22:02 So, timeline-wise you asked. Yes I don't think this happens until Russia and China are ready now Russia has shown in the Ukraine war that it literally has an incompetent conventional military It cannot do combined air warfare and air ground tactics That's a very sophisticated military doctrine which allows one country to control And find the difference between all of the aircraft coming in that are friendly versus foe and ground troops, drones and coordinates so that none of that stuff collides. Russia simply couldn't do that. That's what Ukraine showed. They could do either ground or air or drones but nothing together. And they throw missiles into the mix to ground everything else so nothing else got hit. The US can do that and it is one of the strong points of F-35. The F-35 despite all its flaws is capable of coordinating
23:00 over a hundred targets and aircraft in an area, each one of those aircraft can almost act like an AWACS. And so that's what allows the United States and NATO to do combined warfare to a degree that Russia and probably China cannot do yet now. That said Russia's, of course is a strong point is that it has the most missiles nuclear missiles in the world and missile delivery vehicles with the new Sarmat-2 missile with 15 maneuvering warheads utterly unstoppable. And then I believe we're just starting to deploy this Sarmat 2 and China is really working on its hopeful range of military capability including aircraft carriers as well as missiles
23:49 I don't think they're going to be ready for another probably two to three years at the earliest. So, I'm projecting timeline that we probably have until the latter part of this decade before this war becomes imminent. Now, I'm not saying that people ought to delay their preparations even if we have three years it takes about three years to really get fully prepared if you haven't started so... You know, it's a blessing that isn't imminent and I don't think the Ukraine War will in fact I know it won't go into a nuclear war because Russia can't do the strike on the US until China's ready, because China has the manpower capability to occupy countries. If you just nuke them and you have no ability to occupy then they simply rebuild over time and they come back at you. You've got to occupied it keep them from rebuilding their military strength which we would do even if our military was nuked
24:47 and the civilian infrastructure was preserved. So there is no such thing as throwing a nuke at England or France or at a military base to threaten, because it would invite retaliation and indeed the public would demand retaliation So, they can't nuke. It's an all or none situation. You either throw all your nukes out there and decapitate the enemy or you don't do it at all until you are ready. And that's why I'm projecting that this won't be ready until both Russia and China are ready. Russia will never have the military manpower that China will have, and China probably won't have the military nuclear throw weight that Russia has so they need to work together now. That said,
25:30 enemies at heart russian knows that they have to go ahead with china after the limit the west that's why they have stopped sending any high technology transfers to china for the last ten years. That's why china is now got stolen enough technology through, you know all of the technology deals they done with stupid american companies started to build their product over there, that they're building and have their own high tech industry now but it's still a matter of time. They are both building in a major building project won't probably ready for at least three five years