Crrow777 | Skywatching Anomalies & The Lunar Wave

00:04 On the higher side chats, we explore the world's deepest conspiracies its mysteries and the all-around fringe on a quest that can't be sponsored by anyone but loyal listeners looking to take that ride. So if you enjoy the first hour of the show, courtesy of those subscribers we hope that you'll consider becoming one for just $5 a month and get a second hour each THC episode where we pack in twice as much interesting content with all our great guests. Just sign up on our members website at TheHigherSideChatsPlus.com and you'll have instant access to ALL the extended content since Plus began! An opportunity to make topics & guest suggestions

00:41 and your own custom RSS feed where you'll hear the full two-hour show in one convenient uninterrupted file. And most importantly, you won't hear this repetitive reminder at the start of every show that listener supported communities are the future of media and entertainment... ...and you want to be part of that future don't you? In the 1930s, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt addressed a nation through a series of radio broadcast known as the Fireside Chats. His aim was to reassure the common man that our society would recover from its troubled times but we're far from 1930 and I deal with a different kind of fire For a new era of worldly frustration We offer a fresh conversation!

01:36 How's it going, Ironside Chatters? Drink a little drink. Smoke in a little smoke! I'm Greg Carlwood doing what i do in sunny San Diego and today is gonna get pretty interesting We did have a Moneybomb winner by the name of Mariah I broke her off about 250 bucks but we probably won't hear from her until next week So let's just get weird right out of the gate. See, we all know that the various elements that make up reality are manipulated by an elite that goes back centuries and in that time there have been many opportunities to shape reality for the masses warping and suppressing ancient texts that talk about our origins covering up any ongoing connection to non-human entities removing magic from the mainstream And we get attached to things that think we know The truths we've been taught from an early age

02:21 Like the world is a big ball of nothing but rock beneath our feet in an iron core. Or if the technology for free energy devices existed, they'd give it to us or that giants never roamed the lands Well why wouldn't it be in school? Why wouldn't scientists tell us the truth? Why would universities doctors geologists museums politicians government institutions and multinational corporations lie to us Well, they're all founded and funded by the old boys banking priesthoods of however long ago. At least that's the broad strokes with which I paint my reality and I think most people here are familiar with that outlook as well In a major area of speculation and investigation on this journey to revealment is into NASA and the space programs of the world Why does The Vatican have one of the most advanced observatories on the planet? Why are so many whistleblowers talking about bases on the moon and Mars and secret space fleets beyond what we're told is possible

03:12 Why does NASA use such cryptic names for their probes and missions? Why are all of their photos and footage of major events being called into question with researchers finding errors that make you wonder if entire missions even took place. Lots of questions and some of these conspiracies are coming to a head with modern technology And we're wondering why more people aren't getting great footage of Bigfoot or aliens on their phones Or how could there be bases on the moon when the technology to view it is getting into the hands of armchair astronomers? Why aren't people seeing stuff, or if the earth is really hollow. Why haven't satellite operators in Google blown the whistle on it? Why can't we see those polar openings for Christ's sake

03:51 I admit, a lot of these secrets seem almost too big to keep in 2015 and we've yet to really expose anything quite as shocking as the things i mentioned but it's easy to forget how far back this shadowy elite might go. And it's easy to forget that these secret societies and bankster priesthoods have been molding, shaping and forming the world around us back to Sumeria and beyond. I think it is easy to underestimate that type of advantage Always being 50 steps ahead knowing that any education Any technology Any scientific discovery Is going to come from someone who has passed through the gatekeepers guard To even have a telescope in the 17th century To even have a PhD or credential of any kind

04:32 You have to go through their official channels, and your lens is thoroughly altered by their process. And a credential isn't as much a testament of your brilliant mind as much it is your willingness to follow directions and take the textbook before you as the gospel truth so help ye God." Now I bring all this to your attention so early in the game because we're going to explore some strange alternatives to the ideas that we have about our world. Primarily one very radical possibility brought on by some interesting footage captured by today's guest who wishes to remain anonymous, to a large extent He operates a YouTube channel under the name Crow777 with two Rs and included with this episode you should find links or embeds to some of his videos that we talk about in the show. And the first half hour is interesting but it's really just foreplay, to get you warmed up and ready for some examination and speculation over Crows holy grail of strange footage The Lunar Wave

05:23 It's just the type of show I like to do, a unique perspective and strange ideas that break from the conspiracy herd as well as a well-spoken lucid guest. Usually when we talk about space in the conspiracy world were talking about a secret group being far more advanced reaching farther into the vast universe than were told on the surface And today we're examining almost the polar opposite possibility that we've done far less in space than we've been led to believe. With that, I'll just drop you into the action exploring the wide range of anomalies and oddities captured through the lens of today's co-pilot The Man We Call Crow Enjoy! Sweet dreams to the elite

06:06 I'm out on THC Uncovering secrets and conspiracies Everybody's looking for something Some of them want to use you Some of them want to get used by you Some of them want to abuse you Some of them want to be abused Alright people, we know the planet's puppet masters have lied to us about nearly infinite things in rewritten history in many different ways and we've explored some pretty fringe possibilities of what the underlying truth may be in some areas. Some more far out than others and todays guest wants to remain fairly anonymous but goes by the name of Crow Online you might have seen his YouTube channel crow777 where he has captured

06:59 some pretty high-res footage of many strange UFOs and orbs in the sky, as well as something called the Lunar Wave which has created quite a buzz in the conspiracy community. We're going to discuss these things what they might mean for us and what the larger implications might be I know I'm excited have him here welcome to show Crow Thanks for having me. Yeah, man this is awesome! Thanks for doing it I know you like your privacy but at the same time you've got some really interesting ideas about the true nature of reality that i think are going to be really fun to explore and uh... To get this started You've got some great footage can you tell us about your process in the equipment use at all?

07:35 Well, I started with a classic Meade telescope which has an 8-inch aperture. And I had a Canon which was 18 megapixels of DSLR. That's how this all started and as it got going people took an interest in what I was shooting. They kept urging me to do crowdsourced funding to upgrade my equipment close to a year in I actually did and it succeeded. And I upgraded to a much bigger scope, and I use a Celestron now, and I got a much better camera. The camera that I use now is a Nikon D800 but what's special about it besides the fact that it has 36 megapixels

08:15 which is beneficial in the editing room, allows you to really zoom in on things. The pixels do not dither together so on these objects that can be really small if we are shooting the moon or something the imagery has gotten a lot better. And to top it off I've also upgraded and have an H-alpha solar telescope which I am just beginning to use now. So that's where I'm at. Right on man, good to know because regardless of what you've captured just the level of crisp detail in your videos is worth acknowledging and it might be good info for anyone else wanting to become a sky watcher. So often people think they've captured amazing things but the footage is so blurry or shaky that you can't even tell! And you got that angle on Locke's so I have to say kudos to you on that one at least man

09:00 well in this game the truth is that resolution is king if you produce shaky video out of focus video uh... video that's just not that great you're not really adding much to the conversation because at the end of the day you'll never be able to determine what you're looking at So from the get-go, my aim has been to produce the highest quality I can and everything I've shot to date is HD but there are levels of HD. You can always get better. Right right so To add a little bit more on the fire for people who might be skeptical about some of the things we're going to Get into do you have a background or any credentials that may lend credibility? To your opinion or ability to interpret the footage you're getting Can you go into that at all

09:45 Well, I suppose in terms of being a part of the UFO community or something like that. No not really I've been a one-man show I was a radio operator in the Marine Corps and I've been into astronomy I got that the first scope that I described to you I got that in the mid 90s Right before the Hillbop comet came around and I've been doing it ever since so I guess The only real credential that I can claim is experience, that I have literally many thousands of hours of viewing time. Since I've been filming probably many more thousands of hours. There are very few people that I know or am aware who have put in the hours

10:26 for even just moon observation that I have. One guy that comes to mind is Bill Bryson, but i don't think he's posted anything on YouTube in over a year but there's another man who put in literally thousands of hours and he came to the conclusion that when we look at the moon were not looking at what we've been told and I think there was one other guy I was aware of but uh... I don't even remember his name at this point yet, he hasn't posted in so long Before we get into the really wild stuff, you have caught a lot of odd looking UFOs. What do you think some of these things could be? Do you have any idea? I think the simple explanation for almost everything i've shot is human technology and while you know, I don't discount the possibility that there's other beings out there as a matter of fact. I would find it strange if I found out that there were no others besides us but having said that to make the claim that you're looking at an alien craft...I mean you need to have evidence to do that and I have shot some strange things

11:26 leave a lot of questions up in the air, but at the end of day I opt to start at human technology and then work from there. Can you tell the people maybe about some of the things you've captured that are kind of shocking or might be beyond what we're told our level of technology should because there's some pretty far out stuff. Yeah, I mean I have a number of clips that kind of fit that description but i think one it's one of my more popular clips its titled The Shooting Orb now i kind of split my time between nighttime shooting a lot of moon work and daytime shooting in the daytime shooting i cover chemtrails because it is such a huge concern now you know there's a lot of people that are not aware that this was going on and have been told that we're looking at contrails for those of us who put in the time

12:19 to actually do the field work look up film watch what's going on we understand that there are planes overhead spraying things having said that quite often when were filming chemtrails we get what's called orbs for other unidentifiable things flying around now if there was something but i shot that is hard to imagine as human technology i would say the shooting or clip is it it looks like a ball of light and uh... it travels down into a cam trail there were tons of them in the sky that day and what was unusual about that day if we could see them with our eyes we knew that we were filming them quite often we don't know we've caught anything tour reviewing the video but on this day we knew we were shooting war because we could see them

13:04 And so this orb travels into the chemtrail and it literally fires a beam or plasma or something. It fires it twice, and you can see it very clearly in the clip. That one's hard to explain because if it is human tech, its tech that I have – I can't compare it to anything that I've ever been aware of. So I think of all my clips, that one really stands out Yeah, that is an intense one. And outside of that clip are you seeing a larger scale connection between orbs in the sky and chemtrails? Yeah I mean i don't think there's any doubt we don't know...or I don't know everything I would like to know but I have spent so many hours shooting in the daytime um..I have never shot an orb of any kind when chemtrails were not present So I think there's a direct correlation now the question becomes

13:57 Are they with the chemplains? Or are the chemplains dropping them off?" And I don't think that's the case because we have filmed them quite a ways away from chemtrails, heading towards them. We've also filmed them leaving chemtrails and going just straight up until we can't see them anymore So, I know that's not a lot to go on but that's kind of where we're at right now. Just really wondering what the origin of these things is." Yeah it is very far out and there are, I guess far-out possibilities for it you know the motif that there are ET races that are helping humanity from behind the scenes? That was the major motif behind the idea of crop circles

14:39 Do you get any indication that they might be doing some type of cleanup of chemtrails in a covert way? Well, I can say this. I have seen footage online Of others who clearly have caught orbs and it looks like the trails are dissipating around the orbs to some degree I've kind of felt that way as i filmed them. I don't get a dark feeling, you know when I'm filming chemplains I kind of have a dark feeling because in my heart I'm thinking this isn't good for us but when I see the orbs I don't get a negative perception of them per se and they absolutely are attracted and in the chemtrails and if I had to guess I would guess and this is a flat-out guess that they are not with the chemplain's but again that's just the best guess I can give

15:28 Right, right. It's all speculation at this point but since the biggest factor in the chemtrail debate is identifying the difference between Chemtrails and contrails can you give us any clarity there that might help people who are kind of on the fence with that one? Well, to be honest the whole contrail argument really isn't very valuable. It's a disinformation thing I mean you're talking about ice crystals A lot of times you'll see the planes trail change or shut off I've got footage on my YouTube channel Of the trail just stopping and then starting again It seems unlikely that a con trail would do that. A lot of times, I'm in Southern California like you and we're looking at 10 to 15 percent humidity and although I understand humidity levels can be different at different altitudes, I've lived here my whole life and this is basically a chaparral desert. When the humidity is really low, you don't see clouds yet we see these trails and the real problem comes in

16:27 is that we see them spraying in a couple ways. The really persistent trails that you see, they stay around for hours and then they kind of spread out and turn the sky milky but we see a lot of really high altitude spraying and using flight radar we know these planes are over 40 thousand feet so I mean what is it? That's like seven, maybe 7.5 miles or something like that and they're spraying a non-persistent chemtrail but it's like this powdery junk that falls down and mixes and again it has the same effect the whole sky either becomes shiny or milky white The main thing I can say about contrails is

17:06 I live in a flight path, and you're in San Diego too so you understand how many planes are coming in and out of here. Absolutely! Well...I'm positioned so that all inbound traffic is south of me and all outbound traffic is north of me And then there's the big circle all the way around me when they're on a flight pattern to land we have never ever seen these commercial planes leave a trail of any kind contrail or otherwise and there's also the argument you know what people come imposed on my site snippets from different websites claiming that modern jet engines don't need control uh... i don't know if that's true but we don't see controls on commercial airliners dot i'd know that for a fact

17:51 Well, let me ask you as somebody who has been keeping an eye on the sky for so long. Have you seen chemtrails increase over the years just in general? Yeah I mean even today um i'm sitting outside right now and there's a powdery look and we saw them flying over 40 000 feet matter of fact I wanted to start filming but I had to come jump on a phone to do this with you! And it's that the powdery non-persistent stuff... there's one going over the fun right now there's a campaign spraying over the sun at this very minute and you will look up in the sky right now and the sign is completely blotted out but the rest of the sky is reasonably blue uh... yeah there's an increased it's uh... it's almost non-stop at this point

18:37 In one of your videos, I did think it was interesting as for the argument about commercial airliners not doing this. One of the planes in one of your videos looks completely unmarked which i thought was really odd It just looks like a white plane We get that a lot. There's a few different types of planes that do this and to be honest with you we have filmed Virgin planes which I know do commercial jobs as well but, we have seen Virgin planes leaving trails and a lot of really high ones that seem to have no numbers, no nothing and occasionally they look

19:13 plane but there might be a single stripe occasionally a red or blue stripe they look some of them look like big tanker type military planes as well that again have no you know in indicative markings that you can see uh... part of the problem with that is we don't always have the best angle to see them because were way down here and even though i'm using it telephoto with a double on it um... you know you're looking at something that's at times beyond seven miles away from me i mean if you think about a plane it's sixty thousand feet uh... doing the math my what is that some like nine miles or something like that i mean that's a that's a hell of a distance to shoot and also we noticed that the color of these planes doesn't help sometimes you know you see all these

19:58 postings on YouTube where people say, oh it's a holographic plane or there is no plane. Well I've used the telescope and I've used the telephoto to film these guys and what i can tell you is when they're high enough just the paint job on them makes them darn near invisible." And you have captured what looks to be some type of cloaked plane before too right? Yeah, that was a little while ago and it was unfortunate because I didn't have time to set up my tripod because it was happening so quickly. I was trying to get a chem plane and when you're using a telephoto with a doubler if your not on a tripod every jiggle translates into the video but what

20:38 What happened was, I filmed the chemtrail and then when I got in the editing room... ...I saw something cross the chemtrail at a lower altitude. It almost looks like it's got one of these adaptive paint jobs or something. It was much lower than the chemplain and I couldn't see it with my eye. And then in the editing room I could barely see it And I did title that clip cloak plane though, I would imagine it's probably some kind of adaptive paint job or something about the skin of the plane that just makes it near impossible to see. Yeah, that one's pretty far out. I haven't seen much like that and there was also some type of...I think you called it a chem tracking device that you caught here in San Diego Can you tell us about that? Yeah so that day It was before I had upgraded my equipment And we had the 8-inch out and we were determined to film the chemplanes with an eight inch telescope Which is a very difficult thing to do because telescopes are not made to track a moving object

21:38 But my wife, who does this with me has very good eyes and she spotted what we thought was an orb. And so I was scrambling to get the telescope on it by pure luck I managed to. We thought that were looking at an orb for the first time a really high magnification. Were really excited about it perfectly round no tether kind of glowing look to it but what happened is as we filmed it blew up in midair then all this debris came out of it and this kind of red, amber-looking glowing thing fell. And we tracked it as far as we could until the roof blocked it but when I reviewed the footage I realized that it was akin to a weather balloon but the strange thing is we were out there

22:25 when the first there were two camplains that flowner very low altitude we saw the first one ran and got the scope drug it out got all set up and when the second plane flew by this object appeared just under that second planes path i mean more reasonably sure that that was dropped by the second plane and we did look into weather balloons and we found a you're not supposed to launch whether balloons in a flight path which we are in a flight path and there's always other rules like s You're supposed to be able to terminate the flight in a couple different ways. You're supposed to report every so many minutes, but although we did not see the plane drop it for the life of us were like 90 some percent sure that second plane dropped it and then reviewing the video we could see that there was like

23:10 tethered device that was like a red ember that fell and so I just assumed it was probably some kind of tracking device to give them data on what they're about. Hmm, man that is so interesting! So what do you think is the purpose or agenda behind Chemtrails? There's a lot of different theories out there where are you lying on this one Well, I think part of the problem with chemtrails is too many people are really wildly speculating which I don't think helps people to understand that this is a real thing. People that have families and jobs and don't have time in their life to go out and determine what's going on above my head

23:51 Having said that, there's so much deception in the times we live in and I have come to understand that when we see the powers-that-be doing deceptive things they usually have many purposes. It's not often that I recognize some deception that isn't doing two or three or four or more things at one time. I think that the apex reasonable assumption here is that weather modification is going on there are plenty of bills you can look up uh... china has launched a weather modification bureau they were actively going to change their whether during the last olympics but within china these are all documented things you can work out but beyond that you know lab reports from around the world

24:36 and this is where the conversation gets dicey because people like to come in and say well those are unprofessional lab reports, they make many arguments but at the end of the day we're seeing three common heavy metals in most of the reporting that's been done by private individuals and uh... even like tahoe i i had read an article about that or whether with aluminum or barium i forget what it was but one of these chemtrail related metals the level of that going up in lake tahoe when i'm standing out here now looking at the sun blotted out i can also begin to imagine dead blocking sunlight has no fact beyond weather what that is um...

25:16 I'm not really willing to speculate because i would prefer that people understand something is going on than to provide a wild-ass guess and you know have them shut their ears to the matter and not understand. That's true, but we have seen a lot of science about vitamin D and how important that is. There's a lot of speculation that even just keeping people inside corralled in little cubicles and under fluorescent lights away from the sun alone has an effect so I could see taking that to the extreme trying to block out the sun in some way, to decrease the level of vitamin D if you're trying to make everybody sick with some type of depopulation agenda. I feel like that would fit in that wheelhouse

26:01 I think there's, you can't really deny that. We know for a fact that the chemtrails are blocking huge amounts of sunlight that would have otherwise come down to us but there is really no arguing that. The point is proving intent and that's a whole other thing and that what makes all this so difficult but I kind of feel like we're coming to a point where The whole global warming argument that was started so many years ago This is all going to tie together And I think that it's going to be opening up more where they're going to come at it like we didn't have a choice You know the planet was gonna catch on fire. It'll melt or whatever their argument for the day is I think that's going to be

26:46 one of the big excuses that she is now some of my friends uh... but i'm close with the do a lot of research have claimed they've read documents state from powers that be once they started doing this under no circumstances could they stop and the problem without whether it was a lot more information to go with it you know if we consider that this has been going on since probably at least ninety six and now at least where I live, there's really not a week you can't go out and see it going on every day. Yeah somethings afoot and if the lab reports are even close to correct that's not good for us having huge amounts of sunlight reflected off us thats not good for us so yeah its easy to say correctly this is not good for us its very difficult to talk about intent and why its being done

27:40 It is, it is. And there's a lot of speculation out there that chemtrails might have some type of connection with like the HARP array Have you seen any indicator that would be true outside just speculation? Well, I can and actually I do have a background in radio. One of the things we did in radio was bounce radio waves off the ionosphere and we would bounce them off the ocean say if were you know in Japan or Florida or something and wanted to bounce a signal on a new continent that's kind how you would go at it depending upon what type of radio your using

28:16 But what we see here, first hand and I believe like I've got footage of this up somewhere is you'll begin to see a frequency pattern in the cloud cover that the chemtrails have made. It looks kind of like beach sand and uh... The problem with that is people say oh well the wind does that Well the real problem with it for those of us who pay attention film and observe It happens in very confined areas and you'll see these frequency patterns so I don't doubt for a second that these false feelings of clouds that are being put in could be used to bounce radio waves around. Wow, that's scary but it is interesting that you actually have a background that has done things like bouncing radio waves off the ionosphere

29:00 Is there any other element to the whole HAARP conspiracy that you could possibly shed some light on because of your background? Well, the real problem with trying to do any research on HAARP is that it is such an upfront topic a ton of absolute crazy and it kind of absolute denial so to find any middle ground there becomes very difficult i mean again these are things that you can look up where weather modification as a means of warfare i think that started out openly where you could see documents, I think it's the 80s don't quote me but there are documents that you can find about governments intending to modify weather for warfare and that has been associated with HAARP installations and other installations like in other countries so I do not think that is far-fetched to consider these things have gone on.

29:55 Man. And we also know, you know really low frequency I guess they call it ELF E L F extremely low frequency radio waves has some really dire effects on human beings depending on how they're used and the amount of exposure you get Yeah, that doesn't sound great either. I wanted to ask you about one particular UFO video you have that is really interesting but it also- It kind of looks like a gliding bird in front of the moon You-I think you call it the boomerang UFO What makes you uh...think that wasn't a gliding bird? Is it because of the distance from the camera?

30:34 Well yeah, it's definitely. So I have a Schmidt cast grain style scope my old scope was that style and this one so most people don't understand because they've never used one how the focus works. As an example i can set up my scope at night pointed at the moon and put my head you know a foot away from the aperture in front of the scope and you don't see ahead you see the light dim That's what you see. So when birds go by, they have to be... Well I've got pictures here, here is a good example. I've got images of planes that I shot just by chance as I was filming the moon some of them are in perfect focus and some of them are not quite in focus and yet they're two three miles away from me so it could gain focus on something with this style telescope They have to be quite a ways away And I posted many pictures of birds so people can see what that looks like

31:28 For the most part, they go through frame very quickly and they're see-through because they are not in focus. This object is absolutely in a weightless environment or flying as if it was weightless I guess that's a better way to say it and it was absolutely at distance because its as in focus as the moon behind it is But what's crazy about that object is, this is kind of the genesis story of how Crow started. It was the supermoon of 2012 and I had family over we were going to watch the moon just optically through the scope my nephew at one point said hey there are

32:06 triangles tumbling in front of the moon. So, of course we all took our turn and each one of them...each one of us saw these objects tons of them what's crazy about this is reviewed for two to three hours and anyone who watches the moon knows from our point-of-view that the Moon appears to move over that time yet these triangular objects remained between us and the Moon I don't even know how many, and at one point my brother-in-law saw a formation of five to seven of them. And we were blown away! That's what... Next day I went out and got the stuff that I needed to begin to film Now we're assuming that object you are referring too is an object like that because it is triangular We saw the first ones through an eyepiece so we probably had a bit crisper view

32:55 But what you'll see is it spins one way, spins the other way. Noses down, noses up clearly under intelligent control and I do have varying versions of that clip that I've zoomed in on. It's absolutely technology of some kind and its absolutely under intelligent control. What it is? That's a whole other thing And another point to draw away from the idea that it could be a bird, can you get any indication of scale or size? This thing seems like because of the distance it'd be way too big to be a bird. It would be more plain sized am I crazy?

33:35 Let's look at it this way. If it is in low Earth orbit, and I should state for the record that I have never to my knowledge shot anything anywhere near the moon. I have shot nothing in lunar orbit. I have shot nothing over the face of the moon and the problem is that the way that I title videos to get people to watch them usually has the word Moon or UFO on the same thing but you've got to understand that we are told the moon is a quarter of a million miles away. Now I do know the pixel value of my camera, the old setup and new setup at that distance if we consider that the object were talking about was in low earth orbit or a couple hundred miles away

34:18 it's bigger than a plane allot bigger than a plane now if we consider that it's further than that which it this is one of the weird objects e all the things but i catch in oracle orbit are you could draw our ruler line perfectly straight and the editor and they will follow that because they are an orbit object is free flying you know you we have no way to really judge uh... was this an earth orbit doesn't even look like it's in order that looks like it's free flying um... you know the the huffington post covered one of my uh... clips a while back and you know i had to do a rebuttal to show though what they had said about the clip was just in error and i did this by talking with optics expert at the scope shop too

35:03 determine the actual distance of a pixel at my camera at 11,000 miles which is halfway to geosynchronous. And I demonstrated they were claiming that I was looking at satellite half way to geosynchronous orbit based on the speed which is legitimate calculation and how would have done it but the problem becomes knowing the pixel value this thing was three times the size of the International Space Station or that supposed station we were told about and I don't buy for a second that i'm filming something with three times that big. How do they get it up there for one?

35:40 It's an intense one and it looks very clear, and very interesting. That is one of my favorites that I've seen So...I want to get into the major thing that you have captured This is the thing people are calling or what you call the Lunar Wave Its created quite a buzz People are very interested in it but also people are very polarized in their opinion on it But explain to the people what you captured How do you introduce people to the lunar wave? I'm very careful. It's not an easy thing because it is so far outside of any reference point the average human has to associate and so let me tell you what happened the night i filmed it,

36:25 following week and it will help you to understand that not only was I exactly where, you know people view a video once and they draw conclusion. You know that's what YouTube is about very few people take the time to go back and study over and over clip but it was back in 2012 it was on the 26th of September just a few days past the fall equinox and I should preface that every wave that I have filmed has either been right after an equinox or right before the spring equinox. So I filmed the first one in 2012, and didn't see anything again until the spring equinox of 2014. And I was filming right along that whole time. So I'm filming that night by chance

37:08 When I film, I keep my camera centered on the moon because it takes endless hours. You're out there and you get bored. You just want to increase your odds so I don't move the camera much. For some reason, I panned the camera down below the moon and the wave started. Now I didn't see that but when I panned up above the wave, the wave caught up to the camera which has always proved that it's a filmed event. But at the time I saw it and my immediate reaction was, my camera is failing. So I reached over to delete the clip but for some reason I didn't which is also odd so now I've panned my camera in a strange way that I have never really done sensor before and I reach over to delete a clip which when I do what I do it and for some reason I didn't had I done that it would have been unretrievable

37:56 So I filmed on that night and that clip gnawed on me in the back of my mind. I kept going back looking at it thinking, okay camera failure camera failure Well, I've got a degree in internet technology And what was gnawing on me in the back of my mind is digital equipment doesn't fail in an organic way It just doesn't you know You see pixelation signal shredding all these kinds of things associated with losing a digital signal so I think a month or more went by and finally one day, I went in looked at it and I just said out of hell with it. I deleted the clip that night as I laid down for bed. I had the epiphany and I ran out to the computer booted up restored the clip out of my trash can and it scared me

38:41 because I realized all at once what the camera pan meant. The camera pan had proved that it was a filmed event, and it was very fortunate because had that not been part of the clip there would have been no way to address any of the other 9 that have been filmed today that we know of now because so many people will just say it's atmosphere, it's camera. They'll say what they want but that fortunate camera pan gave me a benchmark to consider I first dealt with the wave, thinking that it was equipment failure. So then after that of course comes endless hours of reviewing examining studying measuring talking to other people letting very smart people see the clip and

39:31 you know not before long i've talked to a guy who designed ccd chips who's saying yeah that's the filmed event along the course well it's like the third video or so I posted on my channel and I realized there was something special about it by the reaction. I got because I got contacted by first the one of the observatories and one of the stands Kyrgyzstan or I forget which country but they read me The Riot Act on how irresponsible and unscientific i was for saying things that I had said. And this didn't stop, this kept going so I realized there's got to be

40:08 You know there's something going on with this clip right yeah well further down the line a video engineer views it and he says you know you can use Luma gamma and noise to try to prove That the wave doesn't cross the video frame which I do. And sure enough, you can see the wave is not going beyond the edge of the moon so I tried to encode that clip. It takes hours and hours and hours. By the time YouTube's done with it it just looks like noise with a bright spot in the middle. So what I did was I ended up masking out the moon adding noise and making it black-and-white and putting up a lesser version of that would encode which is on my channel now. Two of the clips

40:51 were shot early enough in the night that there's enough ambient light that you can show the wave is not crossing the video frame but staying at the edge of the moon. But, in the 2012 footage maybe a year in when I got better video tools to edit with and I had stepped up my game there, I started to run some filters and we realized it looked like there was some kind of like a little invisible almost like a cloaked ship or something skirting across right before the wave starts so we started running find edge filters and things like this and it became instantly visible that there's an energy pulse that hits the lower left limb of the moon right before the wave starts, and then a lateral energy pulse sweeps from left to right as the wave is beginning. And then four seconds later, a shadow goes across the upper left limb of the moon which I had assumed was a bird. By this time i'm thinking well maybe this isn't a coincidence

41:46 As it turns out, in two other filmings of the wave we have seen this shadow that looks enough like a bird that its hard to make a claim beyond but its seems more than coincidence. maybe the latest clip on this where i've got all nine posted there's four other people could have shot that now to date two of them were not even aware that it was in their footage uh... users on my channel who had been following me spotted it and brought it to light if the real deal there something going on and uh... we have not been told about it and this clip seems to hit a nerve out there on the world so dot that's what i can tell you

42:27 Yeah man, it is definitely fascinating. And for people who haven't seen it just to clarify a little bit we're talking about you know your film in the moon you know you got the big full moon and then we have this solid straight across transparent wave that just kind of sweeps across the entire footprint or the entire surface of the Moon like uh... you know a guy washing a window like this little- this sweep straight across Is that kinda how you describe it to people who might not have seen the clip? Well, there's a couple things. First of all you can see the bow in the 2012 footage which is miles ahead of all other footage that's been captured. It's just by chance the best footage In that footage you can see as it crosses the equator of the moon There's a bow, so you know You can see that it's going around something round but the waves always come in pairs And they don't always come from the same direction and to top it off You know we were filming one of the two recent lunar eclipses and I spotted the wave in the middle of a lunar eclipse

43:28 Very subtle. The other thing to note is when I first filmed it in 2012, every subsequent capture has been a faster wave, a clearer or harder-to-detect wave and many have argued that someone out there knows you filmed it and they're trying to make it harder to see. It almost looks like organic old-fashioned video signal reset. It almost looks like if you would film off an old tube TV, the effect you would get but the problem is it's just on the moon and the energy pulse really brings that home. You can just see the curvature of lines when the filters are applied there is no doubt in my mind what I think I'm looking at

44:15 Yeah, I've tried to describe it to my girlfriend who hasn't seen it because I was explaining the show. I'm gonna do today and I explained it by saying like those old VHS tapes when you would hit the tracking on them those tracking buttons and you get that one line that goes across the whole screen It's like that but It only covers the moon. And yeah, the videos that I've seen it is at night so it's kind of hard maybe to see against a black background but like you said you have some that have some ambient light but I still think even with the black background its easy to see there's no disturbance in this space around the moon. Its just this one thing that sweeps across

44:52 and the entire surface of the moon, and it's not existing anywhere else in the frame. Very compelling! Very mysterious! What do you think that means? What do you think your capturing there?" Well, I would also add one more thing about the appearance for those who haven't seen it is we get that glass of water effect where as the wave is traveling It very slightly displaces The lunar features as it goes by almost like you're looking through a glass of water and you just move that glass of water A little bit So that's part of it. What? I think we're looking at is artificial now

45:29 when the second i say that the argument for me becomes a very hard because now they're gonna stay the moon's been there forever thousands of years hundreds of thousands here is whatever we didn't have all around back in the day be that as it may i have spent endless hours with my wife observing the moon every month that's twenty twelve and can tell when we first set up that we are looking at something that is not the same as it is on a different night. The problem with that is, to see it live unencoded on an HD monitor with an eyepiece is not the same as looking at video. When you look at video then you've got lighting contrast color all these things come into play which are going to obscure

46:19 the point that i'm trying to make here so I really haven't tried to but, I can tell you this. Every time NASA has said they're going to be in orbit at the moon every time the Chinese have said we're gonna have something up with the moon were gonna land on the Moon or orbit the Moon We are gonna crash something into the Moon my scope has been there and we have seen nothing and to top it off I'm getting ready to do some experiments and one of them is going to show that if i take my scope and shoot a mountain that's 5-10 miles away there's atmospheric disturbance in between me and that mountain. It's not crystal clear, the further away it gets the more that is That's never the case with the moon Every time you look at the moon If its not overcast Its crystal clear But this wave

47:08 is artificial. There's no doubt in my mind it's artificial I have said, in some of my clips early on that I thought maybe it was a hologram covering the surface of the moon so we couldn't see what was going on but since then...I've come to the point where I doubt everything we've been told about the moon and this is just based on a lot of filming, a lot of experience and a lot of deductive reasoning And so at this point I'm willing to say, I'm 100% sure that we're looking at something artificial. I don't know the cause of it. I don't know who's doing it but I do know in my heart of hearts that the moon is not what you have been told it is." Wow and that is definitely far out but just to clarify we're talking about not just the lunar wave as artificial but when you look up at the moon or sky do you think that whole ball that were looking at could be a fabrication?

48:06 Here's what happens in life. If you talk to a physicist and he starts talking really high-minded physics to you, as a human being your response is to say, ìYou know what? I don't understand what heís talking about. Heís the expert. I'll go with what he saysî Thatís human nature. The problem is that when you say, hey I'm a human being. I can think and do these things and you go out and make your own observations in your own studies everything you've been told starts becoming a problem. Everything you've been told starts becoming a problem. And the real problem is trying convey that other people because

48:49 but they are in a mindset where will wait a minute and school they told me that experts have told me this massive says death that's the problem you know go out and do observations on your own there's a man named bill bryson who viewed the moon for many thousands of hours uh... you in between bible study you know he would go to bible study talked about on his channel and then he would come home and uh... from the moon and when we started getting objects is initial reaction and his in his frame of reference was that he was filming fallen angels. That's what the little vehicles or whatever they were, that he started to film as you went on He was doing real close-up work with homemade really high tech cameras and stuff. He came to the conclusion that the mare or the mares, the seas on the moon are see through and then he could see cities beneath them

49:39 Well, while I don't necessarily agree nose to nose what i do agree with is that when you take the time to observe for yourself You will realize that things are not exactly how you've been told they are. Right so this is all fascinating So you think the lunar wave itself this line that goes across it Do you think that is a glitch in the hologram that reveals to us? That It's a hologram I could be something like that. There's so many logical problems though, because then we have to say okay well this must've been going on for quite some time how come more people haven't filmed it? Why only nine? Well part of the key to that is that two other people who provided me footage didn't even understand what was in their footage was a value

50:27 So that's the first thing. And the second part of that is I've got a lot of experience, yet the first time I filmed it I said the camera messed up and I almost deleted the clip for good! That kind of starts to address it but the real problem comes in with all the objects I have been filming as I started to calculate pixel distances – what pixels distance across in feet is at certain distances from my scope, I began to realize that these objects that I'm shooting are too big. And then I started realizing that many of these objects that I shoot have like a speed blur

51:07 And this is like satellites that I can identify, that you can look up and know it's this satellite. I've got a number of those that I filmed and yet they're going so fast that they have like a see-through speed blur on them. You can tell they look kind of like you think they should look. They're listed right there. Yep! This satellite should be coming by at about the speed very likely that you are looking what you think you are looking at. So I came to conclusion These satellites are not as high as we've been told because at those distances speed blur shouldn't even enter into the picture. Hmm, man so is there any chance maybe like have you considered something like maybe it's a magnetic or energetic effect? Like some type of wave of gravity or some type of ley line energy or anything like that that might exist that we just aren't aware of

51:59 So yeah, you know of the many hundreds of hours that this clip has been studied by people much smarter than I'll ever be. Coronal mass ejections from the sun have been looked at The description you just gave has been considered but when you take it to its logical conclusion when you say it's a natural event then you're faced with the same problem that i addressed a couple minutes ago what this is an actual bad how come we haven't been told about our how come and have a confirmed endlessly any natural event like that should be on film and should have a description from our fraudulent space agencies you know if it's in nature

52:38 We should know about it if it's observable and this is clearly observable. So I mean the logical problem that crops up, Is If this is natural why haven't we been told about it? Why hasn't have been filmed in endlessly?" Yeah It is so strange but it is hard to rectify that at least in my mind Man has been looking at the moon for hundreds and hundreds of years. Galileo's looking at it... Yeah, it's hard to rectify that it would be a hologram because how old would that technology have to be?

53:16 Yeah, but it's also possible that the sky we see now is not the sky we saw some time...some indetermined time back. That's true! But I would point out there are ancient texts—I believe some of them Roman—that talk about before-the-moon people came a time before the moon. There are older texts that you can read that talk about a time with two moons I mean, so the problem becomes what's a legitimate source to think about and what isn't. And that will always be the problem. You're right! I thought that was really fascinating some of those stories you've had in one of your videos, you talked about several of them. These old ancient texts that talk about the sky as even a dome they talk about some type of barrier above the sky They talk about the idea that the stars are almost like nails in the ceiling of our sky and that's pretty trippy stuff Well...I see we

54:16 as a race on this planet have been taught, at least in the part of the world where I live that time is linear. It's this thing you go down and it's a foregone conclusion that people are back in time did not have the technology or even the ability to think like we do now. I don't buy into that. I look at ancient megalithic structures and I'm in awe because I know for a fact that some of those things we can't replicate with everything we've got right now, never mind the precision and engineering that went into it. So I don't consider for a second that ancient people had any less cognitive ability and may well have had quite a bit more because they were just simply closer to nature than we are. We're very separated from nature. We don't even know what the date is. We're flying out loud.

55:04 Somebody decided to zero that out for us a couple thousand years ago, for Lord knows what reason. But the point I'm making is... If you look at those ancient texts, in my mind I feel like i'm getting a view that doesn't have the modern edit. The modern mindset you know all these things that we see like when you pick up a National Geographic now and you say crap! I can barely read this anymore. I read it in the 80s and now it seems like it's a kid's book just the modern kind of twist that is put on all the writings and things that we see these days. When I look at those old things, I feel like i get a glimpse that wouldn't otherwise have and I think you referenced Omar Khayyam and these are important texts and in the initiated groups those were big deal since im not in an initiated group I guess ill never know why it's a big deal to them but nonetheless when I read those words I feel like

56:01 getting an insight that I wouldn't have otherwise had. And you know, I would say to everyone read Omar Khayyam if nothing else. Read the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam because the way he talks about the sky makes you think." Right and like you said, the conventional view of history is that people have just gotten progressively better and advanced And if you look back at the things people were saying in ancient times, oh well they were just ignorant. They have no idea what was going on Of course they think there's a dome in the sky They can't send a satellite out there They don't have rocketry They do not have modern technology And I think that is very dismissive. It's a clever way to kind of put those people down, but when you look at something like NASA what would you say that if this were to be true? NASA's entire function would have to be to create this entire false reality around what space could be well

56:54 Well, you know this is...you're going to force me to say one of the things I guess I don't generally say too much in public because i know that it's gonna hit a lot of ears and away that's not helpful but in my view From what I have learned from first-hand observation, NASA's mission has never been science. NASA's mission is to ensure that we do not know next to anything about what's 100 miles or more above our head. They have been caught endlessly lying. You know, I did a clip not far back on this whole Rosetta mission. For anyone who still has the ability to critically think and look at what they're being presented with, you will understand very quickly that that is shenanigans. It's made out of whole cloth there is nothing real about it and when you further look into the images were given on that particular mission their camera in all their

57:49 infinite wisdom was four megapixels. So they spent a hundred million dollars on a camera and they gave us four megapixels, that's what they went out into space with and you know people come to my channel all the time and it never ceases to amaze me that someone will ask an honest question like one I heard recently how can a rocket work in the vacuum of space? There is nothing for it to thrust against! In my mind That should be legitimately talked about. But what we see in the comments section is, oh God break out the tinfoil hats we got another one here! And this is one of the big problems with the modern age if someone brings up a topic

58:34 You should address it. I mean, sure some things are beyond the pale but a question like that to me is a reasonable question." I would think so too and it might sound super far out that NASA would be created for this purpose, but we have examined on this show the Smithsonian in the past and how they've taken a lot of anomalous artifacts from the early United States and they have suppressed them including giant bones that have been discovered by the thousands yet They don't ever make it to display so we have the situation where the Smithsonian is considered the institution of you know that chronalizes history and yet

59:13 It's like limited hangout, because they show us some things and they say oh this is all we got but yet the real stuff is buried beneath. And NASA could also provide that false sense of security for space They're like the Smithsonian of Space perhaps Yeah, you know there's an interesting line in the beginning of one of the Indiana Jones movies where Indy is teaching his class. He looks out to his class and he says don't come here to do archaeology looking for truth because archaeology isn't going to give you truth it gives you facts if you want truth go down the hall to the philosophy class You know, it's these small little castaway lines that are blurted here and there that don't seem to mean much which really means something. And it's unfortunate that people don't catch them going by. There was a guy on one of my channels not long ago making the argument that there is not a museum in the world with a real dinosaur skull! I thought well that

1:00:09 That's an interesting claim and I thought, well I'll have to go look at that. I haven't had time yet but that the kind of guy i want to talk too The guy who is thinking on his own two feet maybe there something to it maybe there not but the point is he's no just regurgitating what has been handed all this life And I think most people agree one of peculiar things about age we live in right now Is a very deceptive age Oh, I totally agree and this also spills over into false flag events or when a tragic event happens immediately now the knee-jerk response is false flag didn't happen. And yes you don't want to be jumping to conclusions prematurely but

1:00:52 I would argue that it is better for the knee-jerk reaction to be, the news is lying to me rather than the news telling you the truth. So...I guess we're dealing with growing pains in deciding what's true and what's fiction but I don't mind that the default reaction is, you better prove this happened before you just tell me." Well, I don't see any problem with that. I think that should be the out-of-the box response to everything Yeah, and my live my life by the rule where I will believe nothing Nothing unless I have a damn good reason to do so and I went through some years ago My epiphany where?

1:01:30 I made the decision to throw out everything that i had ever learned and it is not an easy thing to do because it leaves you without a point of reference. And, you find yourself flipping back and clinging on to these things that you've been told your whole life but if you can pull that off for six months or year a whole new reality opens up where you see things in a whole other way as far as the news is concerned i have no compulsion to tell anyone that if it came from your news it is not just worthless at its best it is agenda and propaganda uh... dot what it is there's no doubt and in the real truth is that he takes some of them like candy hook which has been pretty well documented to be shenanigans

1:02:18 If you can accept that this has happened once, are you the kind of person that is going to cling to your old ideals and say well it happened once? Or are you gonna come to the realization where if I see one bunny there's more bunnies on this planet. Because that's really what this is about. Things do not happen in a vacuum Man, so let's assume that the lunar wave is evidence of a glitch in the hologram that is the moon. And then lets also assume some of these ancient writings we were talking about have some legitimacy for people who still might not be very clear on it what do you think the real composition of our sky is? Like if you had to say... If you took away all the manipulation and tried to get down to the truth what is up there? Is there no space? Is it a dome? What do you think it might be?

1:03:07 I, you know the honest answer is that i don't know. I am arriving at the conclusion that we do not leave low earth orbit That's not set in stone and I'm working feverishly to get some evidence that can help solidify this Some first hand evidence that I can gather or some experiment that I can run Or some logical deduction I can apply but very close to being convinced that space is nothing like we've been told, but to say that doesn't mean much when you can follow up with this is what it is. And unfortunately I can't do that. I don't know...I can't go there. I'm stuck like an ant on the ground like the rest of us and I have to figure out a way from my minuscule vantage point to deal with this. Not too long ago I shot what looks to be some sort of spaceship

1:03:58 with thrusters that just happened to come through my field of view. And I took that as a very important clip because the size of it, just what we were seeing, it was clearly had thrusters of some sort and it brought up all these questions like if that thing's 200 miles away and those thrusters are that big what kind of fuel would that thing be burning? It makes you begin to reconsider how far away is this thing? Is it in low earth orbit I guess the short answer is, is that I'm not sure how to address it. I don't know what's out there Yeah... It's..I mean to think this-the reality could be this different! I mean it throws a whole lot of things into the manipulation column if it were to be true I mean The whole composition of our solar system? The model we have for the planets? The orbits? I mean uh The constellations If all that stuff could be somehow

1:04:58 I mean, that's a pretty far out thought. spiritual sex on the planet but still think in this way but uh... even the movie the matrix kind of brings that home to people that reality is made by it you know your mentality your mind creates a reality and so if that is true they're really adds a whole nother ocean but he can't see the bottom of to think about um... and when you think about the media just

1:05:37 ensuring that you know the population of planet goes out and bases everything they were gurgitate in every decision they make in error it's just like the old computer cliche you know bad information and bad information out if your in the ruling class of this planet and you want to control a population uh... one of the easiest ways would be doing sure that everyone basing everything they say and do on erroneous information. If you're the ruling class, and you had good information that would be one heck of an advantage." Yeah if you make everybody's foundation inaccurate they got nowhere to go They're just lost in the forest before they even know that they need a map. That's right

1:06:19 And we're getting pretty close to the end of the show here. Are there any other secrets or things that you've been able to, that you might have stumbled upon in your research that you think are worth mentioning? That we might not have touched on before we start wrapping this up Not that I'm really ready to divulge yet. My intent is to do a series of kind of logical clips before too much more time goes by, to try and demonstrate something particular about the moon. I don't know how that will come out but I've got an idea on how to proceed other than that you know... The one thing i would also mention I guess as I see a lot of people

1:06:58 hating the Masons, hating the Illuminati if that's even a thing. Hating all these people and I can tell you reasonably, I'm reasonably sure that they are all encoding and using the same information from a very distant ancient source. And a lot of it has to do with the sun. I do not believe the information is evil. I believe the information is like anything else on this planet you can use it for bad or use it for good. I consider what I am trying to discover including things about the sun as my birthright And I consider that the people who misuse it are simply taking valuable information and using it in a negative way. So, that's what I would add

1:07:42 Well said and I agree with you we talked to people who have studied that stuff And they kind of talk about sacred geometry and the enlightening nature of it, right? I totally agree. It can be used for either or just like a hammer I could bash your head in or build you a house. That's really up to me. That's right well This has been fascinating man definitely a far-out idea We explored some unique concepts on some big secrets to keep But that lunar wave footage definitely makes you think twice. Would you like to remind the people where they can check out your work before we go? You can catch me on YouTube as Crow777, there are two R's in the word crow so it's C-R-O-W 777 and that's primarily my main source of online communication I have a Facebook account but i don't use it because I do not appreciate Facebook

1:08:30 Right on. Well, very cool I do appreciate your time this has been very awesome and a lot of fun take care of yourself out there Crow Hey thanks for having me and have a great day There we have it party people another one in the bag! I love that first hour but in the second hour We talked more about comets and asteroids ISON and Rosetta The problems crow had with that stuff Crows footage on Jupiter turning blue The references to ancient Egypt and mythology That NASA uses to name their missions and probes And the possible reasons for that, Crow's reasons for not buying the moon landing. Problems Crow sees with the footage and pictures that we get of the Earth and Moon from space. Insights Crow's background as a radio operator has given him about concerns and dangers and health effects of radio waves and wireless signals and wifi. More talk about poisons in our society Another suppressed alternative cancer cure and more speculation about space, the lunar wave, and reality itself

1:09:27 All in all, I think this is a great show and hope for the next month every time you look at the moon you think, Is that thing real? Then I'll know I've done my job. See it's strange but it's fresh and different and thats what I love about it It's not a lot to go on, even Crow would admit that. But he makes a good point if you can't see it and touch it how can you take it off the table in this backwards world? but then you wonder where you draw the line I mean you say I'm breathing oxygen but I don't see anything You say there is this gravity thing...but I dont know what that is! You say that the sun is a massive incandescent gas A gigantic nuclear furnace But it just looks like a lightbulb to me

1:10:09 Of course it can get a little bit ridiculous, but you have to try to find your own truth without devolving into madness. Not always an easy task! So let me be your guide. And as for THC, you know a big part of doing a show like this is authors making the media rounds and when that occurs I hope listeners think I do a better than average job with those shows but there's more to it that i want to accomplish here. I want to look under the rocks and find people who haven't talked much about their findings or ideas. I've even been talking to a few guests and listeners who speak other languages that might be able to find interesting nuggets, interesting books written in other languages guests that might not even speak English that I would be willing to communicate with through a translator and then edit it so its not inconvenient for the listener but we could get into some really crazy out of the box stuff that I would love to do its just knowing where to look

1:11:06 and having those people come to us. Sometimes people ask me what the goal of THC is or they'll come at me with a position, or purpose that is way off the mark from my true goals and ideas And it makes me think that sometimes I'm not clear... ...and that is what it is but let's look at today A perfect recipe for me, a well-spoken guest That's key! A guy who's not positive about his work Not condescending, not shut off from other possibilities Not cocky Great tone in approach Also important And the third pillar, bringing something to the table that many of us have never considered. New ideas and today I think we hit that trifecta and that's the model i'd like to apply it to all kinds of different subjects that we cover. I think we've done a great job with magic lately last week's cryptid show is good but it's not always easy to get that perfect recipe

1:11:56 We are going to do a lot more shows on topics where you will probably right out of the gate be like, what? No way. And then hopefully I can help my guests make the case for X Y or Z along the way but it's a fine line between what's worth exploring and what's too far and we are gonna flirt with that line because it's fun! This show is about entertainment and inspiration and exploration and fun cause none if its worth doing if we don't have a gay old time right Also, sometimes I get messages or comments about not liking a topic before they've even heard the episode just based off the title. And I hope by now after 150 episodes or so that you just learn to kind of trust me a little bit granted and I'm going to strike out once in awhile it will happen but i think you'll find that even when a topic doesn't immediately sound exciting doesn't immediately resonate with your eternal being

1:12:52 It ends up being better than you might have thought, maybe. I don't know. But that's the show! Please sign up for PLUS if you'd like to help me out and get twice as much show! I can afford to do it, which is really up to people getting THC+. And when this happens, I'm definitely going to do some filming and put something together that would be a gift for the plus people. The actual individuals who made it possible. Again this is about trusting me as a host and a guy of integrity. Conspiracy projects are notorious for being hyped-up and then just completely falling apart nothing happens. And I do not want to be in that category but once I have

1:13:40 some extra money from THC+, I'm going to use it, yes to enjoy my life and the career that's been built here but also in a lot of ways that create extra enjoyment and entertainment for the people supporting it. We might be able to make some real differences down the line? I've got some really out there ideas... And who knows how its gonna go! Who knows for how many years we'll do it?! But more members means more options and thats just the simple equation And that's enough math for me. I really do love you guys, let's keep doing this for a long time Tell your friends about THC tell your favorite speakers and conspiracy researchers that they need to be coming on THC To get their material seen in the best light with a good host who will help them navigate these rough waters of the airwaves We got to stop messing around and release the hounds

1:14:31 Alright, I've done what i can do. Your move operators of the big vatican moon projector... your fricken move! Sweet dreams to the elite We're calling them out on THC Uncovering secrets and conspiracies Everybody's looking for something Some of them want to use you Some of them want to get used by you. Some of them want to abuse you, some of them want to be abused.

1:15:21 Sweet themes on DHC Who the hell could disagree? We know the rabbit hole goes deep Everybody's digging for something Some of them want to use you Some of them want to get used by you. Some of them want to abuse you. Some of them want to be abused.