Topic: Common Law

Gary Fraun predicts that a global financial collapse, specifically the fall of the US dollar, will be the catalyst for World War III. He contrasts the current "madmen" running the legal system with indigenous leadership models, such as the Aboriginal and American Indian systems, where chiefs were required to give away their possessions. He argues that a return to common law is necessary to escape the current "false flag reality."

Mike Cobb contrasts the legal and linguistic landscapes of Central American countries, noting that Belize is the most popular for North Americans due to its use of English and Common Law. He explains that most other countries in the region operate under Civil Law, a framework originally established by Napoleon. This legal distinction impacts how contracts are understood and how property rights are managed for foreign investors.

The discussion clarifies how non-profit associations handle earnings, noting that while they cannot pay private dividends, they can pay reasonable salaries to officers. Collum references a 14-point IRS guideline for maintaining legal status and explains that the Church at Renegade Ranch uses these rules to remain compliant. The PMA is described as a pass-through entity where taxation only occurs when funds are paid out to individuals.

The discussion traces the historical fusion of the Law Merchant and Common Law, noting that Lord Mansfield officially integrated the two in the late 1700s. Originally, the Law Merchant operated separately to handle transient maritime and trade disputes quickly, but over time, courts began treating all individuals as merchants. Washington argues that the creation of the birth certificate in the 1900s finalized this transition, allowing courts to use summary judgments instead of the strict proof required by pure common law.

Corey Eib analyzes the structure of California birth records, noting that mothers are often labeled as informants on the document. He suggests that the birth record is a state-owned instrument that guarantees 14th Amendment status while preventing citizenship in the several states. This legal framework moves individuals away from the Republican form of government and common law protections.

Todd McGreevey and Corey Eib advocate for creating a self-issued Article 4 state citizen ID based on the year a state entered the Union. They claim domicile in the original constitutional frameworks of their states, such as California 1849 or Iowa 1846, rather than the current administrative versions. This process requires individuals to research their specific state history and constitutional conventions to assert their own terms of identity.

Kevin Annett describes the formation of common law courts globally to issue indictments against predatory priests. He claims these courts are investigating international child trafficking and ritual sacrifice networks involving high-ranking Catholic officials. Annett encourages listeners to visit ITCCS.org to learn how to form local courts and take direct action against institutionalized crime, asserting that the law is being reclaimed by the people.

Barra critiques the intertwining of corporations and government, claiming they conspire to extort money through the court system. He advocates for a return to common law, suggesting that judges who assist in illegal property seizures should face severe penalties. He distinguishes between "lawyers" and "attorneys," whom he accuses of twisting the law for personal interest.

The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) was formed three years ago in Ireland to organize victims of Vatican-related crimes across international borders. Working with the Center for Constitutional Rights in New York, the group established a Common Law Court that issued a verdict against thirty top officials, including the Pope and several cardinals. The tribunal seeks legal accountability for global patterns of murder and rape covered up by church hierarchies.

Referencing Henry David Thoreau's civil disobedience, Annett encourages the establishment of local Common Law Courts with 12-person juries to determine justice outside of government statutes. He highlights "The Oath Keepers" within the military and police as a positive movement of individuals refusing to violate the Constitution. The goal is to reclaim the law from being a "hammer" over the people and return it to the service of natural justice.