05:28 So you might have been quoting someone else when you said this, but I've heard you say that the Archon story almost reads like Jesus fan fiction. And I thought that was a great way to put it and I see why someone would say that but it is that interconnection between Christianity and Gnosticism That's sort of confusing to me because I almost feel like they're opposites. Can you clarify that at all? Sure! I will tell you that was a quote from Chris Knowles of The Secret Sun which my favorite blog. He was referring to Gnosticism being, if you read the text and it's true if you look at something like the Gospel of Mary It looks like these groups are writing Jesus fan fiction and he meant that in a positive way because obviously his background and interest is in superheroes and their relationship to gods and the unconsciousness all that kind of stuff His book is called Our Gods Wear Spandex and its excellent
06:19 What he meant by that is, well I guess you have to back it up. We have this default view and it's historically wrong that there was a guy called Jesus the default view even if you're atheist is all the stuff about walking on water and loaves of fish is is Balderdasch but there was obviously this guy wandering around Jerusalem now That's not good history. You're basically just removing the bits you don't like and leaving the bits that you find acceptable, even though they both have zero evidence Now what we're experiencing in, shall we say Bible studies or biblical archaeology is the same thing that happened to Moses in the 70s In the 70s people started to realize Moses never really existed Like here you have Manu, you have Menes, you have all these lawgiver
07:08 types that existed prior to Moses in the story. I mean, there's no parting of the Red Sea, there was no great chunk of Jewish slaves in Egypt—there were plenty of Jews in Egypt but none of these things happened and so you had this kind of tentative put their head above the parapet and say, I don't think this happened! And that was quite radical because obviously biblical archaeology sort of province of retired Church of England vicars and really quite Bible-thumping, sort of Southern American... well, Southern State American Christian groups would fly over to Israel and dig up stuff and say look I found the Palace of Solomon. So you're dealing with a hundred and fifty years of academia that has a vested interest in a particular version of the story Now that version of the story is Jesus
07:57 existed and there's like zero evidence at all that that ever happened. And every piece of his life is foreshadowed in previous myths now this is fine because if you look at the groups, I mean you get This is really quite popular amongst atheist groups at the moment like hooray Jesus didn't exist That equals there was no God Now thats a really bad cognitive jump Because when I encountered this material I thought the opposite My problem with Jesus Was always that the stories were not correct like this is just garbage these things physically happen. What appears to be the case is it at the time you had people like final about alexandria talking about the logos which is a greek idea of this the word of this animating force from the divine kind of
08:46 By encountering or experiencing that you redeem yourself and the world we start to see all these pieces that fall into the kind of jesus narrative later so these are these groups where i think they would have been quite long when people came over from. Let's say Rome or Italy, or the North Mediterranean Roman province and said so this Jesus guy where did he live? And they'd be like I'm sorry what? Where did Superman live there you're talking about things that can't exist on a physical plane. When you realize that a lot of bizarre pieces of the Gospels make sense The Gospel of Mary which i mentioned before is actually one of my favorite gospel texts
09:26 And they're all sitting in this room and I think it's Peter, might have been Paul but sort of says to Mary why is Jesus talking to you? She bursts into tears and it's basically like do you think I made this up. Do you think I'm I'm just inventing this son of God talking to me in my head. And you go, well that's really weird why don't they just ask him? Is he in the room with him if he is talking to Mary and then you suddenly think hang on I am reading a transcript of his seance. Right! And when you hear Jesus say whenever there are two or three gathered in My name I am there, seance not an actual seance like they're summoning a dead person but what your seeing here the filtering through of the idea that Jesus is a concept, and I mean that they literally believed in him but they didn't believe he existed in the physical world. You see it sort of accidentally filtering through these texts and then you get the inevitable conflating down for imperial Roman political reasons of a definitive story that they can lock down and control
10:20 And that's been the one that we've decided was actual history. And that's really spun us for a loop for quite some time, 50-60 years. That's the other reason why getting a bead on Gnosticism is like well so what is Jesus in some kind of spaceship? In this one and he's talking through a cave and now he's in a shipwreck. What's happening here? It's because Ideas particularly for the gnostics because it's the material realm was not what was divine but it wasn't perfect. Jesus physically couldn't exist in the physical realm because its production of the demiurge, created by a false god and if he is perfect he can't be down here so he exists in this realm that you need to contact him and get that redemption or rebirth through the son Logos, this Jesus figure
11:09 And there you have the kind of, I would say 80% of the reason why it's so confusing when you get... When you encounter Gnosticism through parapolitics where it is so confusing to get your head around. Well where are these terms that are coming at me from? Like Archon and like Demiurge because I'm all at sea with them and that's largely why you're talking about a really exciting but very chaotic soup of different ideas encountering each other and mixing in a time of quite significant economic and social change You're right man, it is super tough but wow you really got me with those seance examples. That really explains why we see this mixing of magic and early Christianity and why the Gospels are so weird At least it makes a lot of sense to me because I had kind of been thinking that the two really just clashed Because didn't Gnosticism predate Christianity? And I guess we can say that none of them saw Jesus as a real person which I wasn't sure about But I guess your saying all came later with Romans right