Topic: Results

The host asks about a rare liqueur he drank with Gordon White, and the pendulum spells out "R-O-L-N-O," which he identifies as Rosolio, a floral Italian liqueur. He also receives a message for his listeners: "S-O-M-M-O-N," which he links to the Hebrew root "Shimon" (Simon), meaning "to hear" or "to listen." The host concludes that while his "signal" as a medium is shaky, the pendulum successfully moved on its own to provide interesting hits.

Host Greg Carlwood reflects on the interview, expressing some guilt for being combative with Daniel Pinchbeck. He clarifies that his excitement over the election results stems from the defeat of Hillary Clinton and the stopping of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) rather than support for Donald Trump. Carlwood notes the irony of Trump walking back campaign promises like the repeal of Obamacare and the prosecution of Clinton.

A case study involving a nurse illustrates how switching "ethereal software" can change the type of intuitions a person receives. While the nurse initially received trivial intuitions about parking or phone calls, Sententia helped her transition to a different software specialized for medical environments. This allowed her to accurately predict which patients would require emergency care before physical symptoms became obvious to the naked eye.

Sententia discusses the transition between different ethereal softwares for specific tasks, such as business events or psychic intuitions. He notes that the "packaging" method of communication is more accurate than traditional methods because it prevents the unconscious mind from filling in gaps with its own expectations. He emphasizes the importance of receiving surprising results as a personal confirmation that the work is not merely a placebo effect.

The discussion contrasts the Christian doctrine of "turning the other cheek" with the Taoist emphasis on situational judgment. Daniele Bolelli explains that while non-resistance is often appropriate, there are times when a forceful response is necessary. He emphasizes that there is no universal blueprint for behavior, and the correctness of a decision can only be judged by its eventual results.