27:35 That's another thing that gets me when people want to say, well black men are committing more crimes or are more violent. Well on top of the statistics we already pointed out the frustration that comes from the harassment or the general neglect of black communities poverty that kind of stuff is gonna push some people into a well screw it i might as well get mine kind of mentality but if we reverse engineer that, it starts with the way they're treated by law enforcement in their earlier encounters or the system in general when people gets so frustrated they give up while there prone to commit crimes. So where's that mindset really starting you know lot of times its with these encounters
28:22 Yeah, I think that's right. In other words, I don't think that black and brown kids are more inclined to have those attitudes than white. It's just that white kids are not exposed to cops in the same way as black kids. They're not treated the same. They're not even around cops because police officers aren't deployed to white neighborhoods and they're not in a lot of schools where upper middle class kids are but they're Urban schools, they're in a lot of public schools. And we still live in a segregated society despite the fact that the laws have changed and neighborhoods are still very segregated. Schools are still very segregated despite Brown v Board because of the neighborhoods being segregated and so you're having police officers dealing more with black and brown kids than with white kids and bringing them into this system.
29:16 And to quote you again, you write black men are policed and treated worse than their similarly situated white counterparts at every step of the criminal justice system from arrest through sentencing. Well obviously we've talked about racial profiling We know they're harassed more often in general to get to that first stage of an arrest but But walk us through some of those major steps that would come after an arrest, all the way up to sentencing. Where are we seeing the greatest injustices in those steps of the process? Well I focus a lot on the prosecutorial stage
29:52 You know, there's been a lot of attention to police officers and there should be a lot of attention paid to police. We can see with the events of the past few months and years we must pay attention to cops they have a lot of power and a lot of discretion on the street to stop and frisk and ultimately engage in encounters that can end up with people being killed so we have to continue to pay attention to them But we also must equally pay attention to prosecutors, and I think people don't pay enough attention to that step of the process. It's my contention that prosecutors are in fact the most powerful officials in our criminal justice system. And the reason why I say that Greg is because although police officers have the power to stop and arrest a person and bring them to the courthouse door, that's kind of where their power stops when it comes to that person's involvement in the criminal justice system
30:43 Once they bring the person to the courthouse door, it is up to the prosecutor To decide whether that individual stays in the system and what happens to them. And the reason for that is because prosecutors and prosecutors alone decide whether an individual is charged with a crime. That's really what gets the person involved in the system The police officer can only recommend charges. The prosecutor has total discretion in deciding what to do at that point, they can accept the recommendation, they can charge a person with something higher or they can just simply dismiss the case even if they have the power to charge. Let me just give an example to try and illustrate what I mean. Let's say a police officer arrests a person
31:32 And that person has five bags of cocaine on them. And the police officer brings them to the court and recommends that the prosecutor be charged with possession with intent of distributing cocaine. That is a felony charge in all jurisdictions, it carries a mandatory minimum sentence by that I mean if the person's convicted they have to serve that sentence The judge has no discretion to give them a break even if their first offender And so the police officer says I recommend that you charge this person with five counts of distribution of cocaine. Each count carries, let's say it carries 10 years in prison and that is realistic. You know it varies from state to state but that's a realistic sentence for a crime like that. The prosecutor can decide
32:22 A number of things. Prosecutor can accept that recommendation and bring the five counts for possession with intent to distribute, or the prosecutor can say you know what I'm just going to charge this person with a misdemeanor even though i can charge him with a felony give this person a break and charge them with a misdemeanor that only carries one year in prison for each one That's what I'm gonna do Or the prosecutor can say um this person looks like a good decent person he's college bound He never had an arrest record And so I'm just going to dismiss the case and let him go entirely. Prosecutor can do all of that, any of those things." Now you can see how if the prosecutor decides to give favorable treatment to one person and dismiss their case, and look at another person and decide to charge them harshly it can create disparities. Oftentimes way too often those disparities break down along class and race lines