The Ethical Skeptic Roger B. Cunningham | ECDO Theory, Pole Shifts Explained, & Earth’s Cataclysmic Cycle

00:00 Well, it's the end of the world as we know it but I feel fine. From The Sunshine State, I'm Greg Carlwood And one of the most enduring ideas in the alternative space is that our planet has long-standing routine cycles that leave humanity victim to widespread cataclysmic events Many cultures and regions have preserved some form of this knowledge from the Hindu Yuga cycle to numerous flood myths And we've seen a fair amount of evidence that intelligence agencies and elite bloodline families do put energy into studying these themes, from researchers who have admitted to doing consultations of their research for the privileged class... ...to the super-rich's recent preoccupation with fortified underground bunkers. And even the knowledge that they have classified certain texts that might reveal too much

00:47 It seems that they are happy to let the rest of us work tirelessly in ignorance until the next round of destruction, while secretly gaming out any and all ways to survive whatever it is that might happen. And the theories are numerous! Solar flares, plasma liquefaction events, widespread earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, meteor impacts, pole flips and widespread upheaval caused by the arrival of some planet X or just a few other theories floated But a new contender has entered the ring, and that's returning guest Roger Cunningham no longer anonymously going by The Ethical Skeptic. Over two decades he has developed what he calls the exothermic core-mantle decoupling Junibekhov Oscillation Theory or ECDO theory for short and lays it all out in methodical articles on his website theethicalskeptic.com as well as in his new book Inversion

01:33 It's a cataclysmic theory that proposes a physical mechanism linking flood myths, ancient monuments, geophysical anomalies and climate change. Suggesting that these are not isolated phenomena but expressions of a single underlying process within the Earth system." He's made a surprising number of predictions based on this mechanism, and time and time again it seems to check out. And wouldn't you know it? He has been called to present his work to high-level agencies and members of the royal family! But he doesn't forget the little guy either... Here to break it all down, the data driven deep diver and cataclysmic mechanism maestro, The Ethical Skeptic himself, Roger, welcome back

02:11 Hey greg it's a pleasure to be on the higher side chats good to see you again it's been three years and something three years since of change yes. Yes three years in a month and time does fly And i'm very happy to be a part of helping to get this out to more people you've gotten impressive amount of data and supporting evidence is pretty complex. Probably gonna have some visuals so if some listeners wanna jump over the youtube portion that link is right there in the show notes but will try to clarify what we can And I think going methodically through some of the articles is a good approach here, but how do you usually like to introduce this theory? Give them an overview of the mechanism before we get into the finer details. Yeah, the theory postulates that the mechanism comes from the core or the core decouples from the mantle and what is called anisotropy of the mantle

03:03 The imbalance it's not like a bowling ball it's like a like a if you will achieving bowling ball or loaded dice is weighted. off kilter by a certain degree. And it's that anisotropy that causes the Earth, once the core and mantle decouple, once the geomagnetic field of the Earth weakens below a certain level, the theory postulates that the outer rotational body which is the mantle, the crust in the asthenosphere rotate around into a natural gyroscopic optimal. That's offset by 104 degrees

03:40 from our geomagnetically locked optimal that we're in right now, or what the theory calls state one. State two is that gyroscopic optimal and probably once I relate that to you know, that core essence of the theory it links very elegantly to climate change because when the core goes through this cycle it becomes exothermic. It doesn't become hot because the heat, the overall heat in the system remains essentially the same. What happens is that potential energy that is bound in the lattice matrix of the core, the iron and the core, is released periodically it heats up the planet and then when we go back into the reverse cycle it becomes endothermic and begins to draw that heat or that potential energy back into it but it really elegantly links

04:34 All the ancient monuments, the cultural 175 cataclysm cultural traditions, the plurality of those. It really elegantly explains how the sky rolled from the southeast to the northwest in the Yungon legend out of China, it elegantly explains the inundation of Noah or Deucalion or Utnapishtim or Ziusudra or Atrahasis and we can go on and on and on in these cataclysms. But also explains or provides a very compelling and viable alternative explanation for climate change and why our abyssal oceans are heating so rapidly when that can't be mankind's activity because

05:19 The heating, if it was an overturning current the heating that's happening now in the abyssal oceans would have been generated during the time of Genghis Khan. So we really didn't have a lot of exceptional carbon generation activity at that time so it pieces together an elegant set of mechanisms and observations and then has made 36 predictions all of which have been satisfied positively this is very strong theory Yes so the terms that you usually use when talking about this as you said state one and state two as well as like the normal north pole in north pole prime, so these are to states were in the one right now. The arctic is at the top of the north then we look it where's the north star and has many uses for navigation a lot of

06:10 Megaliths are referencing it, pointing to it aligned to it. And then there's the state too where you say it goes from a geomagnetic configuration to a gyroscopic one and we'll talk about why It moves to this other position but that puts North Pole Prime when in State 2 In Africa and When you go back far enough, you find megalithic sites that are aligned as if this was the North Pole which is great supporting evidence. But as for the catalyst for this shift to stage 2, you say... Now the question might be how do you get at that configuration of state two

07:04 Why does the pole shift to africa not florida or ireland and this has to do with the large low shear velocity provinces is a term i had to look up but in simple terms. These are two continent-sized mysterious blobs of rock buried thousands of miles deep inside the Earth, right at the boundary where the planet's solid mantle meets its molten outer core. They sit opposite each other and they even have names! Tuzo is the one beneath Africa and Jason is located beneath the Pacific Ocean I had never heard of these 2 areas was never taught this which probably means they are important

07:40 But these are the factors that determine state too, right? It's like when the magnetic field weakens it kind of changes to this gyroscopic axis based on these two really dense points. Yes, that's correct. It's like let's say you have a refrigerator magnet holding you know uh a picture of your your comfortable comfy world on the refrigerator and that magnet weakens over time although in this case the earth's geomagnetic field weakens rather rapidly wanders rather rapidly most of this occurring since 1850 commensurate with our our climate heat introduction very very tightly Covariant and correlated not just correlated like carbon.

08:24 And so when that refrigerator magnet weakens, eventually the whole magnet and the picture will fall off the refrigerator. That's the same thing that the geomagnetic pole of the earth decouples from the rotational pole and those are two different things in navigation. The geo-rotational pole is zero zero zero degrees true when you navigate across the ocean or in an aircraft and the geomagnetic pole is offset depending on where you are around four to typically 11 degrees. And that's called variation in the old lingo and navigation, an American practical navigator is called variation. But suffice to say they're fairly close together when that refrigerator magnet is still firmly affixed to the refrigerator but when it weakens, the two let go of each other. The core lets go of the mantle in the crust

09:18 It decouples at the core-mantle boundary, or what is called the D' prime boundary. And that allows the outer rotational body of Earth to roll around into its normal gyroscopic octable circumstance. There's an axis conveniently that runs right through that African LLSVP and runs through the planet, and comes out on the South Pole conveniently right in the middle of the Pacific LLSVP. And these are lower density structures because the sound waves—that's why they're called low velocity provinces—the sound waves, the P-waves or S-waves that move through

09:58 move at a slower rate. So the sound has difficulty getting through less dense media, and if we take that anisotropy, we take that lighter moment there that runs from Africa through the Pacific and we create a gyroscope then we see exactly that the earth would rotate around 104 degrees. That was the genesis of this specific mechanics and geomechanics of the theory So we postulated this, we had not looked at even one monument. We went out and said if this is the case, if this 104 degree rotation is the case then we should see some older monuments that were maybe built during that time or at least were an honorarium to that time that pointed at that North Pole

10:46 And I expected, you know some nominal subset. It was astounding and there are really 238 monuments that fit this categorization in other words the builders had to commit their entire society to build these monuments it wasn't 20 guys and a case of beer and a lot of rocks it was truly a monument or a megalith or a monumental undertaking on the part of that society like Sacsayhuaman or the city of Gor and Iran, or the Xi'an pyramids in China. These are multi-generational projects that put a king's rule at risk! So those were 238 monuments that met that inclusion criteria we've worked through 134 of them and so far 111 of those are aligned precisely to NP Prime it just it knocked my socks off

11:39 Including the main shaft angles in the kufu pyramid as well yes that's a big one. Everyone knows their shafts and two major pyramids and the shafts are angled if the earth was in this state to they are angle to point at. This north pole prime which is just wild it's a good hit Yeah. And those all came afterwards, so it was a wonderful confirmation since then we've gone on with you know 30 some odd other confirmations which pertain to

12:15 the diatomaceous salt flats or the aridification of the Sahara, the Gobi Desert, the Great Victoria Desert, the Great Basin Desert, Patagonia. All of them rotate around what are called the Euler axes that are critical to the georotation that is involved in ECDO theory or postulated by ECDO theory. And so twelve years ago in episode ninety two of the show before i stop number nine stopped at a hundred but, i did an interview with ran from off on earth crust displacement theory. So this idea that the earth crust and mantle can actually shift around he is the analogy of appeal of an orange moving independently from the inside out say you know probably more like a peach where the pit is the core and it can move independently but you know piece of fruit or the inside

13:07 Is decoupled and can just move in spin around that's a good visual example but this idea i guess of this happening. Is not new you just got a more detailed model but there is kind of the history of people having a hunch that there might be some kind of. Earth crust displacement for lack of better term yet i contrasted first by saying that i've developed an actual theory and a theory involves a series of elegant mechanisms that, did exchange or act as a system off one another climate change through to the weakening core to the sloughing in the material into the mantle heating up the oceans

13:44 to the five mechanisms that perform coupling or decoupling at the core mantle boundary. So because of it, and because you can develop hypotheses off this set of mechanisms and you can make predictions off this set of mechanisms in those predictions show is true and not only true but elegant. In other words they all interconnect well and then human history also corroborates it. That's when a mere construct what I call a construct becomes a theory Or set of hypotheses so the difference main differences this is the first theory of this nature. The difficulty that like cap good had a bellicose key add in,

14:24 Chan Thomas had and all those who had variations on this crustal displacement theory was that they were doing empirical observations. They said, I've got a gut feel in fact Newton Sir Isaac Newton also had this feel when he looked at the Khufu pyramid in particular but they all had this gut feel that a georotation of some type would satisfy these empirical observations, the striations in the crusts, the deserts. The legends where the ocean came from, I think in the Epic of Gilgamesh it said that the oceans surmounted the citadel of Susa and came from the south. These are very informative things if we'd only use them

15:06 And so what these people did, they used their instinct but they couldn't create a true geophysical set of mechanisms. So they proposed decoupling at the crust. The problem is that if the crust decoupled, the entire planet would look like Kingman Arizona in the Grand Canyon. That would be ubiquitous and that's not the case. A crustal disruption that happens every, say 6400 years is going to leave an almost uninhabitable landscape for higher order life because of the crevices and the crags. The canyons, the sheer schisms that would occur from that. So this mechanism even though it fits some of the empire if you will or empirical description of the earth it wasn't sufficient in that it didn't explain why we don't see the disruption in the crust

15:56 You know for crustal displacement happened a million years ago well it have to be more than that is grand canyons fairly old it would have to be you know something that happened probably three hundred four hundred million years ago at the least. In order to quell all the crustal disruption that we would serve on the surface of the earth However, a core-mantle decoupling—an explanation that derives from the phase state change of hexagonal close packed material out of the core—the coupling of Earth's temperatures to the geomagnetic field which is far clearer and tighter than with carbon dioxide. All these things created something new so this is a novel theory. The only overlap with those with what I call or what patent

16:38 science calls prior art, the only overlap with them is basically instinct and semantics. But 95% of ECDO theory is a new novel theory for these reasons Yes and the level of detail is super impressive so i'm sure the next question people have as well how often does this happen in winter we do you mention six thousand four hundred years, hi having my notes five thousand two hundred years as something. I think maybe your saying that it's just not something that happens like clockwork you have to look for the signs that it might be that time which is a wandering

17:17 North pole magnetic north pole which has been going on since nineteen seventy three. And the warming of the oceans which warm from underneath because they're getting the heat from these vents inside the courts venting up and then we measure hotter ocean temperatures so there are some signs that we are, vaguely near however near you know i don't know a couple lifetimes away from maybe change but if im remembering correctly. This happens maybe every six thousand four hundred years it shifts to state two and then is only in state two for a couple hundred years and then shift back yes on the current theory or the current hypothesis that is that component of ECDO theory, and that's subject to modification without sacrificing the validity of ECDO theory necessarily. But right now we cite that state one takes up the majority of let's say—we carry in mind two different interval candidates here 5200 years and there are certain reasons for that

18:14 and then 6,443 years because that's a one-quarter division or you know one quarter portion of the great year or what is called the procession of the equinoxes which is 25,772 years. So those are our placeholder candidates ECDO theory accommodates whichever one is true but there's a second aspect to this in that those are placeholders So it doesn't mean that it occurs every single time. There may be times where this entire cycle lights off, but it never achieves what I call the LeChamps threshold. LeChamps was the geomagnetic excursion that occurred 42 thousand years ago and was our most recent pronounced geomagnetic excursion. It curiously involved

19:05 the geomagnetic pole wandering from about its current location, or its location in 1973 in northern Canada, wandering down to below the southern tip of Africa and dwelling there for 400 years. Independently we estimated based on the erosion of the Tura limestone casing stones off the Khafre pyramid a period of about 400 years for the ocean water to do what's called carbonic acid dissolution of Tura limestone. Tura is a very profuse and more dissolvable limestone than other forms of limestone, so those two four hundred year estimates match up fairly well in addition there was an artifact found and dated to 3800 BCE called the Nubian egg

19:56 and the Nubian egg depicts flooded Egyptian basin lands, the Fayyum Basin as well as the three pyramids without their casing stones in 3800 BCE. It's clear on the inscription but importantly on top of that egg was inscribed a two-cycle calendar with the outside band of the cycle calendar representing 4800 years and the inner band of that cycle representing 400 years. And so that's a postulate, the subset of you know the theory is not...the theory doesn't necessarily found itself upon that information but I thought it highly compelling that egg was in a pharaohs, minor Pharaohs tomb out of Ethiopia but was considered such importance that it was regarded equal to statues of gods and repositories of gold and it was just an ostrich egg

20:51 So, these things suggest inductively that state two may be a 400-year cycle but it's up in the air as to what the overall macrocycle is. Is it 6400 years? Is it 5200 years? Either one of those provides for three ECDO rotation sets inside the Holocene and Anthropocene period –the time when man has really had his intelligent presence represented on the planet. That matches the Egyptian priests' testimony to Solon, where they said you Greeks have a short memory there have actually been three cataclysms not just the Cataclysm of Deucalion which is the one they celebrated in their mythology

21:35 Or cultural traditions i'm learning to avoid the word mythology and this is not you know i heard some other hosts like take issue with your use of math but meth. I have no problem with myth myth does not mean fake myth means like legend or echo of a story that's correct i think you can see this but i pulled up, the picture the pyramid because. So when this happens my understanding is that the crust moves but the water's independent so you know if you take a glass of water and slide it across the table or slide beer down the bar top, you know the liquid sloshes around. So the liquids not connected to anything

22:12 So this happens and water just goes everywhere. And you think that when you look at the pyramid, there's no better explanation? There's nothing that fits more than this is the water from the last shift sloshing up against it and it shows us how high up The water was yes That's called a title band up at the top on this is coffree and I use the word coffee Khafre, just for simplicity. Khafren did not build this pyramid. Khufu did not build the Khufu Pyramid. These are not tombs those are childish fairy tales they're so ludicrous that I mean most people were laughing about that now but what you see up at the top there you see it's a very top what is called the pyramidion which is incorrectly called the pyramidian and that was something on the top of

22:59 Khufu, this is actually the intact Tura limestone and you can see casing stones. You can see the weathering, the normal weathering that's up there it's looking rough hewn and has some pocking but by enlarge the 90 degree angles of those surfaces are preserved at the very top that's called weathering type erosion Right below it we have what is called tidal banding. And what happens there is that can only occur when the ocean stays at a given level, sea level for a period of time. In other words the ocean rises up into high tide and low tide but expanding beyond that we have the ocean rising up and creating waves from sea state 1 to 8 typically rarely gets into sea state 9 or 10

23:47 And I always tell my podcast, i've been officer of the deck on a ship in sea state eight because that was the only one who wasn't throwing up. The entire uh the ship drivers or the officers of the deck if you will and so I had to stand the watch in a hurricane that was sea state eight and it was absolutely terrifying if you go out on the bridge when you have to lash yourself to the Handrail on the bridge wing if you need to take an observation for whatever reason, you want to do that. And they have these big watertight doors I walked out on the bridge wing lashed to the hand rail and the wave I was at 46 feet high. That was my eye height on the ship. And the sea state eight waves were 20 to 40 feet above my head. They were much larger than the ship itself. It was terrifying but

24:36 You can see that the tidal banding on that Khafre pyramid has what is called Cleopatis parabolic uprising on those 90 degree angles. And I don't put 90-degree angles in ports anymore because they erode very quickly because of this waving effect, So that tidal band is clearly generated by the kinetic action of the surface effects of the ocean. Below that, however you saw a bunch of other dark material that we called detritus. That's the dissolved... those are the heavier remnants of the dissolved Tura limestone casing stones. I always joke that if they scavenge these stones for use in Cairo what'd they do? Crush up the stones and take only the heavy components of it

25:21 And, and you know the, the imam said go sprinkle all the heavy components back on the courses of the pyramid. That would have been at that. I mean that's what they would've had to done here. You can see the detritus in the detritus, the heavier components that dissolved parabolically slid to the bottom and you could see it in that concretion at the bottom. That's not sand, that is actually travertine concrete! It was very difficult to remove. Sand does not cause travertine concrete. Reconstituted limestone however does. And curiously one face of this pyramid would involve 75,000 metric tons of tura limestones in their solid form as they were formed in the Eocene. But when they're dissolved by the carbonic acid dissolution effect of ocean water, the heavier components fall down and the mass of that detritus—that parabolic slide that slid down like goo on a wall to the foot of the pyramid is 55,000 tons! So

26:21 Where did they get this 55,000 tons of travertine? There's nowhere it could have come from. Did it blow in? It couldn't blow in its limestone! It's not sand the only place that this 55,000 tons of travertine could have come from was the face of the pyramid itself. So to me, that is quad erat demonstrandum deductively there's only one solution to what we see here in this patterning on Khafre and that is a sustained I believe it's goodness 576 foot higher elevation than that local sea level at Giza.

27:02 Me you make a strong case it this doesn't really tell us anything i guess about the purpose of the pyramids but is kinda curious that they seem to have built. The structure where just the top folks right out almost like, i mean it coincidentally like the water levels seventy five percent of the way up but you could still see if your on the surface of your right on a boat It's weird but this has nothing to do with the purpose of the pyramids i'm right well I think if you look at it here the yeah i was amazed when first you know is pondering this idea that good fortune we had that the state two ocean.

27:38 Sea level at Giza just happened to intersect with the vertical rise of the Khafre pyramid. I was like, wow! We are so fortunate that happened but if this is a cyclical thing... If we precisely go to North Pole as we see it now, we precisely go back to that 104 degree offset state too then this pyramid may have been set there as an indicator, as a litmus flag saying pay attention. The water comes up to this level consistently and we're going to give it a little bit of error banding because of the chaos in the viscosity of the mantle and its oblation

28:17 you know, it's not going to arrive exactly at the same foot level that it would. But we're going to put a pyramid here with soft casing stones so that you, the generations who follow can figure this out. Unfortunately, we've got 12 billion people that have looked at this pyramid and nobody has figured it out and I contend now, I think we have the beginnings of that understanding." I love it and that is something i had another guest analog who he propose this idea to that. The pyramids were there so that like you don't see the speak yeah marker basically i need to see the capstone, i've always thought whatever the purpose of the great pyramid is that has a kind of jive with the other many many pyramids around the world

29:05 Like, why did all these cultures totally separate not communicating build these very similar structures? I would imagine even if the Egyptian ones are the most advanced that there's a similar logic to building out all the ones that were built. Well if it required... If it required a leader, king, pharaoh or monarch of antiquity to risk his entire family's legacy, to risk the longevity an existence of his nation to build this monument that took decades, arguably maybe a century or more to build. Then it's an important message! It's not a burial tomb and you know that's another ridiculous notion

29:46 If it's that important to build, I want to pay attention to the message that is entailed in that megalith, that construction. And it took a while but yes we were able to drive the message and the message was hey! The North Pole was here! Hey! The water level at this location rose to here! Pay attention humanity you can derive the answer from this and it took us...you know..we're fairly obtuse It took us millennia to at least even come close to trying figuring this out. Yes, and I was going to share this other picture i have of gobekli tepe that you also include

30:26 So there's been so much speculation about this in particular and you know that i like about this theory is the six thousand years like to me that makes sense. For a story or echoes of a story to be maintained to some degree, you hear these people making these theories like that this happened a million years ago it's like well i don't know we have a lot of cultural references and like theirs like whispers and echos of this happening It just seems like that time depth doesn't make sense, but 6,000 years I think is pretty reasonable. We largely have forgotten it but as you say there's over 100 cataclysmic cultures, there's a lot of indigenous cosmologies that do still contain the story we have a few monuments and structures that also point to it But talk to us about this here about the pillar and how you think this folds into the overall theory

31:21 Well, science says that the pillar was constructed contemporaneously with the human activity that's in the soil embedded in the soil around it. The small stones are stacked up carbon residues occur from fires that they use for their working energy medium if you will and so they'll carbon date the suit if you will any kind of carbon bearing element that exists in the mortar or in the soil around the pillar but they can't date the pillar itself. So, they don't know whether or not the pillar is reused from an older structure whether it was held at a museum for thousands of years and then deployed back into go back to do a back late happy in ninety six hundred bc e so there unable to date the pillar however I believe that I've cracked the dating code of the pillar

32:13 We've made the mistake of assuming that this scorpion was equivalent to the constellation Scorpius, and it is not. We've made the correct conjecture in some instances that what I call The Condor—and I do that for a reason—equates to The Swan Cygnus. That is indeed the case! But what the prior analysts have missed —and this is the change I made and the key to solving the entire pillar is that if you take a look at that dot and look at what's above it, what is marked above it are the two separate bands of aurora borealis. The upper band above those squares is the red or oxygen, I believe its oxygen 4 but it's an isotopic state of oxygen that emits that frequency of red that looks like tomato soup color

33:03 in a strong, rather robust Aurora Borealis. Below that you see the green banding represented and that green banding is what most people see when they see an aurora. And we've had the auroras going down into Turkey and Texas and Florida, most recently some exceptional Auroras as of late I contend that those squares on the top are actually what are called Aubrey segments in in moon circles. Moon circles were used somehow, and we haven't solved this yet, moon circles were used somehow to track this cycle but we haven't solved that. And key inside these moon circles where 56 increments inside the complete 360 degree circle and they were called Aubrey segments if we postulate that those squares inside the Aurora Borealis are Aubrey segments then

33:55 then what it depicts is five Aubrey segments either side of true north, and the center square there is true north. So that is looking northward and if you use that as the sound basis for conjecture you can then say that fried egg-looking dot above the condor's wing or Cygnus' wing is not the sun as everyone has conjectured, it is the celestial North Pole which is what the ancients used as their master calendar. They didn't use the Sun as a calendar they used the Moon and they used the procession of the equinoxes so if we take a look I brought to this equation the basis of apostille that says that has to be the celestial North Pole its one of the easiest things to observe in the sky

34:43 Then, if I take and start assigning stars like the beak on Cygnus and the wing on Cygnus. Those are very obvious matches so i start there and I matched 165 stars that are all principally visible to the naked eye Once you match, say 20 stars, it looks encouraging but it's not proof. But once you match all signature 165 stars in those asterisms, You end up with a P-value that's in the millions and remoteness and likelihood. So to me that was an exact match when I hit all 165 stars in that constellation set And they matched those asterisms on the pillar

35:24 Then I had a match. There's no doubt about it in my mind again quad rat demonstrandum It's a deductive arrival there is only only one answer that's available as not inducted, but the problem was this If that indeed stood is valid, and if indeed then it proves out that this scrambled egg looking circle above the condor's wing was the celestial North Pole. Then that means that this pillar is dated to 14800 BCE which just happens to match the 6443 year interval of dividing the Great Year or the procession of equinoxes by four in other words we have an inundation

36:06 We have an inundation associated with the Hyalina Pali geomagnetic excursion. We have another inundation, 6400 years commensurate with the Gothenburg geomagnetic excursion. Then we have another displacement which occurs at the time of Noah and all of a sudden a loss of 95% of humanity on the face of the planet in a human script gap. And then 6400 years after that, we end up about 2030 But it's not strong enough for a prognostication. It's good sound evidence, but it's all inductive in this case so I can't say that 2030 or 2040 we're going to have another georotation. I don't think that that's necessarily strong enough basis to say that. What encourages is that we need to understand this theory

36:57 And the reason we haven't observed these things is because we have not had this theory as the backdrop for our research. In research, you find what you go out to look for that's a hard principle in science and if word only looking for the uniformitarian model like it's a religion just the religion that replaced the Bible then all we're going to find is the uniformitarian model and so we're introducing what is called Occam's razor plurality there is now an additional idea that needs to be researched legitimately yes you're not trying to alarm people are not trying to make this predictive but, you are saying that a lot of the precursor signs are happening in our lifetime.

37:41 The whole started moving in nineteen seventy three and it's gone past greenland is in russia now the magnetic field is weakening. Do you get any indication of how we can needs to get before this occurs and how close to that level of weakness are we my feel right now there's not just feeling its you know some objectivity to it, is that I used the LeChamps excursion 42,000 years ago as my reference standard. Assuming that was more than likely a very pronounced possible ECDO rotation as well because of that 400 year dwell time at the state two location for the geomagnetic North Pole. That's pretty good match. I use that LeChamps continuum as a one to 10 scale

38:29 and conjecture that the geomagnetic pole is got to exceed somewhere from four to six on that scale in both its weakening the reduction in his permeability words the magnet strength of the north pole geomagnetic or poll gets weaker and weaker indeed that's been happening since eighteen fifty. And that in addition, it wanders and wanders very rapidly. It wandered what was it? 10.6 kilometers in the last month everyone says oh the geomagnetic shift happens over thousands of years no it doesn't We see the traces which span thousands of years, but the actual progression of the pole itself—which may not show in the remnant isotopes in the mid-Atlantic ridge until later—that evolves very rapidly as we've noticed. The pole has moved from Canada to Russia since 1973! It's not an airline flight but it's dang fast! So the idea that this takes a long time is not met by the evidence and supported by the evidence

39:32 I think that on that scale if we call it the last one to ten were probably about a three through that with the danger zone being. six and above, if you will. So we may be 50% through it now what I call these factors that we observe leading into the, to this one-to-six Leschamp scale range maybe were at a three, maybe we're at two even arguably they're called indigo factors that's a term akin to the butterfly effect is early influences can cause major whipsaw Results later on inside a system but they don't cause it immediately there not an inflection point or tipping point that comes later these early inflections. Actually i call indigo points that used in market strategy is to observe how markets of all

40:21 So that a client, like one of my clients was Under Armour for a decade and half. You use those pre-inflection points to determine when you strike the market with a product? When you launch a campaign? When do you go head to head with your logo promotion against Nike? You don't just do that willy nilly! You watch the indigo indicators and wait until you see the right time then begin what is called TAH. The tall indicators means the military is moving, D-Day is happening. Guns are firing and troops are moving. The tip end point has begun in terms of earth geophysics the top point I'm thinking somewhere north of six on the Lachamp scale

41:04 So, the reason I separated those terms is that people would know these are all indigo indicators. It doesn't mean that the pole shift is about to happen nor does it actually validate that the pole shift will indeed happen. Some of these may not they may misfire every so often or maybe even the majority of these cycles it may misfire and not happen at all. That's why for that discipline, that indigo to tall progression across the Lachamp scale. I wanted to use that so people didn't get terrified or go through the ontological shock of having to hash this out without that framing.

41:44 Yeah i mean it's still concerning that some of these indicators are in play but we just don't know how for how long they're in play before something happens and then I guess the shift, the actual physical shift happens within days have heard you say maybe up to a week where does that come from that. You know the physical shifting to state two like how could we ever know that doesn't take a year or that we can actually say seven days With any kind of confidence well i ordered the one hundred and seventy five global. What are called flood myths and flood is a misnomer these are not floods that's all hold different mechanism user inundations and most of them call them cataclysms or inundations with the oceans cascade over land so the cultural traditions are minutes actually give us the answer if we pay attention, so i went to the through the one hundred seventy five for the majority of the one hundred and seventy five

42:40 cultural traditions on the inundation, the plurality of them—the majority didn't say a duration but the plurality of them somewhere on the order of 12-15%—cited seven to nine days. In particular we use the example of the Epic of Gilgamesh cited seven days that the oceans rithing like a woman in labor. The legend of Deucalion, the cultural tradition of Greek Deucalion lasted nine days And that seven to nine days repeated throughout that literature, if you will as a plurality of it. The only thing that cited 40 days for the flood or 348 days I believe for the full duration of the destructive period was the Bible and not sure where it gets that other than 40 being a mystical number and it's really trying to convince a population that something is true rather than trying to document

43:37 actual history. So, I have to set the Bible aside as many of its items are standalone but so we went ahead and modeled this based on particular the testimony of Utnapishtim in the Epic of Gilgamesh he cites that the rotation occurred the land shattered like a clay pot and then rotated over the period about 24-36 hours maximum and then the oceans sashed They rolled around like, you know when you get in a bathtub real quick the water's going to roll around and slosh for a period of time or a pool after an earthquake. It keeps rocking well after the earthquake is gone same thing with the oceans. Utnapishtim cited that whole process took seven days but the majority of it occurred on the first day and it describes the sequence, the tephra lapilli, the tephra bombs that came down and what he did in response to those events

44:32 And so that was fairly compelling, and that's what we used to do what is called an empirical modeling of the rotation. But then we went in and expanded that to say okay, what type of rotation would cause the Great Victoria Desert? What type of rotation would cause the progression that ended up being the Gobi desert in those saline flats and diatomaceous flats What would have caused the penetration of those oceanic deltas all the way to Salt Lake City and through the Devil's Pass in the Great Basin Desert in the Western U.S.? What would cause the oceans to rise to the higher elevations of Patagonia? And that curiously matched that same 12-36 hour rotation that is described in our cultural legends,

45:21 Wild. So while we're still in this first hour, I wanted to make sure we try and get the majority of the visual references in. I was going to pull up your interactive map but maybe it's better if you do it. There is one that I've seen where actually includes the monuments and you can kind of show how they point and that I think is pretty useful Now this a concept simulation there are three types of simulations. There is concept simulation There is empirical simulation and there's theoretical simulation. There are various teams working on all three of those, so what we're doing here is a concept simulation that's really teaching the basics. What's an Euler axis? What does the WEA mean?

46:05 when the rotation occurs. Does that rotate around or is it sits still? Is it the eye of a hurricane, or is it you know the feeder bands, the violent portion of the hurricane? It's teaching the basics of ECDO so this concept simulator we also have significant work underway on empirical simulators that explain the origin of the deserts, that explain the preservation of genetic diversity at both Euler axis points that explain the striations through the crust of the earth, all of which rotate around the Euler axes. These are describing the empire and you learn this in school that when you describe the empire not developing a theoretical model. You're just simply saying hey here's a photograph of how things look right now give me a theory which would drive all these features that's describing the empire or empirical modeling and then finally theoretical modeling is

47:02 All right, let me take the specific anisotropy of the LLSVPs. Let me take the mass of the mantle to mass at the core and strength of five coupling factors that are deep prime-prime layer. That's theoretical modeling that is underway as well a lot of energized groups working on this but as we look at this we see the basics for CD or ECDO you can see that's the earth rotating as it does now its called diurnal rotation its just what creates our day and night And then we have the loss of the geomagnetic field along that LeChamp scale. such that the point where the decoupling occurs at the core mantle boundary and I mentioned, the five factors that couple the core to the mantle. Those five factors go away under this theory and they explains the mechanisms why it explains why the core mantle boundary is the only viable point which this decoupling can occur in a course of the first three to postulate that goes into what is called

48:02 the ECDO Zhanna Bekov rotation, and we'll go ahead and see it here. This is from state one to state two, and it rotates around very quickly in terms of a set of days 12 hours in some models 36 hours in other models both of which or that entire continuum of which explain these desert formations like the enormous destruction in Patagonia the washways of oceanic inundation that occur in the Andes very high up or at very higher elevations, the Mauritanian slide. The particular striations that occur through the Sahara Desert, Kusi Pass and the Mauritanian striations that move right past the Reshot structure, the Great Basin desert all fit this rotation very well so this is state two and you can see in state 2

48:57 the Earth is rotating around a new North Pole. And this is the principle of what is called the georotational pole or true north, it also points to Polaris right now in our sky, that everything rotates around that spot. This is why the ancestors revered that spot in the sky, this projectus, this orange cylinder here at NP prime up into the sky and that's the celestial North Pole Our ancestors revered that because they could spot it easily at night. It tells you your latitude when you're a navigator, so it's an important and very observable component of the sky! Some Iconjecture considered it the seat of God – where God lived because it is the unmovable mover in all celestial mechanics. So therefore, that must be where God lives, and everything revolves around him or her as the case may be in antiquity.

49:53 And so I could see why the ancients would revere that way. Most people are like, well they wouldn't have even seen this North Pole. Beg to differ! They would have centered much of their cosmology on the position of this North Pole but here's what we conjectured from geomechanics And the rotation occurred along what is called the Zhenebakov 31st East Meridian of Longitude. That's where the rotation occurred, it rotated 104 degrees from the North Pole to NP prime. Curiously, the geographic center of the world is right at the center of that rotation and not coincidentally because its hinting to us this... The Earth is lopsided and by the way that creates our land masses and by the way that just happens

50:40 part of the anisotropy of the Earth and that's what the meridian rotation is going to be. It's gonna go right through the geographic center of the Earth, but also curiously it runs right through the Giza pyramids as well so we made the conjecture here that all right let's say this state 2 were in state two here and we can see it happening here diurnal rotation now somewhere else its not along that blue line which is our current equator It's on along a new equator, which is you know you can see it around the rim of the earth here and that's its diurnal geo rotation to the earth. This is just normal variation of events there was no external energy required to do this there was just simply removal

51:26 of an asymmetric state inside the earth. So, the theory conjectured all right if this is indeed the case then those big significant comital ancient monuments should all point at this North Pole just as our roads do today you go to Washington DC and all the roads in buildings are oriented toward current North Pole Curiously, they're also oriented to NP prime. Most people don't know that so at that location in Washington DC, NP prime is it 90 degrees east and the North current north pole is at 00 degrees north very curious arrangement there

52:04 almost as that's it. So if we place in the monument set, and these are the 111 monuments we've surveyed thus far, and we have to survey them because we cannot take the database that people use for their azimuthal alignments what I found in probably 10-20% of these monument cases is either the azimuth was not indicated in the database at all Or the surveying scientists said, it's pretty close to the local winter solstice. So let's just call it the winter solstice. An example is the Newgrange monument in Ireland. It's eight alignment of the passage and that's a clear single alignment. It's not a quadrant alignment or ordinal alignment. It's one alignment corridor points right at NP prime precisely

52:55 Eight degrees north of that is the winter solstice of the sun. 8 degrees was close enough, so they declared the alignment of the passage to be commensurate with the winter solstice and put that in the database! So I can't rely on the data because they went looking for what they already understood to be true. That's not what i'm doing. I'm actually going to look and see what is actually true in each monument you measure the zion pyramids...they're not pointing west That's not what they're doing. They all point exactly at NP prime and there are dozens of them throughout China, so if we take those monuments 111 monuments and know that we use the actual satellite imagery to align those monuments and use the older portions of the monuments not recent constructions in line to recent construction like they tried to do it Sacsayhuaman on the ancient most ancient walls, Those big gigantic impossible boulders all aligned to NP Prime So

53:52 So if we take that set of inclusion and constraint criteria, and we plot it out in what is called under ECDO theory obsequience. That means simply means these monuments point at a common point they venerate that point just like the ancients venerated NP prime as the seat of the God if you will. If we draw those lines out this is what we end up with we end up with a clear deductive intersection at NP prime 104 degrees just as the LLSVP centroids would dictate, just as the three-moment body problem would dictate inside this Janabekhov rotation theory. One key point to stress here is that this is not caused by the Janabekhov effect

54:38 the Janabakhov effect, which is that spinning wing nut in space that everybody's familiar with on YouTube. The wing nuts spins one direction then flips over and spins the other direction. That is not the cause of this rotation it's simply the path of least resistance and that's why the rotation generally adhered to this 31st meridian there's probably some more a lot more chaos than that but for right now the theory has got described the overriding principle or the macro principle So we see confirmation from these monuments that indeed NP Prime, that location projected into the sky was venerated by these very ancient cultures in their monuments and they put an enormous effort into it just like the Giza pyramids. This was not for burial of a ruler this was not a vanity display look how powerful and talented we are don't attack us if we can build this mound of stones will surely defeat you! It wasn't that type of hubris or vanity

55:38 It was an abject terror that mankind might not survive the next cycle. That's what was important enough to build a 2.5 million stone, two point two tonne stone edifice at Khufu! It was that important and that's the only thing that was that important. That's why Sir Isaac Newton he instinctively grasped that the pyramid—and he put this in his notes—that the Khufu Pyramid was intimately wound up inside the destructive cataclysm cycles of the earth but he could not put his finger on exactly why i contend that this continues sir isaac newton's work. Well think that super impressive anyone can go on your website and mess with this, and put in you know do the check boxes and take whatever data they want what you got a really great piece of software here that makes it clear

56:36 I'm curious about the weather so what is in that north all prime spot today what country is that and that is zambia. There's two there are several z nations or sometimes i say zimbabwe or zambezi but it's zambia believe as the nation is a thin strip in the central part of zambia I'm curious is there anything there that you know highlights it as important is their a monument there are we thinking that when this configuration was in state to. That was all under ice like does the parts of the planet better hot and cold shift in accordance with rotation,

57:24 Yes, it does. We do get a cold region above SP prime which is the South Pole in the Pacific and a cold region above NP prime but it's not as pronounced during that chaotic 400 years, the polarity and this where we derive the word polarity, the differentiation between equatorial latitudinal and temperate latitudinal the tropics, those regions. The difference between that and the polar regions is less pronounced in state two. State one we've been in it long enough to where that differentiation begins to show most effectively and we get our polarized caps you know both Antarctica and Arctic. In the state 2 it is not as polarized so we don't end up with a massing of ice at NP prime that we have currently say in Antarctica

58:14 One of the key questions that is brought up is, well we have ice cores that show clearly 800 000 years of continuity in Antarctica. But if they look into it there are only two ice cores that show that. The rest of the ice cores, the vast majority do not show eight hundred thousand years they show an absence of eight hundred thousand years and the absence of ice is far more informative than the presence If ice melts away, you don't have a record of that. And you can say well what we do is we compare the North and the South Pole and if they match up and there are carbon layers in there based on climatological conditions at the time and if they match up then they roughly agree well that would be true except Antarctica and Arctica are both on the equator so their going to look exactly alike even if an ECDO state two happened

59:07 In the melt-off, all the evidence washes away and then you begin accumulating ice again. You have no idea that a melt off occurred! It is not exclusionary evidence but the final thing is this those two cores that we cite as the 800 000 year continuity were taken at Dome C and Dome F in Antarctica which are at 12 and 13,000 meters of elevation. If we took an ice core sample at Mount Fuji today, we're going to say it never existed at the equator because it has a continuity of ice! But it is a tropical latitudes so what we did is we again. When out looking for the answer we had already formulated with rolled ice cores based on that uniformitarian answer and then walked away instead our job has done the purpose of establishing plurality under ecd theories so that we begin to research

1:00:00 a competing alternative, a compelling alternative and not have people mock it with tinfoil hats and conspiracy theories. But actually understand this is a legitimate scientific theory. It deserves research. It is not proven in its finality and it's not going to be 100% correct but it has now surpassed Occam's razor and merits serious scientific inquiry Yeah it makes me think about a lot of stuff you got to present this is the real deal then you gotta put everything in context but. Even though people doubt the out of africa theory there's a lot of,

1:00:36 Curiosities about is that really the proper way to think about human migration but. I mean it's interesting that it kinda conforms with this model little bit what do you think about human migrations what we know about them i mean what we can know i guess, there still like i say there's a lot of people doubting the mainstream dot in the mainstream popular around here but i don't know how you feel about the out africa theory some people have a Out of the north theory like a lot of people who go that direction but how does this work with human migrations in the day we know and when these state changes will happen well. Two things i guess number one out of africa theories based on the progression of mitochondrial dna and if you read brian sykes, seven daughters of eve you understand the seven

1:01:23 speciations of mitochondrial DNA, which is what is passed from the mother to the child from the mother to the child from mother to the child. That certainly has an apparent origin out of Africa if you look at the ECDO concept here You have species preservation in the Amazon which is certainly appropriate that's the most species diverse area on the planet and again you also have and that matches the Euler axis You also have in terms of macro species, larger animals at diversity. The east oiler axis preserves those species so we have a good match here at the Wallace what is called the Wallace line and Sulawesi. And is that because those two areas are least disturbed? Yes they are the eye of the hurricane and the rotation and you can see it here interesting to watch this

1:02:13 There you go so the biodiversity of the amazon stays intact as well as this other area because it's not getting radically up and exactly head so we go with. We look at that amazon basin pause rotation this is why this is so useful its again not empirical simulator it's not a theoretical simulator but it teaches the state teaches the basic concepts of ECDO theory. So again, we have the rotation here that's why the Amazon has so species diverse it's at the eye of the hurricane it doesn't get the disruption

1:02:49 So we go back and reset the view, and we take a look at Africa here. And Africa has what the theory postulates is called the Saharan shield. In other words when the rotation occurs it goes up like this so the oceans go in the opposite direction by Newton's second law I believe it was or first law. This ocean cascades through here creates the Kusi Pass right here these salt flats diatomaceous salt flats inside Chad and then turns by Coriolis and inertial effects, flows right off and creates the Mauritanian slide. The largest underwater slide on the planet is right here where these waters ran off of the continent. This is called the Saharan Shield. It provides a habitat of diversity here in the Congo Basin which is extraordinary

1:03:42 And for that reason, I think that the out of Africa theory is supported by ECDO theory necessarily. But there's a second factor here Substantial portions of the planet man occupied in state two are now underwater. We can't detect those civilizations, those people, those genetic footprints, those ancestral footprints a band we can't detect those so we're left with serious holes in that continuity that history but one thing that's important to look at here is a thing called the Cuban underwater formation And it was, I figured that's where you had good insight or good prescience on that. The Cuban underwater formation is right here. Paula Zalitsky who's an oceanographer and her husband which who is a, an engineer who does specializes in this type of work they mapped the entire complex. It was clear there were buildings roads pyramids structures monuments. And they mapped it and they hadn't paid published at alignment

1:04:40 Yes what is the lines to there's that of sequence line for prime it runs right through and be primed the problem is. that this is, I believe 1400 feet underwater right now. So during state two it arguably would have been and in fact the empirical modelers are citing that's indeed the case that this western tip of Cuba, this land bridge right here between the Yucatan and Cuba was actually dry land during state 2 so this monument would have been above the ocean during state 2 for its alignment

1:05:20 to NP prime. So it matches well the results of many of the empirical models thus far, similarly you know you look at the choice of location here by the entities that built and I'm using that word for a reason these monuments in particular The most ancient of these monuments involve technologies that we don't currently hold. The large stones at Sacsayhuaman, they're not poured, they're actually plastically deformed so some type of energy was used to deform those stones for in-situ placement. They were not poured there are no disciplines of pouring in those stones at all this is curiously close to the western Euler axis

1:06:03 and a survival point. In other words, the choice of this mountain range right here these 7000 foot in higher elevations that are habitated on purpose but aren't really optimal places to live in any other normal context would be to live more down in the Amazon basin where the food is these actually I believe were selected on purpose because they were survival points for under a knowledge Paradigm about this regular cyclic inundation right on so for people who are just listening when you take this. This graphic this model and you move it from state one to stay tuned new factor and where the oceans would slosh too i mean its these huge swathes of basically every continent where, it's kind of desert or it's not as lush is other parts and

1:06:59 That's because it would be, it would have so much ocean water that just kind of. makes diatomaceous earth and makes it not so fertile because of all the salt. Makes deserts, I guess you would say? You can see the rotation here. The Pacific cascades through becomes the Gobi Desert. The Indian Ocean cascades across the majority of Australia creates the striations and the elevated salt striations and diatomaceous striations that can't form because there's no tributaries feeding them. So how do you get all that mass of oceanic deposition at a high elevation inside a little crevasse.

1:07:37 Without any tributaries feeding it, it has to have come from the ocean. So you see the rotation occurs roughly around this eastern Euler axis so what you described is indeed correct. I'm hearing some people talk about all this El Nino stuff being relevant do find it to be connected? Yes absolutely El Nino is where we measure a patch of ocean sea surface temperature about from here its in the eastern Pacific right along the equator and basically it's called a mass formation. It is not necessarily current but heat signature appears, derives right off the west coast of South America and then conforms to the equator runs in points West and we measure the temperature what is called Nino 3.4

1:08:27 currently and the pronounced elevation in that temperature is our gauge for what the weather on the planet is going to be like. And, the conventional explanation as well this originates from a mass formation that's result of overturning currents and compression waves that force the heat to the surface it was always there just existed because mankind has been burning fossil fuels for 150 years and now the oceans are slapping back at our face our own heat it's given it back to us. ECDO theory says that is absolute baloney, a circular argument. Philosophically, it's a principi petitio but in terms of systemic logic

1:09:09 It's basically taking the answer, drawing a connector around to the input and saying use this answer as the input. It's circular calculations as well as logic it is not the cause of this heat what we see in the 2023 ENSO was a record amount of heat or rove in three weeks just three weeks. It couldn't have come from the sun. We would've all fried. It couldn't have come from the atmosphere heating up. We would've all baked I mean, not everybody, but we would have had big problems and we didn't. There's only one other place this three week dramatic introduction of heat planet wide is not just ENSO or El Nino that's our escape hatch or ad hoc rescue if you will to explain why the planet is heating so fast it heated in three weeks in 2023 the same thing happened again in 2026 were ENSO 3.4

1:10:04 the entire planet heated, not just this little band of Pacific here they call ENSO 3.4, the entire planet oceans heated up and what's key in this is that we observe over the last 15 to 25 years that the abyssal, the very bottom of the ocean is indeed the fastest heating component of those oceanic measures so therefore because of this deductive elimination of the sun and the atmosphere wholly insufficient, 1000 to 1 insufficient or more than that. Actually 30,000 to one when you look at the suddenness of the arrival. 30,000 to one, the sun and the atmosphere are insufficient to explain the heat signature arrivals of 2023 and 2026. The only location that could have originated is also what is heating the abyssal oceans, the very bottom segment of the ocean, and that is geothermal heat

1:13:29 I would say many remaining unknowns in the equation as the earth's cycles and upheavals but he does make an excellent case. We didn't really talk about this today but i heard he spoke at ben davidson's event you know this suspicious observers event, and then is another often requested gas but it hasn't taken me out on my offers to return The point being is that Ben is focused on the sun and Roger's focused on the inner earth, but they consider the work compatible because as Roger has said, the sun is involved with the Earth's magnetic field. As part of a circuit so to speak, you can see factors from either vantage point that are going to be involved all along different parts of the circuit again

1:14:21 If you can connect something like this to other high-level work, I think that only makes it sound better. And part of me wants to know about this stuff and another part of me doesn't really want to spend too much time away from the enjoyment of life on things at this scale that i can't control or plan for What are you gonna do i think roger has stacked up so much data and really made this hypothesis reasonable by taking the model and making predictions that if this models true we should be able to see x y & z and then time and time again i think he said thirty six times so far, the results have checked out and theory seems to support the evidence.

1:15:09 We barely really got into this in the first hour but the ancient monuments and megalithic sites aligned to NP Prime is such an amazing hit. And as we got deeper into the details that did spill over to the second hour, it really started to resonate with me I was super impressed but with any theory about something that no living person has experienced shrug my shoulders and fall into that gavin newsome space of just over and over again saying, that is interesting that's just interesting. And then to think this is an event to expect in our lifetimes i mean it's just another layer of unlikeliness but roger does a good job of not over hyping or creating any real expectation

1:15:57 But even just to note the tracking of the magnetic north poles travel since the seventies is insane. You look at that and you think how could there not be some kind of effect or result soon but i'm sure many points in its trajectory people have said that all along the line that it's all gonna be over soon and here we are fifty plus years later And most people would have no idea there was movement at all if it wasn't tracked for them. But with that caveat, I mean this can go on much longer can it? I did look up some added info about it so the movement is actually slowing down significantly from its peak though it's still moving faster than a lot of the historical averages but it has now entered the sharpest

1:16:49 deceleration period that science is ever recorded in the nineteen nineties and before then it cruised at about three to six miles per year. Then from 2000 to 2010 it did speed up significantly to 34-37 miles of movement per year as it moved towards Siberia. And then now, it has decelerated sharply down back to 22-28 miles per year so that still seems like a lot 2 miles per month

1:17:29 given that where we were at just like three to six miles a year, but it is slowing down and if you look at this picture of how it's moved. It's really only just in 2017 crossed over the other side of the North Pole but I'm not sure thats relevant to ECDO because its more about the field getting weak enough for the gyroscopic force to win out but as for strength of the Earth's magnetic field itself They say that around 1 AD the field peaked at its strength of roughly 35% higher than it is today and it's been declining ever since then. In the last 160 years, since direct scientific tracking began in the 1830s, The global average field intensity has reliably dropped by 10%, or roughly 5-7 percent per century

1:18:30 I personally just don't think you can know what the magnetic field was like in 1 AD. You have to make pretty big inferences and assume that the trend stayed consistent based on a small sample size If you have a small data set from 1830 to today, in my mind that's really all you can know There might be other types of fields involved that we never even picked up on. Just so many unknowns, but Rogers ECDO theory is the best I've heard in a long time i can say that kudos to him as for the second hour

1:19:08 We did include the recent coven shot data to that is been highlighting spoiler alert it's alarming. The news is not covering how big the explosion and cancer rates are getting he showed several graphs that help us get our head around that gets beyond just speculation one of the graphs of data was about spending If I recall correctly, just since before the shot our annual spend on cancer has grown by about a third and we were spending a lot in 2017-2018 so to grow an extra third that's crazy. Hearing about these ivermectin and mendesazole studies for cancer are wild too

1:19:57 Then there's doctor artist out there saying that cancer tumors are miss identified parasite egg sacks i mean what. It's a little hard for me to believe that all the people looking at this these tumors over so much time never concluded that and then they have all this tumor detection equipment but we never really see the parasites inside people It is weird of course they don't literally have to be parasite egg sacs for the drugs to work it is still curious that these anti parasitic drugs are having such an outsized. We hear this idea,

1:20:37 that when you penetrate a tumor with the biopsy, that it spreads throughout the body and we know that cancers come back. Well, that would make sense if you don't address the parasites themselves in the doctor-artist scenario that the parasites would create more egg sacs or maybe when you puncture one they spill out like puncturing a spider's nest I dunno But it does feel like the alternative world is actually getting somewhere on cancer despite the sick system's commitment and damn near addiction to radiation.

1:21:13 But that was a big part of the plus show as well as strengthening the overall ECDO case. Get a free week with no credit card required at TheHigherSideChats.com or become a member for eight bucks a month for audio, 12 bucks a month for best in class self-hosted video five new shows a month, a private RSS feed for your Plus membership so you can still use the same podcasting apps you're likely listening to me on now And you get an archive going back to 2010 of many, many timeless classics. When they say THC was much more based I'm told maybe having kids softened me but i maintain i am still based I'm just a little more subtle about it or a little more mature about it I could say

1:22:04 All right, well in higher side news I went to Philly for a few days to basically just be the bridge between the War Mode guys and Chris Knowles. Spade had mentioned to me that he was interested in getting Chris on as a guest and they prefer to record in person so I figured if I just went up there Chris would make the drive down And he did and we recorded a pretty good episode focused on all different aspects of Chris's work and it was great to be a part of. Check out the warm mode feeds for that, I did tweet out the link as well And...I just got this news before hitting record but we lost another good one The great Ron Patton of Paranoia Magazine You've heard me mention him many times He lost his seemingly sudden and not very long battle with cancer Kidney & liver cancer to be specific

1:23:02 He was one of the first friends i made through the podcast he introduced me to many good contacts over the years and helped with booking when i was just getting my feet wet didn't even really know how to reach out to people, you is great even co-hosted a couple shows with me. Anyone on that dan fogler movie bus tour with me and freeman and jamie handshaw when she still dating freeman Good times he was a local we sold paranoia magazine and books at the farmers market sitting there all day i had some good times with them ron also is the one who took over as. Ground zeroes producer when tracy died use of the one who told me that she was afraid of her husband and asked if she could bring her son to stay with them right near the end, add a time when you couldn't accommodate it because

1:23:57 his landlord said no. And I really don't know anything beyond that, but that is something that Ron had said to me. Ron had a lot of information that I think did not get to be told about many different things and a lot of that information is going to go with him to the other side He was always talking to me also about trying to digitize Paranoia Magazine and then constantly falling short And literally last month he put a copy of all the remaining issues that he has in a box and sent them out to me i was planning on doing a solo show getting into him and going over this. Treasure trove of conspiracy articles from the pre internet days stuff that's never been digitized,

1:24:51 I even thought ron could be a part of it he could add a lot of context to who some of these authors were or still are you know they're all gonna be aging out, what a good and important information like i said is just. Gonna be lost with bronze passing we actually talked through text about like having a deeper conversation he was like yes i do want to do that let me just get a few more sessions of radiation done and i should feel up for that And that just didn't happen. I hope Clyde Lewis is able to continue on with his program without having Ron, he did so much and it would be a big struggle to find someone to replace everything Ron was doing at this point So just another rough loss Make sure you check in with the people who are important to you especially if their health is declining I'm constantly feeling like oh that sucks this person's gonna bounce back

1:25:51 And they haven't. But okay, let's talk about the last show with Jordan Crowder and the deep dive into mind hacking probability engineering and the Monroe material I expected it to be somewhat more mixed really but we got ourselves a 4.8 beautiful The comments seem to have been a lot more mixed and it really got the conversation going more so than most episodes do. And it is kind of the sort of fundamental material people are gonna have strong opinions about, like can you hack your reality? How involved can you even be in things that happen all this sorta stuff So yeah It's gonna generate strong reactions on top

1:26:43 People's feelings about the Monroe Institute many think it's a CIA honeypot for finding gifted people bill from war mode. He went down there and he got bad vibes he said I don't know if he thinks it all just a BS scam or something deeper like I just described but he wasn't impressed let's just say that I don't know if he went there directly to try and find a solution for his sleep paralysis, but that was part of what motivated him. And I don't think it helped. But I will take a 4.8 any day especially with this sort of polarizing material and that puts us on a three show roll all having a four point eight or above love to see it join plus stop missing half the show use that free trial etc etc

1:27:33 Okay, the meetup calendar. Make events find other like-minded locals have a good time Here we go all right We do have one today at Dick's primal kitchen in Portland Oregon I don't think this one was on there last time but if you're available today check that out then Gail Braths alehouse Auckland New Zealand That's happening on the 31st. September 5th, Gilbert Arizona Desert Monks Brewing. September 13 Black Stack Brewing St Paul Minnesota and that's it we really only got two for the month of August and 2 for the month of September little bit light but it's just a resource there for you guys maybe don't feel the need to find like minded locals right now but it's a good thing

1:28:26 When you don't feel pressured to do so right then people won't think that she just want something from them nothing all this person actually might be someone nice been time with and have a beer with once in awhile. Anyway, you know how making friends works. I don't have to explain it to ya But big thanks to Roger the ethical skeptic Cunningham for sharing this stuff with us today I know it's pretty dense and the visuals added a lot more context We got some of that in the first hour some of it in the second It's just how it goes sometimes But take care of you and yours, I've done my part. Your move Earthshift secret keepers destructive cycle deniers and preservers and propagandists of the conventional paradigm. You're fucking... Sorry you can't sleep tonight Mama says your scared i hear Well I've checked in every corner And promised there's nothing to fear

1:29:26 Well at least not in your room, kid It might be the only place you're safe So you might as well relax now There's much more to fear when you're awake The reals are outrunnin everything And they're way worse than you can imagine! So don't be scared of your own You can't be bothered by the dark in this life Cause no night light is bright enough

1:30:06 So at least in here be tough. Mouth can, but it's just a little noise Wait until the stresses they put you under Eat up all your dreams and joy Sure I'll check inside Crack the door a little bit as it gets The real monsters are outrun They ain't waiting They're way worse than you can imagine So don't be scared of your own

1:30:57 You can't be bothered by the dark in this life, cause no night light's bright enough! Out there so at least in here be tough Now I gotta say goodnight and sweet dreams Daddy needs some sleep as well Tomorrow you'll be playing grocery store while I'll be walking through a well-engineered hell So don't you worry yourself about it. You're well protected here tonight Insulated from a thousand different nightmares that get very real and I think you'll be alright The real monsters are out running And they're way worse than you can imagine! You can't be bothered by the dark in this life Cause no night light's bright enough

1:32:06 See the world out there so at least in here be tough