33:37 Thank you so much for recognizing that and for being astute and observant. We wish fire scientists would be as clear-headed and open minded, as you have just proven yourself to be Gregg. We're going to get real specific with you we are aware of three experiments that have been televised using a pig as a substitute for the human body in an attempt to debunk so called spontaneous human combustion actually four experiments. Three of them have been done by John DeHaan, whom we mentioned earlier is a renowned highly regarded and highly paid fire forensics expert in the United States The first experiment he did was for the BBC in a program that also involved our participation if I recall the date correctly 1999
34:31 He used a pig as a stand-in for human body, which is a fair stand in. The pig will burn quite similarly to the human body so it's a fair substitute for human corpse however the first thing he did was pour a liter of gasoline on the pig and he said he had to do that because he needed to raise the heat of combustion sufficiently so that the adipose tissue would then become self sustaining and combustible As we pointed out, Murray Reeser and Dr. Bentley and all the other cases that we're going to discuss with you today did not involve any external application of an accelerant such as gasoline or kerosene so it was a really bogus experiment but at the end of it there was still certainly enough of the pig left that any competent forensic anthropologist could have identified the remains as being foreseen not human
35:25 John did two other experiments, if we recall correctly. Both of which erupted in large combustion events so that external suppression fire equipment had to be brought in to quell the fire otherwise the entire burn chamber would have burned down again. We don't find those situations with Mary Reeser and Dr. Bambino and the other cases that we detail in our book ablaze The episode that is most fascinating and most perplexing only we can tell you about because only we have the data to support improve the statement that we're about to make for you. The experiment that John DeHaan did, that is most revealing and reveals just the extent to which I debunker will go do not have to face the concept of spontaneous human combustion aka sudden human cremation is one that he did for the Learning Channel
36:22 In this experiment, to substitute for the human body he took a fistful of candles wrapped in cotton fabric laid it on a chair and ignited it. Shortly afterwards he stands in the burn chamber and points to a localized fire on the chair faces the camera and says look localized fire no surrounding material significantly damaged looks like classic SHC but clearly isn't. This is the wick effect, proves that SHC doesn't happen." That is his on-camera testimony and to every viewer of that program it would make perfect sense. Renowned professional fire investigator in a white lab jacket does the experiment produces the result he anticipates and debunks SHC Here's the problem
37:26 That is not what happened. How do we know this? Because the production company that did the filming with us and then for John's experiment, sent us the original DVD submission that they gave to The Learning Channel and there was a huge difference between what they filmed and what The Learning Channel chose to broadcast. What is that difference? It revolves around two points. First point is this Why would a renowned professional fire investigator substitute for the human body, a fistful of candles? The human body is not 100% paraffin wax. Everybody should recognize this! The reason candles are made with paraffin wax is because paraffin wax will sustain a low heat combustion process
38:25 The human body does not. The human body contains not just adipose tissue, but bone and bone is incredibly difficult substance to burn in old structure fires and gasoline fuel automobile accidents. Teeth and hipbone often are left intact to identify the incinerated victim in those fire situations. Second point of Mr. DeHaan's televised experiment. He did not have a self-contained, localized self extinguishing fire the original experiment on the DVD that the production company sent to us shows that this fire raged initially out of control there was a huge flaming open flame combustion process that was about to go flash over
39:27 That's when the air in a burned area is so hot that the room would literally explode instantaneously into flame. Fire suppression equipment was brought in to quench this raging inferno that was about to engulf the chair and all of the props Mr. DeHaan had set around the chair. For Mr. DeHaan, after that happened he walked back into that burn chamber, kneeled down beside the chair and said look localized combustion and imply that it was self-extinguished is nothing but an overt, blatant lie. And we have the evidence to support that statement if he wants to file a suit against us for making that statement, John DeHaan come at us because we will blow you away
40:18 I like it, stirring the spontaneous human combustion researcher drama pot. Let's go! Yeah let's go come at us unfortunately this is the extent to which the naysayers will go the lengths to which they were stretched evidence and untruths so that they simply don't have to face up to something that they are on trained you have to accept. Right, right well that is a thorough deconstruction of the debunkers and their attempts to duplicate or explain this stuff while we still have some time in the first hour I wanted to maybe outline another case maybe one that you consider a classic case? The book starts with Dr Bentley uh maybe tell people a little bit about that case We would love to tell your listeners