Topic: Data Verification

Data Verification comes up in 3 chapters across 3 episodes of The Higherside Chats Free Show, from June 2015 to March 2019.

June 2015 March 2019

Related topics

Russell Targ & Lance Mungia | Third Eye Spies, Remote Viewing, SRI, & The CIA
• 44:47 - 47:37

Russell Targ & Lance Mungia | Third Eye Spies, Remote Viewing, SRI, & The CIA

Paradigm Shifts and Extraterrestrial Contact

The difficulty many people have in accepting remote viewing data is attributed to a mental filter that rejects information outside the current scientific paradigm. Lance Munguia suggests that humanity may be looking for extraterrestrial contact in the wrong places by focusing on radio waves instead of utilizing the non-local power of consciousness.

Courtney Brown | Remote Viewing Iapetus, Mars, Atlantis, & More
• 4:44 - 7:09

Courtney Brown | Remote Viewing Iapetus, Mars, Atlantis, & More

Multiple Universes Project, Double-Blind Remote Viewing Methodology

The Farsight Institute conducted a multiple universes project designed as an explicit test of parallel timelines using a rigorous double-blind protocol. Remote viewing sessions were completed and encrypted months before a "tasker" selected a target event that had not yet occurred at the time of the viewing. The results, which showed a perfect match between the viewers' descriptions and future news events, were published in a peer-reviewed journal and made available for public verification.

Greg Carlwood on SiriusXM’s The All Out Show
• 26:16 - 29:41

Greg Carlwood on SiriusXM’s The All Out Show

Roswell Incident Limitations, Lack of Verifiable Evidence

Courtney Brown explains why the Farsight Institute has not focused on the Roswell incident, citing a lack of verifiable physical evidence or unambiguous photographs. Unlike planetary anomalies captured by space probes, Roswell relies on hearsay and coerced witness testimony, which does not provide a sufficient "foothold" for a rigorous remote viewing project. Brown emphasizes that even if an event is likely true, it may not be a good candidate for their specific methodology without a physical comparison point.