Topic: Psycop

Psycop comes up in 3 chapters across 3 episodes of The Higherside Chats Free Show, from June 2015 to January 2016.

June 2015 January 2016

Related topics

Alain Nu | Mentalism, Manifestation, Strange Experiences, &  Improving Your Psychic Ability
• 7:05 - 10:46

Alain Nu | Mentalism, Manifestation, Strange Experiences, & Improving Your Psychic Ability

Marcello Truzzi, Scientific Exploration of Mystery

The conversation highlights the work of Marcello Truzzi, a professor of psychology at the University of Michigan and a founding member of several major organizations including CSICOP and the Psychic Entertainers Association. Truzzi is credited with bridging the gap between scientific skepticism and the study of paranormal claims. Nu explains how Truzzi’s vision influenced his own belief that magic and mentalism serve as doorways to developing the latent powers of the human mind.

marcello truzzipsycoppsychic entertainers associationsociety for scientific explorationpsychologyuniversity of michigan
Courtney Brown | Remote Viewing Iapetus, Mars, Atlantis, & More
• 1:58 - 4:44

Courtney Brown | Remote Viewing Iapetus, Mars, Atlantis, & More

Scientific Skepticism, Professional Debunkers vs. Open Minds

Courtney Brown addresses skepticism by distinguishing between "professional debunkers" and true skeptics who maintain an open mind while evaluating data. He criticizes organizations like the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (PSYCOPS) for being as dogmatic as religious institutions. Brown argues that a proper skeptic should not take anything on blind faith but should instead examine the methodology and data collection processes used in experiments.

Greg Carlwood on SiriusXM’s The All Out Show
• 1:58 - 4:44

Greg Carlwood on SiriusXM’s The All Out Show

Scientific Skepticism, Proper Definition of Open-Mindedness

Courtney Brown addresses skeptics by distinguishing between "professional debunkers" and true scientific skeptics. He criticizes organizations like PSICOPS for being as dogmatic as religious institutions, arguing that they often have an agenda to dismiss claims regardless of evidence. Brown defines a proper skeptic as someone who remains open-minded and insists on evaluating raw data and methodology rather than relying on blind faith or predetermined conclusions.

skepticismpsycopsscientific investigationdogmatic beliefsdata evaluation