Topic: Nist

Andrew Johnson explains the legal efforts made by Dr. Judy Wood and attorney Jerry Leaphart to bring physical evidence into the court system. He notes that John Hutchison submitted an affidavit to support Wood's claims, whereas the thermite researchers never submitted their findings to a judge. The discussion highlights the "Request for Correction" filed with NIST regarding their technical reports on the tower collapses.

Richard Gauge critiques the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) report on Building 7, labeling their fire-induced collapse theory a fabrication. He cites a $300,000 study by Professor Leroy Hulsey at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, which concluded that fire could not have caused the observed symmetrical collapse. The panel points to evidence of molten iron and sulfur—byproducts of thermate—found at the base of the ruins as proof of incendiary use.

The guests provide an update on ongoing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and litigation against agencies like NIST and the New Jersey State Police. They mention efforts to obtain records from the Shanksville crash site and photos of individuals arrested on 9-11. The segment concludes with a call for donations to LC4FOR911.org and AE911Truth.org to fund the continued legal and technical battle for a new investigation.

Dr. Wood identifies Applied Research Associates (ARA) and Science Application International Corporation (SAIC) as key contractors involved in the NIST report. She alleges that these organizations, which have expertise in directed energy weapons, created a hypothetical computer model rather than analyzing the actual collapse. The segment suggests these contractors were complicit in generating a fake scenario to explain the destruction.

Dr. Wood describes her 25-page Supreme Court filing, which argued that the destruction of the towers violated the laws of physics. She specifically points to the "tipping" of the top of Tower 2, noting that a rigid body should continue rotating according to the conservation of angular momentum. The fact that the rotation stopped as the top disintegrated into dust is presented as proof of a non-kinetic destructive mechanism.