1:18:56 And it's not really worth arguing is it good or bad because its like any one thing, how its used and who running that determines if it's good or bad. We don't get to choose anyway but talk with about your thoughts on the multipolar world and why they're moving us this direction in really more Why it's not as appealing as a lot of people are making it seem. A lot of people seem to be welcoming this, which is always the red flag when you're welcoming the trajectory that the global elite seems to be moving us towards. Yeah well global government isn't something that has actually been achieved yet... Not quite
1:19:36 You've got nice and global government systems the united nations in your area can go back to the league of nations so far so the idea been on the table for a long time. The united nations it doesn't have the authority yet, issue laws to my station state everything is done by agreement everything is done by resolution which nation states agree Set up to that international law which i can't even good example of a bad with regard to international law is israel is ralph defied. I'm any international resolutions and roll for rolling it's unbelievable how many resolutions that i just ignored,
1:20:25 Now you can argue whether or not that's a good or bad thing but the fact is the international law applied like that very rarely to actually come through any kind of venture on any country, what any individual so occasionally we see war crime trial where i usually some walker in all the health care account. That's about as far as it goes there and there isn't really this kind of body control which is what global governance is all about Now since people would bring me a global government before they invented the united nations what the oligarchs believe was there in order for that to happen you would need what i call regional balance of power system.
1:21:08 nation states would have to be subservient to their regional blocs and then what you would do was administer the bureaucracy of the regional blocs so you would cascade policy and legislation and law from a centralized point down to the regional blocks, and then the regional blocs would oversee the conduct Member states i will already see that with the european union. That's how the european union works i mean you're opinion finally enough it can't replace a change at the moment because, you know the polish for example of just refused to ratify their digital services act that's good
1:21:50 Is good yep so that's what individual nation states can do something you use response to that is the start talking about what they call regional representative voting i remember what they called basically the weight of your vote is proportional to your population. France and germany will dominate because they got the biggest populations, so that's what they're talking about overcome the problem with nation upper tea nation state not going along with it not going along with the plan Now when you think about the European Union, the European Union was created by the Bilderberg Group. They decided that there would be a more or less I mean you can talk go back to the Second World War but post-Second World War period the Bilderberg Group decided that there would be a European union, a European economic community that was created by treaty they wrote the paper in 1955 and then they made that happen...that happened
1:22:45 So these are not elected officials, these are people that are in a globalist think tank that decide they're going to create a continental union and then create one. kind of system lent itself well to multipolarity which is what the Rockefellers were particularly interested in and the Rothschilds are particularly interested in, in the post-in the pre second world war period. Subsequently in the 1990's it's what groups like The Club of Rome released their plan for a tent what they call a ten kingdom model you've got groups that were set up like The Trilateral Commission that are based on the same idea this regional balance of power system and they're trying to set it up
1:23:26 in order to establish real global governance this notion of having a centralized global body that controls the earth. That's the objective of it and they always thought that multi polarity will be the way to do that, i'm always so when you see now a lot of people arguing for multipolarity What they are essentially arguing for is global governance. That's what they're arguing for now that has been again we come to this narrative thing so how are you going to get people to go along with this crazy idea that some centralized body should rule the earth? How are you gonna get people to buy into that well, you start saying things like The Old Order
1:24:17 the unipolar world order, the international rules-based order led by at the moment what it appears to be the kind of US Zionist kind of power block transatlantic zionist power block that is doing crazy stuff like committing genocide and starting wars for no reason I mean it's long done that kind of thing but you say what this car go on this car go on the way we better if we have a regional balance of power system. I need some respects that probably true it probably would be better in some respect,
1:24:56 But they're selling us a narrative and why are they selling us the narrative because they're actually asking us, The people of the planet to accept that global governance is a good idea. And it's a terrible idea! It's an insane idea So all that does is allow the people that want to rule us, people like Steven Rothkopf, we call the super class but I prefer to call the parasite class. It allows them the opportunity to do what they've always wanted to do which is control everything and everyone so why would go along with that? And yet some people are. Yes it's true and as much like were talking about the financial system or