being checked. It's definitely not being checked with the frequency that it should be being checked when you're talking about billions and billions of doses and vials. And we can talk about that too but the point is the mechanism of action... Jeez I lost my thought now damnit Well, we're gonna talk about demographics I think and how we can look at who's being injured and why some people are and some aren't. Right sorry, I'm old age, I forget stuff. Yeah so I think what's happening here as I mentioned before like the node of damage is definitely immune dysregulation and I think what we're seeing among other things you know like spike induced damage is something called immunological senescence

32:27 When we age, there are a number of factors that are responsible for things getting older. But one of the things that happens is probably combination of result and because-of is that our immune system also ages. This doesn't always have to be linked to chronological age if you have a really shitty diet and say, you have genetic predisposition to being obese then you're probably much older immunologically than a really healthy four-year old. Just as an example so this aging process of the immune system is really relevant here You can actually get something called clonal exhaustion whereby your T cells or B cells

33:24 you know, they activate and proliferate to such an extent that they can't do it anymore. This is what happens when you naturally age so I think something in these shots might be causing premature immunological aging which would explain why we're seeing latent viruses coming back to life and cancer re-emergences etc It's interesting also because we do see much higher death rates in older people. So it's almost like, I think senescence is definitely a factor here that's why it takes down the old people first and then it takes maybe a little longer or a few more shots not in all cases but in some cases to take out the infirm

34:21 or people with autoimmune conditions, or cancers, or some pre-existing condition. And then who knows? Maybe a perfectly healthy person can be taken down eventually. I don't know. It comes back down to the first thing I said which was we have no freaking idea what's being injected into people on an individual level. We really don't. That's not speculation it's fact It is and great points a lot of that is really important information you mentioned the cancer thing that is something I've heard several cancer specialists talking about that they're like hey there's a lot of people coming in and these cancers are fast acting their way different than

35:06 You know, the typical progression of a cancer that we've been looking at our whole careers. Someone ought to look at this and the possible connection and psychologically that's another factor how many people are even connecting that because people are conditioned to think well some people it's a roll of dice you just get cancer or if you've had cancer sometimes it's a roll the dice it just comes back It can't be related to the shot I got six months ago. And so that's another thing, but also with deaths people have all sorts of opinions about that new film died suddenly but in it they talk about coroners who are pulling these white strands from people's veins and arteries not technically a blood clot because it's a foreign thing that's causing the blockage of blood flow but the coroners are saying

35:55 These sudden deaths by stroke or heart attack, they're not getting autopsies. Nobody is seeing this stuff until they go to prepare the body for a funeral and just like so many people were counted as killed by COVID because of PCR test positive despite whatever reason they were really in the hospital for The opposite is happening here and a heart attack is just a heart attack, no official association but clearly something new is happening to these people. Yep you nailed it again, you don't need me! Man... It's scary. It's more than scary, it's incredible. It's inexplicable to me at this point and I really think about this a lot how it could be possible

36:48 that a and the answers in the words I'm saying now for a thinking medical doctor not to Do a differential diagnosis which would include naturally Anything new that that person might have been injected with recently. So The key word there is thinking Mm-hmm, and I think I've heard you say in previous interviews that Around 80% of the adverse events are within a certain time window of 48 or 36 hours, or something like that.

37:28 Which is great to be able to see that close of a link, but then we do have this other range. I guess it's really hard to put a number on it because if these cancers are associated, if these heart attacks and stuff that are happening months and months later are associated...I guess it really is hard to put a number on it but the best guess is 80%. I don't know if it's that high and it depends what you're talking about, but like You're talking about the temporal proximity from injection to onset of symptom, right? Correct. Yeah so it's between closer to 50%-60% in most of the standalone adverse events. In anaphylaxis it's like 90 something which is good! It's like a internal control for the assessment of data this way but yeah its way higher than I would consider

38:25 something outside of the realm of at least something that needs to be investigated for a causal effect. I mean, these are the kinds of safety signals that you literally look for in pharmacovigilance databases to do causality assessments like there's this thing called the Bradford Hill criteria which It's independent from COVID. There are things that have existed outside of COVID, and this is a way to determine whether or not you can provide evidence of a causal effect in epidemiological data so One of these that's very important is temporality. So did something come before something, first of all? Because in order to have a causal relationship you have to have one thing preceding the next and the shorter the time frame between those things more likely a causal effect is present so these are the things that The Who for example assess

39:24 in pharmacovigilance data. They even have their own, they have a form. They have their own assessment criteria and you only have to satisfy five out of 10 of the Bradford Hill criteria in order to get a very likely prognosis so I've actually proven ten of the ten points, the criteria using VAERS data and other pharmacovigilance databases and case studies It's just one of those things, it's like why aren't you doing this again? Why aren't you looking at cause-effect relationships. Why aren't you looking at the temporal aspects? Why are you looking at specificity? Why aren't you looking at plausibility? Why aren't you looking at...it just goes on and on if the regulators and the watchdogs as Peter McCullough always calls them were doing their jobs

40:23 this would have been shut down a long time ago. It's like they're too far in now and it's like okay I know that i'm drowning so I might as well drown loudly and annoyingly. Oh man And so if we can say that these shots are just like a wrecking ball to the general immune system. And so if you get one, you did some damage. If you get two, that damage is amplified three even moreso well on your website, you have the total number in each category for the original recipe shots and then a bracketed number for the updated shots that they made later. Is there anything to be said about the difference in risk profile between the two? Well, it's a good thing you bring up here. So for those of you who don't know, the injection rate of the so-called bivalent shots looks pretty good either that or they're way more dangerous than the original chicken recipe

41:26 Just so that people know, the bivalent refers to the original Wuhan strain which is long since extinct and either the Omicron B4 or 5 spike which is also long since extinct. So they're using proteins that have no relevance anymore but here's the thing, the annoying part about making any assessment Using bears data in the context of these by valent products is that they're designed to be injected into people as a third or fourth or fifth dose, they're calling that booster.

42:09 So if someone files a VAERS report, like say they got myocarditis diagnosis following this bivalent crap but they've already had three shots of the other stuff we cannot attribute the myocarditis to the bivalent shot because the damage could have really been done by the other three shots. It's really hard to say anything specifically if anything is specifically attributed to the bivalent shots, I would say that it is. But there's no way to determine that using the VAERS data but also you guys should know that the rate of reporting of the bivalent shots is really high we're over 10 000 if I'm remembering correctly...I'm just going on to my website yeah there's only over ten thousand reports since they started coming in

43:06 I think it was November 18th, so just about a month ago. No that was when... Anyway it's been about a month I guess, a little over a month and you know it's just like it was when the reports started rolling in for the first version of the shots in VAERS exponential growth curve every week. The number is going up but the point I'm trying to make here is that the numbers are going up more steeply It appears so, unfortunately because of the fact that everything is a big bloody mess probably by design we can't really say again that things are attributed specifically to this bivalent thing which is the stupidest thing I ever heard of in my whole life. By the way it's stupider than the original shot idea

44:01 Well, you know I'm also hearing people talking about the Fluster that they're going to combine the yearly flu shot with the boosters. I don't know if that's to market or anything like that but i've been at least hearing the conversation on mainstream media talking head channels that we could be getting a fluster so you're gonna get a double dose every year to guard you against the things that come around again Yeah, I can guarantee you they're not going to do that. So if you're listening and you care about what i'm saying You can trust me on that It ain't gonna protect you from anything And it seems that the harms being reported in association with these products far far far outweigh any Benefit you might receive anyway Take that to the bank

44:48 Yes, I agree with that. Not that we'll have banks for very much longer but... Yes the digital currency wallet that you might have So what about the categories that involve the reproductive system? I've heard you talk about the spike proteins accumulating in the ovaries and testicles, and that we had a study almost 10 years ago that told us this would happen. That's something I pulled off one of your slides that was interesting but what can we say about issues relating to these sex organs and fertility? Well, we can say a lot first thing I'd like to say is that we were told from the very beginning

45:29 by everyone, the policy makers, the officials that three letter agencies the legacy media. That you know whatever was injected was going to stay at the injection site and perhaps go to local draining lymph node and it would be degrade quickly and voila, you have immunity and no more product in your body. That was a lie it wasn't just false it was a lie because they had the data that was later FOIA requested and revealed to the public mostly by me screaming about it I'm just kidding Byron Bridle Canadian viral immunologist was the original FOIA requester of this Japanese study he's one of my heroes he's great

46:18 Also, Aaron Seery's team demanded Pfizer data be requested by FOIA. So what this data revealed is that not only do the lipid nanoparticles which are the fat carrier molecules of the modified mRNA not stay at the injection site but they absolutely biodistribute and bioaccumulate and one of the organs that they bioaccumulate in to the highest levels are the ovaries Do we know the implications of this? No. Do we know the implications of the delivery of the payload, of the modified mRNA and subsequent translation to massive amounts of spike protein in the ovaries? No. Do we know the effects of that happening in the adrenals? No. Spleen? No. Liver? No. So just imagine if you will

47:10 that perhaps it could cause a problem. How would those problems manifest physiologically? Well, I can imagine a few ideas right well actually i see them all the time in bears so yeah the fertility issue is it's a very pending and scary one because of what i just said we know a lot more because of some articles that have been published in the peer-reviewed literature now about what's going on with the spike protein, one of the things that we found out was that the mRNA can reverse transcribe to DNA using a retrotransposon or reverse transcriptase called line 1. And the reason that's concerning beyond the obvious reason is because line one is implicated in embryogenesis so

48:09 during the embryogenetic phases, this line one has to be at specific expression levels. And if they're off during any one of those stages then you can have an embryo genetic halt which means termination of embryogenesis so in fact line 1 expression levels do vary in the context of the spike protein it begs the necessary question, are the reports of stillbirths and spontaneous abortions and miscarriages. Do these have anything to do with the injections? It's just a really point A to point B question. And it should have been answered very clearly before this crap went into any arms

49:08 And what's even scarier is that it's being promoted as safe for pregnant women and there is absolutely zero, 0.00 data to support that claim but in fact there is a lot of data to support the fact that it's probably not safe to do so But ultimately, what we really need is long-term safety data which we don't have and didn't have at the time that these people were promoting that these products are safe for pregnant women. We never do that! Pregnant women and even lactating women are always... And women of childbearing age are always on exclusion criteria lists in clinical trials. Always.

49:55 and these products were no exception. So how is it possible that within six months, instead of 15 years of testing we can now say to a pregnant woman, yeah they're fine, Mia's not going to affect your fetus? It's criminal lies because there's no person on planet earth that can say that definitively because they can't back it up with data Yeah it's true and i mean how many times have we heard just on like every pharmaceutical ever even pretty simple stuff. Do not take if you're pregnant or plan on becoming pregnant. Like that's a phrase I've heard every pharmaceutical commercial repeat. Don't eat lettuce if you're pregnant, but get injected with experimental gene therapy. It is crazy and spontaneous abortions and miscarriages obviously are very sad but when it comes to

50:51 fertility of people who aren't even thinking about having a kid soon, it's going to be even harder to know. I mean how is anyone gonna know about the fertility of men in their early twenties who aren't thinking about that? Yeah exactly and on that point yeah you're right it's not just women A paper was published in Andrology that showed that the Pfizer product was causing men to have lower sperm counts and motility issues. Put that into perspective, I mean Jesus there's so many people who are having fertility issues anyway. I know so many people who do IVF because they're already having problems conceiving you know what i mean? So it's like do you really want to throw that gasoline on that fire even potentially

51:44 you know, the fact checkers were saying that no no it's just temporary don't worry about it. Even I think the authors of the paper said that it was temporary but do you really want to play that game? Right right. Especially if I wanted to have kids you know what I mean? So obviously you are focused on the data it is why you're here I appreciate that about you but What do we do going forward if we can't get the regulatory agencies to trigger a recall? Obviously, a lot of people have decided if they are or aren't going to continue on with this regimen of boosters. But it's like what is your best hope

52:31 for getting out of this mess? Is it just going to be a time thing or is there something that you actually are putting your faith behind, anything you're placing your bet on that can help us get out of this. Well, it's gonna be time because its numbers. It's just the numbers game now like there are people who were starting to listen to their hearts now. The ones who I said everybody knows something's wrong more and more people are starting to act on their suspicions. And that might mean they're just talking to their neighbor or asking questions, or just speaking out a little bit more in those ways. Or it could mean someone becoming far more active in the community to disseminate information about the possible dangers. So I think it's just a numbers game. Everyone is tired of this crap

53:34 Nobody likes being told what to do in the first place. So when they come around, they're going to come around real soon and try and pull all this nonsense again under the guise of climate change. You wait for it. It's coming. I hope that people aren't going to be as receptive gagged, injected, told to shut up and told to stay in their homes. It's so crazy when I say it like that but that's precisely what happened. You would never ever think the entire population of humans would ever do those four things but a lot of people did. We've forgotten the fact that we're autonomous beings

54:21 there are no authorities. I mean, some people's authority to them are God or Mother Nature or what have you but ultimately we don't have... No human has authority over you period! Not even policemen nobody does There is a big difference between legal and lawful People need to understand what that means It's not legal to do any of this shit. It's really not, you can't force someone to take an injection to keep their job so they can feed their kids it's crazy I'm going on a bit of a rant now. I like it! I wasn't gonna interrupt Yeah well as for the way out...I mean it's literally just about staying the course man The only difference between success and failure is persistence that's just my motto always has been

55:18 and try not to lose your shit along the way. I mean, if you're vaccine injured it's a lot harder not to lose your shit but there are communities forming mainly by the vaccine injured for the vaccine injured to help and these are communities of people that do include medical professionals who can, you know, not only help with with the injuries but perhaps clearing the spike out as well React 19 is a really good one, just to give Brie a little shout out there. So there's a lot of hope I still believe in the good of people. I think that it's a mistake to think that these globalist morons have as much power as we're giving them they have no power The only power that they have is the power that we're giving them so all we have to do is take it back Literally That's the answer It's just a bunch of people like a handful of people

56:18 who have an excess of money. So it's meaningless if you look at what's meaningful in life, unfortunately they don't seem to value life very much by their own words so yeah just reclaim everybody needs to just reclaim themselves and just be as human as possible because I also think i firmly believe that in the mess of the last two years there was a real attempt to dehumanize humans, to take the human... Yes okay! To take the human out of humanity. This isolation and you know shut up put your mask on and you can't see your family for Christmas You can't see her grandma when she's dying. You can't bury her when she's dead etc so be more human that's always a good solution Be kind

57:24 be open-minded with everyone. There's nothing that the dividers love more than dividing people, so as hard as your instinct might be to fight with someone about anything related to the subject matter try not to do that. Try to bridge gaps as much as you can because ultimately it's us together. Not to sound corny but the only way we're going to get through this is together Well said and i heard you in a previous interview say that you wholeheartedly believe this plan of the globalist is gonna fail cuz they didn't factor in the human spirit and I agree that's a sentiment. A lot of our guests have brought up and

58:11 It's what we have to go on at this point. And also in a previous interview, I heard you say that it's either only these shots causing these problems or these shots plus something else and i'm just curious what else would be worth considering as a factor? Maybe something that we could potentially avoid. You mean in causing damages? Yes. Other shots pre-existing condition of a certain kind. I wouldn't even rule out EMF radiation, I'm not going there today but we have definitive evidence in peer reviewed journals that certain kinds of EMF radiation can induce cancer so... We don't know the combined effects of certain things. We haven't ruled out

59:11 the counter indications. So yeah, there's no real way to know it's anyone's guess at this point but yeah. Yeah that's what I thought you might say with the EMF because obviously if we have pre-existing conditions you can't really do much about that it's pre-existing but if you have family or friends who got the shot and you can keep their EMF environment a little more natural maybe A good thing i mean it's a good thing either way like you say we have some data that shows the stressor on the body in the immune system and its not good so would be. Positive change in a person's life regardless but if this is a one to punch kind of situation then let's do something to dampen that second punch i guess i would say

1:00:00 Before we run out of time, you mentioned one group React 19. What about other organizations or groups that you think are important to propelling the medical freedom movement forward? Not so much people who have been injured but the medical freedom movement in general I know you go to a lot of conferences and you speak at events what groups would you cite as like hey people support these groups know about these groups because they have the best chance fighting the good fight to help you have your medical freedoms. The FLCCC, the Canadian COVID Care Alliance, World Council for Health Solidarity in Science. Yeah. Oh gosh I'm forgetting so many I'm sure Mounties for Freedom I think. Yeah React 19 of course. I'm so sorry for the guys I'm forgetting.

1:01:05 It's late. All good, I would probably throw in Children's Health Defense they're doing a lot of great work obviously you host the show there. America's frontline doctors, they were a big group that were out there. But I'm hearing about some scandals in upper management, some embezzlement type stuff. I don't know if they're worth supporting financially anymore but they are a big group fighting for medical freedom or they were. Yeah, I am sure they still are definitely I haven't heard anything otherwise, so i'm sure they're still on the go. Yeah so there are places out there to throw your support if you want to make sure we have medical freedom in the future

1:01:50 And I suppose that is about all the time we have. I really, really appreciate your dedication to tracking this stuff. It is a true service to humanity before I cut you loose tell people about your website, your sub stack anything they might want to know about following up with you and keeping up on your reporting of the data as we get more and more. So if you want to see updated VAERS data and some papers that I've written on VAERS like that pharmacovigilance paper i mentioned. And all of the interviews that I've done, there's a lot now you can go to Jessica's Universe which is my website and I have two Substack newsletters one is jessicarr.substack.com which has more uh sciencey stuff and I have jessica5b3.substack.com which is more about current events

1:02:43 It's all like COVID crap because I mean, this is literally all I'm doing is fighting against the lie machine. Yeah man as sick as I am talking about it, I still get to talk about other things as opposed to you who just every day doing interviews like this so...I really do appreciate it because it is what we need and it is basically an information war at its heart and so we gotta get the information out there So you are a light in the darkness and I salute ya, the certified safety signal seeking surfer. Keep fighting the good fight and take care! That's awesome. This was a great interview. You almost didn't need me like I said. Thank you too kind. All right. I can't see you so I can't see if you're waving goodbye. Thanks a lot and anytime you want to

1:03:35 Do a follow-up. I'm available Great news, all right take care have a good one Bye And boom goes the dynamite once again Dr Jessica Rose Doing the lord's work she's out there every day combing over this data and i wanted to know now that we're pretty much exactly two years in what the fallout has been or at least what it is at this point Where is that truth between safe and effective, and instant death? Because to say it's an instant-death sentence is not really being honest. Right? Don't get me wrong I've never had a nice word to say about the shot Not one! And personal anecdotes are only worth so much but of the 50 closest people in my life at least 40 of them have gotten the first two So far nobody has had anything serious happen to them

1:04:32 I know a lot of people can't say the same, but my inner circle has suffered no problems thus far. And i am very thankful for that because they decided to take an untested and very risky technology into their bodies on blind faith with these kind of conversations we have in the conspirosphere. I just don't like the hyperbole And you get a lot of it, because it seems disingenuous to call out the perpetrators as liars and then over exaggerate the situation the other way. But I'll also be first to say that this story is not over yet! We don't know what's going on inside the bodies of our loved ones Two years is a long time for a spike protein factory to go off inside your body

1:05:18 But if you don't plan on having any more kids or like running ever then I think you're gonna be alright. And yes, I kid but strenuous activity from athletes to stage musicians seems to be one of those things that triggers all the bad stuff So i know that The Jab and Agenda 2030 get mentioned a lot it is what it is but you can't say we've done a full deconstruction of the adverse events and deaths data Maybe ever, but certainly not lately. So it's something we have to spend at least an episode on I mentioned RSV in this one and the hospital is filling up with all these kids...I think it was probably in the second hour But regardless the latest news apparently is kids just getting strep throat is enough now to be putting them in the hospital

1:06:10 Again, it just seems like general immunity failure really that covers all the bases. But I saw a few headlines about strep and flu and even scarlet fever now And yes, I know that if you step outside of the virus paradigm These are just collections of symptoms that have been named X Y or Z but i'm only saying That things kids used to just deal with are now killing them and that's some sad shit With the strep thing, I've also read that another contributing factor is this nasal flu vaccine they're giving to kids. But who really knows? Just leave big pharma alone as best you can right? I also did watch that Senator Ron Johnson hearing Jessica was supposed to be at it had all the heavy hitters there and damn just really impressive stuff almost could make a person believe something might actually be done about this

1:07:06 And have you guys also heard about the odd thread regarding Israel and the EU declaring that they can't actually find any signed agreement with Pfizer regarding all this? It's unclear to me if they're referring to legal protections or what, but it's sort of comical to start seeing this level of cover your ass coming out isn't it. It's like losing the data from the moon landing. Oh, we just can't find it! Like with a project this big if intentions were pure you'd think all the ducks would be in a row but now suddenly hey did uh... We even sign a document with Pfizer? I don't know and The reality is that people are dead and injured severely it's clearly very serious But that is such a lame and pathetic attempt to pass the buck that you got to roll your eyes at least

1:07:57 Then we got these silly stories like the unvaxxed are more likely to get in car accidents. Studies show! Why? Because the unvaxxed are actually out living their lives, not too scared to go out or sick in bed with COVID for the fifth time?! Is that why?? But I needed to hear from someone like Jessica so I could mentally prepare myself for what I might see in my own life. I hope you guys thought about it the same way because that is the spirit in which today's show was intended Also, that website I mentioned that I got really from Dr. Malone is howbadismybatch.com not How Bad Is My Lot? But if you can wrangle the lot number from your parents or spouses or whoever you care about You can look that up pretty easily and try to get a handle on how at risk they might be

1:08:44 Of course, as Jessica repeatedly said we just can't really know. This was rolled out in such a haphazard non-standardized way that we can't just trace lot numbers and get a true picture because there are many other factors There were so many untrained people putting shots in arms and drive throughs and baseball stadiums and pop up tents And we don't know if the needles were clean or if the vials were handled properly or diluted properly or if the needle was exasperated, or if it was even injected into a vein or muscle or any fucking place because people are so stupid and fail to realize that an injection is pretty serious matter. But I could go off on this all day and you just got two hours of shot talk so I won't make you sit through anymore except to say that in The Plus Show the things first hour listeners missed included the question of if anyone at the top truly knows The Fallout

1:15:18 gagged in my hands. Now I'm screwed, I'm so screwed but i still want it if I could stall get past these guys those documents would expose the lie cuz I know they've got a thousand files If I could just break tonight

1:16:03 So many coups, Bluebeam II and Morkans I was close to the prize But now these guys are wiping clean my precious memo Now i'm screwed. I'm so screwed But I still want If I could stall Get past these guys Those documents Would expose the lies

1:16:44 Cause I know they've got thousand files if i could just tonight I, I Just wanted to know. I Just wanted to see I, I Don't wanna let this go I, I don't

1:17:27 Get through the gate downtown, walking fast Security pass and I'm homebound Yeah well that was the plan but i got flagged Gagged in my hands Now I'm screwed I'm so screwed But I still want If I could stall get past these guys Those documents would expose the lies

1:18:10 Cause I know they've got files If i could just, if i could just pray tonight