Topic: Court Of Appeals

Wayne Rohde explains how the government uses Dravet Syndrome and the SCN1A gene mutation to dismiss DTaP injury claims. He details the legal precedent set by the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, which allows the government to compel genetic testing and deny compensation if a child is predisposed to seizures, regardless of the vaccine's role as a trigger.

A class-action lawsuit filed by a Jets fan against the New England Patriots following the Spygate scandal resulted in a significant legal ruling regarding the nature of sports. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals determined that a ticket purchase is merely a license to view an event, not a guarantee that the game will be played by specific rules or without cheating. Legally, professional sports are classified as entertainment—similar to the ballet or movies—meaning leagues can technically fix their own games without committing fraud.

The discussion addresses the role of "collection agencies" or controlled opposition groups in the 9/11 truth movement that steer people toward specific theories. Dr. Wood details her legal battle, which reached the Supreme Court, challenging the official reports. She notes that the Court of Appeals acknowledged the law applied to her case but dismissed it regardless, illustrating the difficulties of pursuing legal accountability.