45:05 Have some merit that's a problem and vice versa for the globe earthers like i mean in the flat earth is too it just. It's a little difficult it's a little difficult to get wrapped up in the either or argument when maybe the reality is that, i don't like to use hologram i don't like to use terms like simulation But maybe this is God's sandbox for physical experience and we're hyper analyzing it as if it's something objectively solid and real, and it just isn't. Maybe! Yeah, maybe. I look at it differently. I do think that you have to jive with observations whatever we decide on now doesn't mean that it has to when you say either or is it a false dichotomy? Well the earth is either flat or its sphere there's really no other option at least what I've ever seen nobody's ever come forward and said well maybe it's this reverse saddle inside because it has to match observations and the only thing that comes close is the flat Earth or the globe Earth
46:04 Both of them are pretty close, but the flat Earth falls apart when you get south of the equator. It really just has no way of being correct anymore and again if we went down there and saw the sunset and we saw that the South was not working as it's described then the go-to model would be the flat Earth and that would be what I would expect to see there but everything else just leans towards... And again like he said all these other 200 proofs, a lot of his proofs are true on the globe earth, right? So the idea of we measure flat below our feet. That's the globe earth claim or water finds its levels. The globe Earth claims that as well. We see too far. The globe Earth claims that so a lot of things that I used to think were flatter evidence are actually globe. That's what the globe predicts and it just so happens that we can steal it because the earth is so big that it looks flat
46:50 Right but the conventional model also does tell us that our eyes and the composition of our physicality are all twisted up like isn't what we see supposed to be backwards and flipped in there i self corrected not like there's a lot of weird stuff so like even our senses can't necessarily be trusted. I don't know, but i did want to ask you this because i don't want to get caught up in like the debate of flat earth 101 because i'm really not even the guy to do it and there's so many hours of content out there. But i guess when it comes to what has happened... Do you think that you
47:27 would be receptive to the conclusions if you weren't physically there? Or would you be acting like a lot of the other people are acting towards you. Well, I mean it's hard to say. I mean, I would like to believe that I wouldn't be acting like them but I also recognize that I might. The only difference is is that if anybody else did what we did, the amount of cameras, the amount of footage for instance, I went live the 11th from Punta Arenas, the 12th from Punta Arenas, the 13th, the 14th from Antarctica 15 16 17 so every day that I was down there I went live That's pretty hard to, we can't fake that. I actually said the scores of football games that were on Thursday night when we got there to prove that it was there when we said we interacted with the chat proving that it was live so I would like to think if it was other people who went there then I would certainly not just dismiss it outright and not go by things they went by. They were saying things like oh there are no footprints in the snow but there is no snow there. They were very confused about that
48:21 You couldn't see our breath, so people said it was in a studio. But then you can just look up one time on Google why don't I see my breath in Antarctica? Well that's because its got a humidity of 0.01%. It's completely dry. Its a desert and so people are confused about what Antarctica actually is they would show images of the mountain and say look at the mountain hasn't changed in three years well that true because It doesn't snow there. So people don't realize that they think it snows all the time in Antarctica, it doesn't just never gets above 32 degrees so it never melts. It's just keeps accumulating ice. To me I know that flat earth will never be correct just based off the people involved really back when you go back to Rob Skiba being there and Bob Nodell from Glowbusters a lot of these guys were into the research science end of
49:08 Today, we don't have people like that anymore. There's just people who do live streams, there's people who make fun of Globers who basically it's like a big echo chamber. They never provide anything and there's even people that have started branching off into people who think the Earth is rising up and I just see it as a huge distraction and something that will never come to fruition. There'll never be a day where we wake up in the Earth B flat, just will never happen because again, the sunrise sunset times...I don't know if you know this but if you went to December 21st let's say that's when the South would be having its 24-hour sun. So if you put your marker on a globe at the South Pole, it would be 24 hours of daylight as you move it up to the North Pole. It just reduces in perfect unison 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 all the way do you get to zero? And then when it's June 21st, it's the opposite starts at 24 hours at the North Pole and you drag that bar down and it's the daylight hours go perfectly down to zero at the South Pole so That's because the Earth is
50:05 It's symmetrical, right? It's the same in the north as it is at the south. Just six months later everything has flipped. We have a North Pole sun that if you stood at the North Pole it goes around from your left hand to your right hand, no matter which direction you're looking. If you're at the North Pole, the sun goes left or right. In the South Pole, same thing. The sun goes the opposite direction, right to left. That right there cannot happen on any flat earth because the Sun would have to change directions in the sky. How does it go right for these people and then all of a sudden now it's the Southern summer so I'm going to go left. Well, that doesn't work because if it went left then we would see it in the north set right to left but we actually see it stay left-to-right. So to me, it's clear and I thought that when we came back telling people hey the south is what
50:45 is told to us. Everything jives exactly where it's at, you know I don't know if you know this but if you go 69 miles and stay on a longitude line north or south every 69 miles then the stars the North Star would drop by one degree right? And if you take that 69 miles times 360 it's the circumference of the earth so you could call a friend and say hey do me a favor walk north 69 miles until me how much the North Star reduces or actually would go higher in the sky And they'll say one degree. So everybody in the Earth can do that and we would all come back with one degree, which means the Earth is a sphere of circumference 24000 miles right? Well one of the convincing things to me has always been the time-lapse photography of the North Star and you know You're kind of talking adjacent to that now But when you see all the stars make a perfect circle around it It's like okay That would account for the rotation of the earth but not the orbit of the earth shouldn't those stars look more like a