46:06 things down the line, theoretically per them will be so bad that we can ignore all this other stuff. And we have to implement the stuff as laid out by this global public private partnership right now because it's so urgent you don't have time to think about it. Mm hmm. And I mean there's really so much to get into when we're talking about this but like I said earlier I mentioned this effort to sort of merge Wall Street with the IMF and The World Bank That's coming technically from the UN because one of the bodies implementing all of these SGGs, you have GFANS, The Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero. It's co-chaired by Mark Carney a central banker and Michael Bloomberg an oligarch of the United States who I mean if you look into his history there is no way that this guy is like a good guy but trust him now they say so
47:01 The Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero basically wants to turn the IMF and World Bank, no longer have it be a financial weapon of US empire which US military documents say they are by the way. They want it to be the financial weapon of the members of GFANS, which includes organizations like BlackRock, HSBC Bank Of America. I mean the biggest banks in the world basically and it's going to be their financial weapon and it's going to be used basically following the same debt slavery model to have countries implement the SDGs. So, SDG 17 says that this global partnership needs to establish macroeconomic stability as a prerequisite to all the other SDGs which by the way most people think that SDGs are about climate change only one of them deals with climate there's 17 of them only one deals with climate yeah it's about transforming every part of our lives from the most intimate to the most distant
47:57 in terms of most intimate, I mean they want to control family planning and stuff like that. Very intimate decisions being given to this top-down control system but when you're Going back to GFANs and SGG17, this macroeconomic stability stuff. The way the UN even defines it is not what most people think macroeconomic stability is I mean just like how they've redefined sustainable development they've redefined macroeconomics stability you know before it used to mean like a good economic growth at maximum employment low inflation no no that's not what it means to the UN anymore when they say it What they mean is
48:35 having enough what they call fiscal space to implement the SDGs. And then they don't even have a firm definition for what fiscal space is? They basically say it's the sustainable debt load, basically necessary to implement the SDGs. So it's the space that you have to make in your budget to implement the SDGs but for most countries it's going to be debt. It's going to be taking on more debt and even The World Bank has admitted... Basically I'm paraphrasing because I don't have it in front of me but you're welcome to look at my article they say debt is a critical form of financing for the Sustainable Development Goals they are going to entrap
49:12 you know, developing nations particularly in debt to make them implement the SDGs whether they want to or not because they're saying it's a global imperative. So a lot of these countries that are in the UN or that have signed on to Agenda 2030 or were signed on by previous government they're going to have to implement and they're gonna had to take on loads of debt which means cutting other services, austerity for everything else. And here comes the global transformation and it's bankers running the show. It's bankers that she's behind this Mark Carney and Michael Bloomberg are the people that you unpicked for their climate envoys basically I forget their exact titles but Michael Bloomberg is something like the UN envoy for Climate Ambition and Solutions. And I think Mark Carney is something about like climate financing or
50:00 or something like that. These are the people they've picked to run the show, right? By the way what I mentioned earlier about HSBC and getting caught money laundering for drug cartels one of the guys that covered that up was Mark Carney now he's in charge but trust him he cares about the planet so does Mike Bloomberg they care about the planet don't worry about it i mean it's just it's a joke it's a sick joke And no one's really looking behind the curtain here because sustainable development sounds nice and all of the little like phrase descriptors of each SDG sound nice, and things like we can get behind right? Like No Poverty. No Hunger. Health Care for Everyone. Protect The Environment you know okay so most people aren't going to be against that stuff but what people don't realize is that behind each SDG there's already a mechanism or entity