Topic: Cycle Threshold

The reliability of RT-PCR testing is questioned, with Gedgaudas noting that running more than 17 cycles significantly increases the likelihood of false positives. She points out that major medical institutions often require 40 cycles, leading to an inflation of "cases" that are frequently asymptomatic. The discussion emphasizes that the term "case" is being used inappropriately in a medical context to drive a specific narrative.

The discussion turns to the limitations of the PCR test, citing its creator Kerry Mullis and his skepticism regarding its use in diagnosing infectious diseases. Brose recounts questioning the Houston Health Authority about high cycle thresholds leading to false positives and "case-demics." He also clarifies his stance on 5G, stating that while EMF is harmful over time, he does not believe it is the immediate cause of COVID-19 symptoms.

Crowe discusses Kary Mullis, the inventor of PCR, who was a skeptic of the HIV-AIDS theory. He explains that PCR is a manufacturing technique meant to amplify DNA, not a binary diagnostic tool for infection. He details how the "cycle threshold" (the number of times the sample is doubled) is an arbitrary cutoff that determines whether a person is labeled positive or negative.